Ranked Questions?

Do anyone think that dumping 30 percent of players in silver and 30 percent in bronze really shows an accurate picture of how well people play the game? How is anyone that has won lets say 75 games and has a win percentage of 45 in bronze V?? what does bronze V really reflect, you can't say that they are the absolute worst of the worst. They certainly are not good. But, to say they are the worst of the worst might be a bit of a stretch? Do you think that would really reflect how they play in relation to other players.

If someone is in bronze 5 how come they cant lose their ranked status. Shouldn't any rank be at least something the person could take a little bit of pride in. Like if you fall out of ranked you should be only able to access normal games, like a 20 game ban or something, until you can be ready to do your placements over again.

Should player reports (good or bad) play how much LP you lose in a loss? probably a bad idea...

How are players supposed to know what types of performance are typical of each division? Seems like there is no other criteria other than your winrate that you can have to say what rank you are in.

Is there harm in a letting players reach Gold and evening out the distribution? Let people have some sort of reward for the time they spend on the game:(