Social Experiment: Theoretically, let's say Teemo got a healthy rework
No, this is not a thread asking for Teemo buffs.
(This isn't even specifically about Teemo, but about the community and their opinion on general champion balance/rebalance)
Something I've been wondering about, especially whenever I read threads (anywhere, not just these boards) about assassins or other things people deem "toxic".
Now, few people call Teemo flat-out overpowered as he doesn't have the same late-game and teamfighting presence as most champs, but just about everyone calls him "toxic", "anti-fun", the Satan of League, etc. due to his laning power especially against AA-reliant tops, and late-game mushrooms.
Bashing Teemo is just a standard, traditional thing the community does. (Although.. even Teemo will be defended by fans sometimes)
So the question I pose in this thread: If Riot took Teemo and redesigned him, giving him a healthier (and relatively weaker) laning phase as well as rebalancing his late-game and teamfighting, and he ended up being a fair and balanced champion, the community wouldn't change their opinion on him at all, would they?
, and it's fair to say that he was deliberately designed to be annoying (though likely not outright toxic, which he unfortunately happens to be). If anything, any announcement of a rework would likely spur a new wave of Teemo-bashing, equal parts light-hearted celebration and genuine hatred.
" is still commonly used, despite the last real nerf to Irelia being in 2012 (she even got buffed), and even now people still call for reversions to game states from years ago (e.g. reverting
's relaunch, bringing back Force of Nature, etc.), despite how far we've gone from them. Hating on Teemo is always going to be fashionable, regardless of how healthy his eventual rework will make him.