Fix the "I Agree" statement. You can do better.

I agree not to jeopardize the enjoyment of others, and I agree not to purposefully put them at disadvantage and waste their time in unfair matchups. I certainly do. But what about those who are stuck in an uneven game because of other players quitting? You've establised that they are the victims here, so shouldn't they be able to escape the unfair situation when someone has left?

And true, it is not too painful to wait for the surrender timeframe, even if your teammate disconnects in the first few minutes of the game. Given that, what happens when one person wants to leave this unfair, inevitable decline, and two stubborn teammates resist? Should they then be punished for prolonging an unfair game? For wasting their comrades time? Why not?

Should you throw a blanket statement at those that leave afterward, telling them, whom you have marked as victims, that hey are now at fault for* refusing to play an unfair game to it's unhappy completion*? I understand that a little bit of unfairness is tolerable in the system. Matchmaking is a good example of that. **What I don't understand is the insensitive, forced, blanket statement, that gives no credence to actual events.