So are stats only useful when they support your narrative?
Right? Because I see shit like "champions with mobility give up nothing and are just more mobile".
Really?
Then why does it seem like...
https://i.imgur.com/IzlkATd.png
the top win rate charts are full of immobile champions. If mobile champions can literally do everything and immobile one can - then why are immobile champs even remotely good. Wtf.
Wait.. wtf... where are all these mobile champions...
https://i.imgur.com/VMoX9d9.png
that I keep hearing about... Why aren't they dominating the win rates...
Oh, or maybe mobility/single target damage isn't the only thing important in this game. Maybe immobile champions have power elsewhere in their kits - and having a more forgiving kit doesn't mean shit when you can't have any impact. Yeah sure, you can position worse, but good job - you can be Zed and never die using your mobility while you lose the game cause you don't do anything.
Now imagine if mobile champions actually dominated win rates - you’d constantly see people citing stats. But since stats don’t support it - they are nowhere to be seen.
- "Mobility champions are higher skillcap."
Umm, why? I thought they were literally as good as immobile champions just with more mobility. How can they have a higher skill cap? Ohhh... thats right. When you lose to a Lee Sin, he's low skillcap/braindead easy/too forgiving - but when it comes to his win rate is low, its cause hes too high skillcap. Ok.



