Is it just me, or do I find one-for-all's pacing better than ranked?

PickIe Rickkk·4/10/2018, 8:17:43 PM·1 votes·814 views

Riot's been trying to push this half long strategy game half fuckfest for 15 minutes.

Early/mid/late game are all arbitrary words we describe the grouping strategies of the game at a given time. What's been recent is early game lasting like 80% of the game and games being shorter; everybody's in lane until they are so strong that they can group once and end. So they win early and they win the game due to the entire game being 'early'.

But I think one for all is fast-paced to get to late game. Like instead of early game lasting 20 minutes and late game 35 minutes, you get to mid game at 10 min and late game in 15-20 minutes and get to duke it out with your champ's max power.

The starting level 3. The extra gold/xp boost.

-Kinda like starting Feudal Age instead of Dark Age on Age of Empires if you know what I mean. Kinda just eliminates 50% of the tedious villager training (farming in league) and early cheese attacks before you actually make your huge armies and siege weapons n shit.

3 Comments

Dasdi964/10/2018, 8:36:09 PM1 votes

The problem with the level 3 start and increased exp/gold is that it removes jungling from the game. In this mode, jungling is actually inferior to 2 top.