The grading system for games continues to bamboozle me.

Tonakide·8/2/2017, 10:59:12 PM·1 votes·312 views

This will come off as me just trying to brag about a game, but it's not. I'm genuinely curious what algorithms and calculations go into rating games.

I recently had a game as Kassadin where I went 21/2/10 with 178 CS and 41k damage done, which came out as an A+.

A phenomenal Warwick on our team went 12/4/12 with 162 CS and 22k damage done, which came out as an S-.

He deserved what he got, but I feel unsatisfied. What stats gave him an S and held mine back? Thanks.

2 Comments

Sp33d Zer08/2/2017, 11:01:16 PM3 votes

You get graded based off your performance compared against other players who have played that champion in that role.

He got more cs, probably warded more, and hard a kill participation than the average warwick by my guess.

On the flip side, you had similar cs to a jungler, who is supposed to have lower cs than almost everyone.

Ex: A guy posted that he had mastery 7 on every single champion in the game. He stated he got 3 S+ in a row by playing jungle kassadin. As there is not a huge bench mark around jungle kassadin, even a half decent performance is high enough to rate an S for that game.