I've read your response, and from the information which you've presented, it appears as if:
A) You've misunderstood the paragraphs and incidentally are not able to grasp the central point of arguement well enough or
B) Your using pre-subjective thought of disapproval for the entire thread, which may had been a result from reading the title alone, henceforth, not properly interpreting any sentence at all afterwards.
This may explain why "so much is wrong" for you and likewise, the second paragraph not making sense to you. I agree that some people should be polite when they're requesting to see a champion become buffed, nerfed, or even halted on a rework but you and I know that isn't the case most of the times. Whether a person is "rude" or not, they're still a part of the community and always have been. This means, the majority still stands whether we like it or not.
Let me give you an example before I further elaborate on this. You own a banquet hall! Your business is predicated on the catering of your customers and the commerce between you and them (same exact example as the player base and Rito). As the owner, you've purchased 2 mounted stereos on a tripod and have convinced all your customers to not move or touch it at all, not even your employees! Some of your customers become frustrated due to the stereo positioning, and subsequently, they make ad hominem remarks against you. Few others have brought up their concern with an impulsive attitude about the stereo positioning and have requested for you to move it; fewer others have brought up the issue in a polite manner according to your point of view to move the stereo. After reflection, hearing, and even peer review analysis, you've realized that the majority of your customers want to see the 2 mounted stereos removed from the banquet hall. Now, you as the corporate boss of this banquet hall, if you choose to ignore their request for too long, what do you think will happen?
It's the same concept. Now back to your factual points. When you speak about "bitching and moaning," you must obviously be speaking figuratively, and undoubtedly, you mean complaining. But here is where you're wrong! Their is feedback! In fact, people have posted multiple screenshots of team scores, champion statistics via lolmatchhistory screen shot and many more as to the reason why certain changes are required, but never get fulfilled until months, or even a year(s*)! It is not very small if every patch release webpage, someone is asking why such and such champion is being nerfed or why this item is being nerfed and i can go on and on. I'll give you perfect evidence! http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/patch/patch-612-notes and on the bar that says comments sorted by, click recent and see all those comments against reworks and the patch itself. It's not the minority that are complaining, it's the majority! Swallow reality and realize that it is more then a minority bringing up the issue!
I honestly do not know why you brought your former quote paragraph up! That just furthered my case and point that Dynamic queue was heavily favored more by players then re-opening solo queue. If you ask me it was irrelevant to bring that up because even I made the same conclusion about it. So there is no need to address something I agree, my thread agrees with, and which they've enacted. I'm talking about the countless other things which the majority of the player base requested and do not make it into live servers, such as 1v1 lava chamber, in-game voice chat (which was requested by the majority since 2012 and even today, but still hasn't been implemented into the server). So many more things.
Now for the rework scenerio. Did you know that the new reworked taric's popularity in all regions as a bottom lane support, and even top lane, has dropped significantly when compared to his old kit? That is a big issue! If you don't believe me, here is my evidence: http://www.lolking.net/charts?region=all&type=bottom-synergy&range=daily&map=sr&queue=1x1&league=ranked so that already destroys your arguement that he's a great rework when he's been seeing a dramatic decline in gameplay all throughout every region, especially after his post rework. Urgot was on the list of rework since 2013 so don't even bring him up until we actually see him get reworked! People have requested to see him get reworked even before all of these champions that are getting theirs, and still till this day no one has taken the effort to shed some light or even attempt to make changes to him.
And now the last paragraph. Wow you act so entitled. People fought bled and died so you could have democracy. Riot and its relationship is not a democracy and shouldn't be. Just like nintendo and their fans. These are businesses not countries.
I had every respect for you as an individual expressing their thought until this last comment. This was totally uncalled for, BS, and contradictory to your own statement. First and foremost I was speaking figuratively. Since when do politics and video games go hand in hand? This was to emphasis my statement about voting before implementing in game changes. Not electing the president of sales or anything of that nature in the corporate chain. Before you maroon yourself in an uninhabited island thinking that Rito is there, don't forget that Rito games IS LOCATED IN NORTH AMERICA, which is a DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY! Nonetheless, this was again, one of your horrible pre-subjective translation of the actual sentence. And then you have the nerve to say I was acting so entitled when in fact, I said "we," live in a democratic country and not "I." If a business operates in a country, then it obviously has federal laws which it must follows! You're trying to put it in a context that a business can do w.e the heck they want without following any government laws, which is wrong, but no more of this. It'll further confuse you since I doubt you're smart to intellectually grasp the comment that follows after this last comment! And please for the love of whatever you believe in, do not compare Nintendo to Rito, likewise their fanbase! Nintendo makes games for fans. Nintendo responds to their fans, especially if their is an unwanted change in any of there game. Nintendo fans contribute to Nintendo and are satisfied with their contributions. Nintendo get's player feedback as they promote, create, or dispose of game materials. Does Rito do any of that? NO! So if you're going to go into the defense of a business that clearly closes the bathroom door on you and wipes your money with their gravy coming out of their behind, then maybe it's about time to confront them on that matter instead of defending them you Vanilla Fappuccino