I Seem To Have a Different Idea of What "Meta" Is Than Most
When looking at threads I see a lot of people referring to a certain group of champions as "meta" champions. From what I understand the meta is the solo top/solo mid/duo bot/jungler, which is made to maximize gold/xp flow, buff and dragon control. Mages frequent mid for dragon assistance and easy access to the blue buff, the duo bot is for more dragon control and a support to compensate for an adc's need to get fed. Going by this there is no meta or non-meta champions because all champions can play a role. I guess there are some champions that do better in the meta than others, but that doesn't make them "non-meta." Am I alone in this thinking?
or
as bot lane supports to a marksman ADC would not be off-meta picks, they would simply be odd choices for filling a role in the prevailing meta. A duo-bruiser bot or fighter kill lane, such as a
/
lane, would be truly off-meta, in that it does not fit the popular strategy. There are, of course, other metas, such as the triple bruiser meta, in which an entirely different champion profile is used to create another set of roles for an effective team composition.