18/2/5 134 CS, 24 minutes, no S. 23/5/14 202 CS, around 35 mins, no S. 11/1/11 122 CS, time idk can't check rn, no S. 4/2/4 64 CS, S-. I'd like an explanation for this, I'm being dead serious, this confuses me.
EDIT: I GET THE CS, BUT EXPLAIN WHY 4/2/4 GAME WAS AN S
18/2/5 134 CS, 24 minutes, no S. 23/5/14 202 CS, around 35 mins, no S. 4/2/4 64 CS, S-. I'd like an explanation for this, I'm being dead serious, this confuses me.
More cs
The answer is always more CS.
what about it
It matters who you killed at what time during the game and when you died during the game. Like if you die with a 55 second timer on you, that is freaking horrible for your team in many cases and it reflects in the score u get.
And on all these score things cs is like a qualifier to have an s. Ya can't just get like 20 kills and die 5 times and only farm 100 cs and get an s. That part is a little dumb but that's how it works.
Cs and wards and kill participation
this was S, not S+
I really dont know what kind of unreasonable expectation Riot has of ad carries
100 CS BY 20 minutes. 200 CS BY 30 minutes. 300 CS BY 40 minutes.
and so on.
One of those games you had 202 CS at 35 minutes. I've been playing this game for almost 4 years and when that new mastery level 6-7 came I noticed that this usually determines whether you get an S or not, regardless of the amount of deaths you have. I went 6/7/something as Kog'maw before and got an S- because I last hit EVERYTHING and we even won the game for reasons I don't know of.
Primarily based on average performance in similar MMR and similar game length. The game with 64 cs was a game where the enemies opened, right?
(edit) yeah I just checked your op.gg... 15-minute games are easy to get an S with, since most of the time people have negative (or zero) k/d and don't go for cs. As for the other games, 6 cs per minute is "good" while 10 cs/minute is considered "perfect" (almost guaranteed to get an s when paired with a decent k/d).
