6 among 130. You better hope they forget the other OPs.

Am I the only one concerned by the fact that, still, we only get 3 bans per team when the champion pool is narrowing 130 champions? Is there any meaning to banning now? Riot seems to be in the mindset of improving draft pick so please, for the love of God, give us more then 3 bans per team.

Banning used to be a fairly important part of strategy. The team would discuss a bit, ban the one annoying champion no one likes, ban Teemo, and then ban a counter or a champion that could screw the strategy they had planned. That's something I wished to see again when Riot announced that banning wouldn't be done by only one person anymore. But no.

Now that the champion pool is so big, every patch changing or adding an item brings out a couple of champions whos mechanics added to the said item are completly broken. Add to this that there is always a couple of champions standing on top of the others who are also must bans. BIM! Your 3 bans are already gone and you better pray for the other team to use their bans the same way (especially if you don't have the first pick) or you can be sure the one of those champions will be the in your game to ruin it.

And don't you dare banning when you want to play or when you want to play or even when you want to play . Because you can be sure there will be one of those champions to steamroll all over your game and your team is gonna flame you all game long for that ban.

You're already half way there Riot, couldn't we hae 1 ban/player? That would be wonderful.