Is Rito partially to blame for League's toxic community?
Circa seasons 3 or 4 (ish) they were doing experiments, specific controlled experiments on us, the players, to see if they could modify negative behavior. PhD and all. On paper they claimed minor statistical improvements but nothing groundbreaking. The results of those experiments led in a very meandering way to the punishment system we have today.
Discounting the a5--kissers that ride high horses around the forums, mocking players that post questions about player behavior and punishments- does anyone think the following scenario is reasonable for punishing Player 3:
""""""""""""""""""""""""" Player 1: you suck, uninstall re--rd Player 2: sorry enemy team that you have to play with player 3, they are trash Player 3: I know you guys are trying to troll, but I have the best score on my team so you can give up """"""""""""""""""""""""""
According to Rito, Player 3 is wrong because referencing scores in chat can be construed as toxic behavior. Almost zero gray area within League. If the trolls on the other team reported, the system could flag it as toxic behavior. I say probably because I'm by no means an expert on it.
Now overlay that abusive chat situation onto thousands of hours of gameplay- trolls like players 1 and 2 are quite common still. You either mute the /all chat and your own team, or learn to live with it. Most of us choose to live with it because a.) you can't mute real life and b.) we enjoy the occasional fun discussions (however rare they are). And trolls will never stop because .. hey it only takes 2 minutes to sign up again, worst case.
That said, when many good players endure verbal abuse constantly, and with zero option to even make an unemotional, rational response (like above) without risk of punishment, is it any surprise players finally blow their top?
You could argue that we are equipped to mute verbally abusive players. But it doesn't erase the original abusive moment, the residual anger, anxiety, etc. The continued taunting in game spamming laugh, dance, emotes, etc. Or the lingering effect it has on your own teammates and collective morale, especially if on your own team. And multiplied over hundreds of games, it will wear on you. It isn't human nature to be a punching bag for others amusement or satisfaction, and most games (in my experience) will forgive a player responding to another abusive player with something relatively fair (obviously nothing like "go kill yourself.")
I still play the game, and I think like most players its a love/hate arrangement with League anymore. I've always run into trolls in all games. Its human nature I'd speculate, that given anonymity, an adolescent or young adult will let slip their poor behavior, insults, childish actions..
But punishing the abused players to such an extent feels like it has cultivated a quietly seething population of usually positive, helpful players.. all waiting for a couple bad games, or just one more jerk of a player before they snap and cross the arbitrary line that Rito drew in the sand. Rito has conditioned them to be victims and nothing more.
This probably won't get much attention, and half of the 3 comments I expect will be negative. But I'm willing to engage in both supportive and counter arguments on the subject.