Regarding Lee, "The Most OP Champ for 4 Seasons"

This forum is so blind in its rage towards Lee that it can see nothing else when the topic is brought up.

Lee is NOT broken, nor is he overpowered, especially in soloQ. While his kit may be overloaded, he requires high mechanical knowledge and skill, along with players who know how to snowball off of his early ganks (he falls off like a bitch lategame).

Because all of these conditions are met in LCS/Pro Play, Lee is commonly perceived as being overpowered. Perhaps, in the hands of these extremely skilled players, he is broken. But, in the hands of most SoloQ'rs, there is nothing that makes Lee stand out.

If Lee is nerfed because of the fact that he is so highly contested in Pro Play, then we may as well forget balancing on the 99% and instead focus on just the 1%, and delete half the champions in the game (only 61 champs were picked/banned at worlds out of the then 120, so the rest are useless, right?).

And although the community is vehemently opposed to winrates as a measure of a champion's strength, I'd just like to point out that Lee has a 48% winrate in DIAMOND+, where I think we can agree players are very skilled. This is decidedly average, and is nowhere near what Warwick has recently achieved (and I think we can agree, WW is an example of a stupidly broken champion in patch 4.20).

Additionally, even in Pro Play, Lee still only had a winrate of 55% at worlds. Definitely high, but still nowhere near, for example, Rengar (85%). So do we need to nerf Rengar AGAIN?

Anyway, it's unlikely anyone will see this post due to the shitstorm of downvotes that is sure to follow any reasonable statement saying anything even treading on "defending the most broken champ in the game".