What if Fiora's passive Vitals gimmick was on her ultimate only?

B0OM·6/27/2017, 2:46:22 PM·4 votes·630 views

What kind of compensation would she need to keep her kit functional and viable?

For example, passive shifts to lower amounts of movespeed and heal on champion hit, tripled on ult Vital procs + massive % max hp true dmg (again, only on now ult-only Vital procs). Just spitballing.

What are your ideas? What could Fiora look like with her Vitals moved only to her ult?

8 Comments

five oh tree 6/27/2017, 3:34:15 PM2 votes

She instantly takes basically no skill whatsoever. Becomes stale and boring. Her lane phase is weak and her gimmick is 1v1'ing literally anyone who comes to stop her from splitting (worse than now). It looks good on paper, but she suddenly because the literal, unkillable god of 1v1s regardless of gold, but sucks more ass in 2v2/3v3/etc.

IronwallJackson6/27/2017, 2:53:56 PM1 votes

Fiora's vital passive is what let's her bring down tanks, and if you take that away from her, you'd be taking away one of the hallmarks of the Skirmisher class. Thus, removing her passive, as it stands, means you have to add another ability with a similar function. Fiora needs to be a damage threat to everyone or else she'd be basically pointless.

ScantyXKneesocks6/27/2017, 2:56:57 PM1 votes

Fiora is really meant to keep the tanks on their toes. In this case it does mean she is powerful against an unprepared champion. I do enjoy her playability though.

Laxfan526/27/2017, 3:12:54 PM1 votes

Are you saying it would be a passive part of her ult? If it was a passive part of her ult that works just like how it works now, i would like it. It would make her pre 6 power lower, but would keep her late game strong.

Darkdemon6536/27/2017, 4:02:36 PM1 votes

I do agree that her ult vitals should be stronger than her regular vitals (and then her regular vitals could lose a little bit of power), but I see no reason to move her innate to her ult.