What are you even trying to say here?
Yea sure, low elo people might for some of them be better than their current rank (so what)
And sure some might not have that much time to play. But I hardly doubt that if they don't have a lot of time to play, they have the level of game understanding/mechanics of a high elo player.
And I don't mean they don't have the potential to get it. I mean that they don't currently have it.
I'm in fact really bothered by people in low elo that claim to have great game knowledge and all. I mean, why would you try to brag about this? How would you even know? When you're not really great at something, there are tons of things you don't even see, and account in your judgement, making your understanding of the game flawed, because you can't comprehend what you can't see.
I have somewhat experienced that as I climbed the ladder, because the more I understood things and gained in skill, the more I realised how unskilled and very far from the best I actually was. So I find them quite presomptuous for low elo people to say they're good, may it be in game knowledge or mechanics when I know that as a mid-diam player, I actually suck compared to lots of player in master/chall.
And that when I'm smurfing in 'low elo', I just roflstomp the game 90% of the time and 1v9.
Now, the "I'm high elo so I'm right" argument is frustrating and I don't like this a lot.
But when you're high elo, it does mean something. Either that you have good mechanics, or good game knowledge, or both. Or that you got boosted, but that's something else. Or carried, but statistically, that's INSANELY unlikely. The ranking system is actually way better than people think.
(btw, high elo is relative and doesn't mean much. I guess for silvers or sthg, diam is high elo, when for me, diam is kinda.. bad, and I am.. kinda bad. Everything is relative, I guess).
So when as a high elo player, you talk about balance, and then some low elo guy comes in and just says "no you're talking shit, you don't understand anything" without providing actual argumentation to the table, it's very frustrating. And leads to the elo argument, in general.
Just that to say that, it's better when you're talking with someone that's higher elo, so statistically speaking, more likely to have a greater game knowledge, to have an argumentated discussion. Back up your sentences, provide content to prove that you're really telling something relevant.
Doesn't mean that high elo players should not also provide a good argumentation when talking about sthg. But it's easier to give them the benefit of the doubt, to some extent. Harder for low elo people, because in general, they don't see the whole picture.
PS : I, too, avoid ranked because it's toxic. I have only 68 ranked this season, for hundreds and hundreds of normals. Yet I'm still D3 ; and my mmr in normals is quite high. If you don't rank, the mmr in normals is actually relevant to figure out how good you are. I usually got back to rank when I saw that the people I was facing in normals were actually harder to beat than the ones I faced in ranked.