Skip to content

Flash should not be a summoner spell.

oO Hawke Oo··3 votes·984 views

Hear me out. summoner 4

Flash should not be a summoner spell. It should be a built in ability. Everyone should have 2 summoner spells AND flash (Or the choice between flash and ghost).

In every game of 10 people I play with, 80-90% of them are running flash. 99% of them are running some combination of flash/ghost.

In the design world, that is referred to as a dominant strategy. It means that there is no actual choice. Unless you play with flash (or ghost) you are deliberately nerfing yourself. Of course there are some weird situations that you might not take either of them, but those situations are so rare we will not even worry about them.

The reality is that everyone takes flash or ghost. So why not give it to everyone. It's a false choice. If you gave everyone the choice of Flash or ghost and then allowed them 2 actual summoners to choose between then you will have protected the new players from making a bad choice and introduced some diversity into summoner spell selection.

Discuss:

-Hawke

17 Comments

Gary B Enkelis1 votes

Interesting....

Instead changing the game to allow 2 Summoner Spells + summoner 4 / summoner 6 could we say the current game is really 1 Summoner Spell + summoner 4 / summoner 6 ?

I mean why do we need or want 2 Summoner Spells + summoner 4 / summoner 6 instead of 1?

Like take your idea and subtract 1 from the choice of Summoner Spells and we have the current system basically? With the exception of like Shaco with summoner 11 summoner 14 ...

I dunno. Your post is interesting though.

Eternal 7 1 votes

I dont take flash anyways o3o , so ... it doesnt effect meh , Exhaust / ignite is all i use

[slayer-jinx-catface]

Pierce The Veal1 votes

Let's not make it ghost vs flash. Just take flash and make it a permanent third summoner spell. Ghost is actually a choice more often than not, and usually doesn't end up being nearly as toxic as flash.

Gary B Enkelis1 votes

I mean what if we reduced the number of Summoner Spells to 1 and then everyone got summoner 4 for free? It's basically the current game. Having an extra Summoner Spell (like taking summoner 14 summoner 3 summoner 4 ) would be interesting but do we need it?

Pierce The Veal1 votes

{quoted}

I mean what if we reduced the number of Summoner Spells to 1 and then everyone got summoner 4 for free? It's basically the current game. Having an extra Summoner Spell (like taking summoner 14 summoner 3 summoner 4 ) would be interesting but do we need it?

Not really tbh, but it adds an extra factor to the game. But why would we reduce the choices to one and force flash? That beats the point of this all! What if I want ghost exhaust?

Gary B Enkelis1 votes

It's basically the point of the topic, I think. Reducing the spells to 1 and giving everyone an option of summoner 4 summoner 6 is basically the current system and the system proposed is the current system + 1 spell.

Yeah an extra factor is added but do we need that? It'd be interesting, definitely.

Pierce The Veal1 votes

{quoted}

It's basically the point of the topic, I think. Reducing the spells to 1 and giving everyone an option of summoner 4 summoner 6 is basically the current system and the system proposed is the current system + 1 spell.

Yeah an extra factor is added but do we need that? It'd be interesting, definitely.

Obviously you haven't seen the exhaust smite, exhaust ignite, ignite smite, ghost ignite, ghost exhaust combos.

Gary B Enkelis1 votes

I have, though. If you look at my post from 10 hours ago in this same topic.

In fact it's like the very first reply to this topic. Obviously you didn't bother to read every comment.

Pierce The Veal1 votes

{quoted}

I have, though. If you look at my post from 10 hours ago in this same topic.

In fact it's like the very first reply to this topic. Obviously you didn't bother to read every comment.

Obviously I'm supposed to read every comment in this thread and remember who posted what.

Gary B Enkelis1 votes

Well you were wrong, obviously.

Pierce The Veal1 votes

{quoted}

Well you were wrong, obviously.

Yet despite seeing those combos you still think it's a good idea to lock one of the summoners as flash. While I might have been wrong, you have flawed reasoning that makes you think that it is ok to just slash all these strategies that apparently you know exist.

Gary B Enkelis1 votes

What? I don't even remember. Anyway, you said something about me that was clearly wrong. You're welcome to your other opinions. I'm wrong a lot so you may be on to something, but earlier you were obviously dead wrong.

I don't have an opinion one way or another about the number of summoner spells. If we had 1 less it wouldn't bother me any more than having 1 more.

I really don't give a hoot.

Wh1teWu1f1 votes

Interesting idea, would be cool to maybe play around with and maybe even try in season 7 (probably season 8 since they need to make up for this season). The difficulty with this becomes that you have to slightly rebalance all the other summoner spells since you'd be allowed to take summoner 1 summoner 7 which could be ridiculously safe for ADCs imo. Combine that with the fact that their supports will probably be bringing summoner 3 summoner 7 (obviously you could take summoner 14 instead of summoner 3, but that's the same variance you have now). The other roles would have some interesting combinations, but I'm sure someone could think of something that would be pretty good and become standard.

Like I said, it's a good idea, but would definitely take some tweaking to work out all the qwerks it could lead to.

Woodakoodashooda1 votes

But the "dominant strategy" as you put it is applicable to every role in the game.

Jungle cannot jungle without smite.

Most mid take ignite.

Most support take exhaust.

Most adc take heal.

Most top take either ignite or teleport.

The variety of what spells are used is generally dictated by role.

Cleanse is rarely if ever used anymore and Barrier is a niche spell.

Flash is almost always needed. And providing a third free spell simply because of one spell's popularity is the wrong direction. The "dominant strategy" or meta would not disappear, it would simply change.

oO Hawke Oo1 votes

Kid Kanji: I laud you. I too used to avoid flash (because everyone told me I had to have it and I wanted to prove them wrong). Ultimately it just made me have to compensate for being weaker.

Bimclunk: Our current system is, for all intents and purposes, exactly as you describe it: summoner 4 /summoner 6 + one summner spell. Doing anything else is sub-optimal. I suggested summoner 4 /summoner 6 + 2 because I assumed that the original game design offered two summoners to allow some diversity in summoner choices, something we don't really see right now. Adding a little more complexity and using more of the summoner spells could potentially make the game more interesting.

While it would make early engages harder, keep in mind that if bot had: summoner 4 summoner 7 summoner 3 on the support and summoner 4 summoner 7 summoner 21 on the adc, it's possible that the jungle would be running summoner 4 summoner 11 summoner 14 or summoner 3 to make the gank more likely to succeed. Or 5 summoner 12 comps are now viable, so if the enemy started barron, suddenly everyone is TPing to the hidden ward that the enemies tried to clear but didn't see. Maybe mid runs summoner 13 as well as summoner 14 , so Galio can be a little more aggressive in-lane without the worries of running out of mana quite so much. Now you have meaningful choices.

Chocolate Frost: The difference between the jungler requiring smite and everyone requiring flash is that the designers deliberately chose to have smite be required to jungle. The sacrifice to jungling is losing one of your summoners to gain the extra experience and gold from the jungle camps. While most times people take summoners by role, there are meaningful choices that can be made at each spot. Mid could just as easily take barrier (Veigar, Vel-Koz), or Teleport (for those tele-ganks). ADC could take ignite instead of heal if partnered with a support who has healing.

Flash doesn't allow a meaningful choice. You either take it or you are significantly less powerful than everyone else.

Flash (or ghost) being mandatory is not a design choice, it's how the game has evolved. It's not that everyone can take it, it's that everyone SHOULD take it. It's disguised as a meaningful choice, but it isn't. Failure to take it is a competitive disadvantage for you.

It's like the homeguard augment on boots. They were taken so frequently that the designers simply decided to add their functionality at the 20-minute mark whether you have boots or not, so now everyone has homeguards.

If an item or ability is so dominant that everyone needs to take it to be competitive, it is not balanced and should either brought into line power-wise with the other choices that you are given for that resource, or simply given to everyone by default. Since nerfing flash will never actually bring it in line with the other summoners without making it nigh-useless, it makes more sense to simply add it as part of the default summoner abilities.

-Hawke

ChickenMaster251 votes

This is the thing, if Riot ever change something so major like this (changing from 2 summoner spells to 3), the community will go absolutely crazy. Remember when mana potions were still here and they removed it? Damn, visited Boards that day and holy crap, so many people are quitting because of that and complaining and all those stuff.

Riot isn't powerful. The community is.

EDIT: Anyways, its just a discussion. I think I like having just two summoner spells :)

Astôlfo1 votes

lol fuck no.

More from Gameplay

More by oO Hawke Oo