The grading system for games continues to bamboozle me.

Tonakide·Aug 2, 2017·1 votes·312 views

This will come off as me just trying to brag about a game, but it's not. I'm genuinely curious what algorithms and calculations go into rating games.

I recently had a game as Kassadin where I went 21/2/10 with 178 CS and 41k damage done, which came out as an A+.

A phenomenal Warwick on our team went 12/4/12 with 162 CS and 22k damage done, which came out as an S-.

He deserved what he got, but I feel unsatisfied. What stats gave him an S and held mine back? Thanks.

2 Comments

Sp33d Zer0Aug 2, 20173 votes

You get graded based off your performance compared against other players who have played that champion in that role.

He got more cs, probably warded more, and hard a kill participation than the average warwick by my guess.

On the flip side, you had similar cs to a jungler, who is supposed to have lower cs than almost everyone.

Ex: A guy posted that he had mastery 7 on every single champion in the game. He stated he got 3 S+ in a row by playing jungle kassadin. As there is not a huge bench mark around jungle kassadin, even a half decent performance is high enough to rate an S for that game.

TonakideAug 2, 20171 votes

Thank you so much!