Skip to content

If SILVERS cannot Duo with PLATINUMS, WHY are they queued AGAINST ONE OTHER?

Glauciane··112 votes·20,067 views
Imgur

Match-Maker becomes a Joke late-night. I prefer to wait 5 minutes for a fair match than 2 minutes for a totally unfair one. Silvers cannot duo with Platinums since it would cause an unbalanced match. But they can play against one other anyway.

Obviously, Silver 3 twitch made the poorest performance and Plat 4 kai'sa carried.

EDIT: THIS IS A RANKED GAME. https://imgur.com/CRkMlq1 You cannot expose other people nicknames on boards while talking about their bad performance, as i'm doing w/ twitch. It always ends up in your topic being deleted.

EDIT2: Those percentages are not the winrated. j4 does not have a 80% rank winrate, it's just his kda. 6+14/6+14+3 = 80%.

72 Comments

Jamaree62 votes

Because rank literally means nothing the only thing that matter is MMR, there isn't a good reason for MMR to be hidden.

/thread.

LA Losty8 votes

Ranked is just ruined this season, i really dislike it.

TehNACHO1 votes

Okay, to be fair it's almost always been the case that matchups are determined by MMR, not rank, since forever. You can still say what you want to say but it's not a particular element of Ranked this season.

LA Losty1 votes

They still screwed over the entire ranked system big time. Some people who played early season basically got a 700 lp boost. Thats a ridiculous amount to climb with a negative winrate, after being stuck in the same rank for several seasons. Im not sure ill play ranked this season, but then again, i dont like the stress and random teamates, and it doesnt mean that much to me anymore, like its done previously.

Barcid3 votes

Rank means more than you think just due to MMR.

You can reach 2500 MMR winning all the time in Gold. Good job! You have a 90% winrate in Gold!

In Gold!

In fucking Gold.

If you're winning often against Golds, that doesn't immediately translate to you winning regularly against high Plats and Diamonds. You can spike your MMR playing against incompetent people only to realize you know absolutely nothing about playing against/with anyone with half a brain when you get matched with them.

MMR needs to either be reigned in a bit or there need to be better restrictions on rankings, plain and simple.

Jamaree19 votes

[{quoted}](name=Toxic Control,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZK4ygAi6,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2019-04-24T09:52:54.682+0000)

Rank means more than you think just due to MMR.

You can reach 2500 MMR winning all the time in Gold. Good job! You have a 90% winrate in Gold!

In Gold!

In fucking Gold.

It is literally not possible to have that high of a winrate and stay in gold with that MMR.

If you're winning often against Golds, that doesn't immediately translate to you winning regularly against high Plats and Diamonds. You can spike your MMR playing against incompetent people only to realize you know absolutely nothing about playing against/with anyone with half a brain when you get matched with them.

Well it's what people want, give it to them, let them reap what they sow.

Diabeatmeat3 votes

Nice! This guy has challenger MMR from Season 6 by dodging his games and getting his LP taken away.

I guess this is a relevant post because yes you can have that high of a WR but only if you continue to dodge your LP throughout the day.

Mr Elessar1 votes

Yes, dodging doesn't reduce MMR.

Jamaree1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Mr Elessar,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZK4ygAi6,comment-id=0001000100000001,timestamp=2019-04-24T15:58:04.620+0000)

It's possible: https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/55uhhx/bronze_5_with_challenger_mmr_ama/

If you intentionally are dodging yes, but if you straight have a 90% win rate, then no.

Joseraph1 votes

Ideservechallenjour.jpeg

Starcraft243ver8 votes

This is not possible because if you spike at 2500 MMR and you are still gold (by dodging promos for example), you will play against diamond people despite being gold.

The ranks are totaly ignored by the matchmaking to match you with and against your teammates, it only uses your hidden mmr.

Ragnaveil1 votes

When this account was in d3 (before a certain asshole in my match decided to throw a game away because they weren't the carry), I didn't see a single d3 besides my self. There were more plat 1s in my matches than d4s, and its nuts. How do they honestly expect people to climb? lol

Literal IRL Tree1 votes

Would u prefer season 4/5 or earlier when it was common for a game to be lost when Master/Challengers got matched with diamonds of all ranks extremely often? Games would be literally over based on how many D5s were on the team pretty much because of the skill difference between d5 and d2 let alone d5 and Chally

Ragnaveil1 votes

I mean, s6 s7 were fine at one point, then shit got changed so now mmr determines it and its honestly just as bad tbh.

Bob the Toastr1 votes

If rank literally means nothing then try queuing up with someone more than a division higher or lower than you.

Then tell me rank means nothing.

Jamaree2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Bob the Toastr,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZK4ygAi6,comment-id=00010002,timestamp=2019-04-24T16:17:54.652+0000)

If rank literally means nothing then try queuing up with someone more than a division higher or lower than you.

Then tell me rank means nothing.

I mean that rank means nothing when it comes to matching up players.

Dameshi1 votes

Which begs the question: Is there a point to the rank system at all? Would it be better to do away with rank and only have MMR Or Do away with MMR and match solely by rank?

Jamaree1 votes

{quoted}

Which begs the question: Is there a point to the rank system at all? Would it be better to do away with rank and only have MMR Or Do away with MMR and match solely by rank?

Both of those have problems, if it is just mmr, we are back to the elo problem where people will go on win and lose streaks because variance and be at elos they don’t deserve to be at.

If we have pure rank, it will have cases of players who are incredibly good but because of the them not being able to hit their target rank through promos they will be stuck there for longer.

I think what we have now is good on paper but the execution is flawed.

MMR shouldn’t be hidden at all especially when it is the system that actually shows who you get matched with, and it’s stupid that you have to use a third party site to take a guess at it.

The only con I’m seeing is that people will manipulate their MMR to stay being able to play with friends but if they are doing that and purposely losing, they should be getting banned anyway.

TL DR, keep system, be more transparent, stop hiding MMR

Kai Guy1 votes

Yea. It distracts players. Most folks would be upset to see their MMR only ever sink. About 50% of the base is expected to do just that.

also you can set higher MMR gains/losses have a bigger K factor and try to lower the # of starting games to get players to a Range of play thats closer to their skill.

And you can have dodge not be a way to bleed away MMR as LP does not make matches.

Ambitious Minnow1 votes

{quoted}

Which begs the question: Is there a point to the rank system at all? Would it be better to do away with rank and only have MMR Or Do away with MMR and match solely by rank?

Surely two systems is stupid and redundant. It would be amazing to just play games where everyone in my have was at my rank. My vote hands down would just be ranks. Start everyone at zero points on fresh account, let point gain/loss be Flay for every game and every account. Make matches based on rank only.

K3ars3n9 votes

The mental gymnastics required by some of you to excuse Riot as well as Riot themselves explaining all of these 'phenomenon' is incredible.

Nea1044 votes

Really, it's both admirable and sad.

Raiyza8 votes

System sucks, time to move on. That is all.

Sir Saltarin7 votes

Post the real source so we can see that it's a ranked game and not a normal

Glauciane5 votes

[{quoted}](name=Sir Saltarin,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZK4ygAi6,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-04-24T10:39:28.199+0000)

Post the real source so we can see that it's a ranked game and not a normal

https://imgur.com/CRkMlq1 you CANNOT post other people username having poor performance on boards without getting your post deleted. There you go, nerd.

Eedat1 votes

If you blur out everyone's names but your own it doesn't get removed. Then we're can just op.gg it.

flaming5 votes

Everyone will use MMR as an excuse but don't believe that bs. A few weeks ago in Gold 2 I faced a 60% winrate Plat 4 and had a 30% winrate Silver 1 on my team.

Matchmaking is just terrible.

CytheGuy4 votes

The silver 3 is probably duo-q with one of the Gold 2 players, who allowed matchmaking to place a gold 1 in the game, who allowed matchmaking to place a plat 4 in the game. Matchmaking is more concerned with making the total elos of two teams equal to each other, which is something we can deduce by noticing that op.gg tells us the average ranks of each team, which are pretty close to each other.

I (s2, deranked recently from s1) duo with my friend (g4-3 at any given time) and I play with people on his level and a little higher (1-2 divisions), which makes me play against g1s. The system won't make games be matched on your level (if you are the one who is duo queued) because then your partner could just stomp and carry, so it places you more around his level and a little under. If you want to climb by being carried by a duo queue, you better be prepared to carry your own weight first.

Black focks3 votes

Keep up on your op.gg when you're playing and you'll see rank doesn't matter. the person at s3 can play with bronze 3 players if they're mmr is bad but if it's good they'll find themselves playing with higher tier players.

Saianna1 votes

All you say is correct, but if you look at the scores of that plat player you see he pretty much stomped the opposition, so it wasn't really equal skill.

The whole MMR argument really shatters when there's obvious skill difference.

What's more both plat and silver were ADCs, which means they faced against each other in the same lane. Sorry mate, but that argument doesn't hold at all.

Black focks1 votes

Prolly means the player that is s3 has high elo. or the plat player has low elo. Mean i don't know 100% but that is the only way i can see it.

FireDrizzle1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Black focks,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ZK4ygAi6,comment-id=000500000000,timestamp=2019-04-24T13:36:07.724+0000)

Prolly means the player that is s3 has high elo. or the plat player has low elo. Mean i don't know 100% but that is the only way i can see it.

No, I was playing with 29% wr silver while plat once.

Jerry SeinfeId3 votes

Rank means absolutely nothing. Yet riot refuses to get rid of it in favour of just a ladder based on MMR.

Imo ppl should just be matched on rank and purely on ranl, or the ladder and end of season rewards should purely be based on MMR.

Banuvan3 votes

Riot has never and will never admit they messed up ranked years ago. They don't listen. They do what they want. Get over it. They will never listen to their player base in regards to ranked being complete crap for years. Just look at dynamic queue and positional ranks. They were told they were shit. They still messed ranked up with them.

Matchmaking has been shit for years as well. Instead of making it simple they made it worse.

They need to pick MMR or ranking system.

MMR - play people +/- 50 MMR of you. Go up like usual.

Rank - play people in your rank or higher and no higher than 2 ranks up. Get rid of promos or get rid of the stupid fucking forced 50% win/loss bullshit. If you keep promos then you play against people in the next rank up ( i.e. silver 1 plays with and against gold 5s ). If you get rid of promos and you get rid of the stupid fucking 50% forced win/loss ( yes, they do enforce this by putting you at a bigger and bigger disadvantage each game after you go on a win streak ) and when people hit 100 LP they go to the next rank.

There Riot. I fixed matchmaking and ranked for you. Now get your heads out of your asses and fix this stupid garbage you call ranked play.

FireDrizzle2 votes

You are either going 10+ votes on this or the usual morons view it and you get -20. Its best not too take even _ranked _ seriously mate.

Kai Guy2 votes

On the topic. Its not really to shocking to see Silver vs plat. Duo que is not implemented all to well which everbody seems to ignore no matter how many times I bring this up.

MMR for gold can be in plat. MMR for silver can be in bronze. In worst case situations, thou admittedly fringe cases, MM has to try and account for the MMR gap between a Bronze and Plat player.. A massive % of players in the game. Looking at League of Graphs My personal estimation is the very worst case duo can result in MMR range gap that accounts for 81.94% of the games players, possibly I have potentially overvalued MMR gains and over estimating it by 8.01%.

Good luck making a quality match with that. Some one explaind some of the impact on top and bottom that restricting Duoing to MMR would cause but I feel its a fair requirement for standard Elo ranges. Imo players in Bronze to Plat wouldn't suffer if Duo became restricted to the same MMR ranges MM used to make a fair game. No Gold 1 duoing with silver 4 unless they operated in the same hidden MMR range MM uses for solo players, or close to that value.

CenturKYN2 votes

It's really sad, at first I thought it just happened in d+ because of the low amount of players there, but when I started playing in this acc I just realized the matchmaking is completely fucked. I don't know how many times have I been matched with just dinged lv 30 accs or players with my same rank and 30% win rate. Those people run it down or afk because they don't care about the game, but somehow they still keep a balanced mmr.

On the other hand, I've been matched a few times with high gold players in d3 and yes, they have an insane win rate and whatnot, but it's not a big deal to get an insanely high ratio in gold, even more with the low amount of games they have, they could've been lucky.

I honestly don't even know why we have autofill if the matchmaker is gonna queue everyone together anyway within few seconds nor do I really understand why would Riot touch the SoloQ ranked ladder YET AGAIN after the constant failures in previous seasons, considering no one has ever complained about it.

Sukishoo1 votes

Ever since Iron and Grandmaster were added, the ladder got all screwed up.

Raiyza3 votes

No, it was before that.

xAcidik1 votes

A gold was duo with the silver on one team and another gold was duo with the plat. The only way to fix something like that is to restrict duos to just being in the same league.

Sinister Anubis1 votes

Was this in flex or soloduo?

HKT Saber1 votes

It's to prevent people from playing at a great difference in MMR gap. There are exceptions such as pros in low elo and high elo players occasionally having a really low MMR, but it stops most of the problem, as it is rare for Iron players to be in Diamond elo. Oh, and yes it exists. Here's the youtube link with timestamp to opgg just because I don't feel like taking a screenshot. https://youtu.be/MQ4r2ybRxWU?t=17

Morticianjohn1 votes

Regardless of mmr silver should not have to face plat and vice versa. There are enough players that this should not be a thing

FrozenFitzgerald1 votes

Because fuck Riot. They will deny to their last breath that matchmaking is bad while they do nothing about horrible, shitty people who ruin games. Their matchmaking is terrible, their support agents are irreverent assholes, and their polices are as ass backwards as possible.

For the record, normals are even more fucked up. My account is a transfer and had no normal solo games, maybe three premades. My only solo queue normal game puts me against a challenger player, and no he was not duo with anybody. And Riot support has defended that to my face, telling me there is nothing wrong with matchmaking (And also telling me that op.gg is wrong, even though when you look at his profile in the league client he is grandmaster, with the exact same stats op.gg displayed).

Hammermancer1 votes

if i saw the op.gg i couldn't even get mad at the poor guy, he signed up for a silver matchup not a plat lane opponent

did he try his best?

ForgetMeNotKeanu1 votes

The percent is not KDA. Your math isn’t even correct. The percentage it shows is kill participation.

ESeTyRC1 votes

Repeating what I've been told when bringing this kind of issue up: MMR is what rly matters!!1!1!!

As if that changes the fact that a Silver CANT duo with Plat, or the fact that a Bronze CANT duo with Gold.

Maybe Ranks should actually reflect the MMRs..

KirbyCake1 votes

{quoted}

Repeating what I've been told when bringing this kind of issue up: MMR is what rly matters!!1!1!!

As if that changes the fact that a Silver CANT duo with Plat, or the fact that a Bronze CANT duo with Gold.

Maybe Ranks should actually reflect the MMRs..

Will never happen. The reason we have leagues instead of a numerical rating is to make you grind long and hard for the rank you deserve as opposed in like 20 games.

More from Gameplay

More by Glauciane