@Meddler Riot, I take it back, and I give you my respect for the ranked changes.

LatetotheRace·10/6/2016, 3:06:01 AM·2 votes·265 views

"We always want players to have the ability to play competitively as a group, but we'll give up our dream of a competitive "dynamic" queue if players don't think it's worth their time."

This, this, THIS oh my gosh riot. I just... I cannot explain my satisfaction with this, nor can I express my gratitude.

That being said, I do have some ideas to help y'all get both queues working at a decent level.

"All queues need solo players to survive. Not necessarily. If the lack of solo players creates an issue, you can always create 2 new queues which may satisfy more players overall. My suggestion is pure solo Q, and "flex" queue or whatever you want to call it. Ranked solo will obviously be 1 player testing his might against others, while flex will be groups of 2-3 and 5. Yes you won't be able to have a 4 man group, but that's better than losing both 3 and 4 man groups in favor of ranked duo and teams. I feel that this will benefit more players and likely create more satisfaction and interest in ranked as a whole.

-One last time though, thanks for putting your EGO aside and accepting what he player base asked for. We really just didn't like what y'all did to ranked and I think I speak for all the solo players out there, so thank you for being accepting of others. We put up several serious shit storms, myself included, but you were patient with us and you rode it out.

0 Comments