Boards›Gameplay

State of the Game - Balancing Marksmen

Recons··32 votes·1,975 views

Lately I have seen a lot of complains about the current state of Marksmen in the game. A lot of people claim Marksmen deal too much damage, and have too much Life Steal. In my opinion, you are not wrong, at least not entirely. To understand this we need to go back to the role of Marksmen.

What are Marksmen?

Marksmen are ranged sustained damage dealers, they are supposed to deal the most damage per second when ignored, and should succumb easily to crowd-control, zoning and burst damage. They have to itemize intelligently, choosing to sacrifice Damage-Per-Second (DPS) for survivability.

Marksmen also serve as effective siege tools, able to damage structures from afar, and are the most suitable to build armor penetration on, since they can utilize their range as a safety barrier, because armor penetration items provide no survivability stats.

So, what? Marksmen are OP OP

Well, here is my opinion on how to balance Marksmen, which will also cascade into other roles, in order to accommodate the change.

  1. Marksmen should have the most DPS when not interrupted.
  • This means Marksmen should itemize effectively with Attack Speed items.
  • This also means Marksmen should not be able to deal large amounts of damage when interrupted.
  1. Marksmen should be vulnerable to crowd-control, and burst.

  • This means Marksmen should not have insane sustain. Life Steal is not an ability Marksmen should have, it should be an ability Juggernauts and Fighters have.

  • This also means Marksmen should sacrifice DPS in order to build defensive items that mitigate these weaknesses, not increase their DPS, items like item 3139 and item 3053 should feel really bad on Marksmen

  1. Marksmen are not Assassin's they should not be able to one-shot any one, literally anyone. This should be relegated to Assassins, and fed burst Mages (notice the caveat, FED and BURST mages).

  2. On the other hand, Marksmen should be the best at dealing with Tanks and Juggernauts. They should be able to reduce bonus Armor to nothing, dealing stable damage to Tanks and non-Tanks alike.

  • To achieve this Marksmen itemization should ideally be: a) Medium attack damage, or % Health Damage. b) No critical chance, at ALL this stat should be Assassin only. c) Attack Speed. d) Only % Bonus Armor reduction.

How does this all fit together?

Assassins should get access to high attack damage, critical chance, and flat armor reduction. These stats would make assassin more risk-reward characters. On the other hand, they would be useless against tanks, losing all % health damage and % armor reduction.

Juggernaut's and Fighters would get medium attack damage, % armor reduction over time, and life steal. Letting them stay in the fray more, dealing medium damage. Less vulnerable to burst.

Control Mages should get Medium Ability Power, % health damage and % magic resist reduction over time (Think of an AP item 3071 ), but they can't burst, and their DPS is limited by Cooldowns.

Burst mages would get flat MR reduction, and high-AP items, but higher Cooldowns, having to prioritize their spells correctly, or risk losing team-fights. And they should not focus tanks, or be able to one-shot tanks.

This leaves Marksmen to deal DPS, equally to all targets, % bonus armor reduction that increases over time, if left unchecked would mean they can deal the same damage to tanks and to non-tanks alike, they should also have high-attack speed, and medium mobility and damage. However they have no critical chance, which means they also can't one-shot squishies, and they don't have flat armor reduction.

Conclusion

This is just my opinion on how to redirect the meta, and roles in the game. Limiting % and flat resistance reduction by range or something like that could be a solution.

What do you think about this?

Do you agree with these ideas? And how would you change the meta?

83 Comments

Resolution24 votes

Honestly, I think itemization is where they went wrong. If you build complete damage it should mean Glass Cannon. There's way too many "Free" stats/bonuses on AD items that have made balancing them a nightmare.

It's not even about building smart anymore either. I remember there was risk/reward for building GA - survivability at the cost of damage late game. Now you get damage on top of those defensive stats/with little to no drawback. Not to mention the other items that give you random defensive traits while handing you massive offensive traits at the same time.

I feel like ADC should be based solely on positioning and smart play rather than out sustaining late game even if caught out.

Modern Support3 votes

I'd like to see overall nerfs to support instead of ADC the current problem lies in Knight's Vow, Stoneplate + Locket combo, Ardent Censer, Windspeakers (free MR & AR)

A potential nerf to carries could also be removing flat resistances from the mastery fearless which has been becoming the meta quite rapidly. Currently it provides 10% + 1.5 per level bonus AR & MR it should be toned down for users without resistances and buffed for tanks to compensate.

The change for fearless would be:

Gain 10% + 1.5 per level bonus Armor and Magic Resist -> Gain 20% bonus Armor and Magic resists

Ardent Censer has been a problem for a while as it gives both attack speed and on-hit damage. It currently procs in ARAM at not a reduced 50% effectiveness since it's a buff I'd like to see that changed. Riot has been nerfing champions based on runaans interactions so I wonder if runaans should go back to not procing on-hit on the bolts but be buffed to compensate. The bolts of runaans currently proc ardent censer so you gain 20-35 flat lifesteal per target hit with runaans your max targets hit with be 3 (max 60-105 current) ontop of any lifesteal they have at that time.

Stoneplate + Locket decays fast but it negates a lot of burst such as Syndra R, Zed R, Ori Combos, etc. Carries in this meta are hard to kill because tank and support items are absurdly strong. It currently doesn't desync with locket so they are within 4-5s of each others cooldown.

Stoneplate should receive the following change

Cooldown changed 90s -> 150 Statline adjusted 40 AR -> 50 AR Statline adjusted 40 MR -> 50 MR While near 3 enemies 40 AR & MR -> 30 AR & MR

Knight's vow is receiving slight nerfs on PBE so I'm interested in how it will play out the Hp on it is going from 300 -> 250.

3TWarrior1 votes

you might want to change that in case riot does not revert guardian angel or adjust the MR items to melee only

with a 20% increase to bonus instead of a flat increase to %, it would make it quite hard for mages to damage marksman while also allowing greater armor that although minor, would add up

Modern Support1 votes

It would be a nerf since you don't really itemization heavy MR you would need high amounts of MR to even come close. Currently the MR & AR is flat 1.5-27 based on level + 10% bonus.

To break even with the nerf you would need atleast a 450 MR item which would grant 5 MR vs 1.5 per level + 10%. ADCs normally only build 1-2 MR items Mercurial Scimitar and Maw. The suggested change would give you 9 MR vs (1.5-27 per level) if you have Maw and proc fearless. If you have Mercurial you would only get 7 MR vs (1.5-27 per level) if you have Mecurial. If you have both you would only have 16 MR~ vs (1.5-27 per level) so it would be a net nerf in all cases. With runes ADCs normally take 4-5 MR blues and 4-5 attack speed blues.

Yaskamasandwich12 votes

Crit needs to be removed flat out. It should have been during the marksmen update. Instead it was amplified. Sure it requires fixing some champions if it was removed like Tryndamere, Yasuo, Ashe, etc. but most of them need some fixing anyways. Only guaranteed critical strikes like Fiora's E or Jhin's 4th shot seem okay since it's not a constant thing.

As for the ramp up damage how do you plan on helping out the Marksmen whom are not good at it, like Jhin?

Kloqdq4 votes

I made a post about this before. Crit is too good late game and it's too random early. No way someone should win a fight because they managed to get 3 crit out of 5 attacks from 20% crit chance. I play GP and whenever I get a crit off just IE I feel dirty. Crit is a bad gimmick that should have been removed.

Ariel the Cruel1 votes

If you want dirty...

Sivir Bouncing blade crits. Caitlyn Headshot crits. Vayne Q crits.

Sire Hippington1 votes

Sivir offers somethign worse than the bounceing crit - double crit on the AA-reset is about as dirty as it gets with IE rush

Ariel the Cruel1 votes

I think you're missing what makes it dirty. Her E bounces indefinably until no unique targets are in range. Meaning she can potentially undo a monster wave and team push with 1 or 2 lucky crits. And unlike GP's barrels, the other team can't stop it. ;p

This makes her really dirty during a late-game base-push. Since she can potentially 1-shot all the minions when they spawn. XD

Sire Hippington1 votes

This makes her really dirty during a late-game base-push. Since she can potentially 1-shot all the minions when they spawn. XD

We are talking about the rng part here, not overall power of critscaleing. Sivir clearing waves is not random, it's once of the major reason to pick her and lategame, it is damn reliable as with enough ad, those 3 Ws will clear the wave even if you are really unlucky with the crits. However, haveing an IE rush sivir walking up to you and just dunking you with an instant doublecrit because RNGsus says so, THAT is dirty.

Ariel the Cruel1 votes

I'm also talking about RNGesus crits. Losing your minion wave at complete F'ing random because she got a crit on bouncing blade is infuriating as F.

Sire Hippington11 votes

There's just one thing i REALLY disagree with: 'Assassins should get access to high attack damage, critical chance...' IMO critical strike has no place at all in a competetive game like that. RNG based damage just should not exist! The only points going for it are the scaleing, which can be achived by other non rng means and is quite quetionable balance wise, and the statisfacion of high numbers+extra AA animation which couold be achived with more focus on energized effects or spellblade.

I think Marksmen should get much more ramp-up mechanics(Fervor and Guinsoo'S go in the right direction), giving more backloaded damage for extendet fights rather than upfront burst. It would be nice if LW items would give a per target debuff that ramps up bonus armorpen by 10% per hit, up to ~70, so if they can consitently hit away on one target, they shred through it, but if you can prevent that their damage isn't that impressive. I think Lifesteal is fine on them in general IF they are actually vulnerable to burst and cc, though the current amounts are a bit overtuned no matter what. However, the main issue with current lifesteal is that it also coutners burst, DD has the 30% delayed damage, BT has the overheal for effectively 350more maxhealth, Mercurial has mr and a fucking cleanse(really mercurial was the beginning of the end, if marksmen want an as powerfull defensive effect like QSS, they should pay for it instead of getting a butload of stats with it), and on top of that they get so much rotection from their kits and supports that it's near impossible to burst them if they and their team play properly. With all the protection(if they want, they can get 3 cleanse effects!! summoner 1 item 3139 item 3222), they really don't deserve lifesteal right now.

I also don't like forceing itemisation onto classes. It's fine when classes/champions can use different builts aslong as it's a choice with clear tradeoffs. i have no issue with marksmen going for lethality and high AD to boost their burst and poke, as long as they sacrifice their dps and tankshredding by doing so. I have no issue with mages going for High Ap+flat pen for burst if that means missing out on CDR and %pen for sustained impact. Same for about every class, as long as there is a clear tradeoff for a choosen path, there is nothing wrong with haveing multiple options. And this is one thing where Riot fails horrible since S5, they just streamline champs and entire classes into set item builts with just small room for variation(like which Zeal item to get), but they totally kill ofbuilts that enable alternate playstyles. And by now, Abillity Power should be renamed, back in the day, it did what it says, it increased the power of your abillities, wether you played YI, Tristana or Anivia. But now, most non mage champs have lost nearly all theri AP ratio or atleast got them reduced so far that it's no longer meanigfull in any way.

Overall, i feel aside from vision(or rather the lack thereof) and masteries(to a lesser extend by now), itemisation is the main issue of this game. Back when i truely loved league, items were mostly stat sticks with some passive effects. This may sound boring to some, but it has some really huge advantages: It puts all the focus on a champion's kit. Stats only amplify what's already there(well, exept for tankstats but one can also implement individual scaleings with those, as quite some tanks already have), so the strengths and weaknesses of a champions kit are more meaningfull. If you lacked waveclear, that was a meaningfull weakness that couldn't be compensated by just paying ~1000gold. If you wanted the cleanse from QSS, you sacrificed an itemslot for nothing but the active and some small MR. There were some item actives that broke that rule, like DFG, and that one was removed for exact that reason. But now? Items have so many powerfull effects that champions are defined by their items as much as by their kit. Supports feel mostly like item bearers that get those powerfull effects for their team(imo feels even worse than the aura bearers in S1/2), most burst mages go for a hextech item into lichbane/ludens (why did we remove dfg again??), and currently the combination of 3 ad-ish items grants about 1k extra burst just from active/passive effects on top of their stats(item 3147 item 3078 item 3748 , while also granting ward detection and waveclear... Same for adc, whats the point for playing sivir when her main strengths, aoe damage and waveclear, can be achived by any adc with item 3087 /item 3085? Even her ult can be simulated by an support item if really neededitem 3069 ...

Recons3 votes

I agree with the trade-off on itemization, I think items have power-creeped a bit too, while being cheaper overall.

Thanks for your input.

Telosen4 votes

Agreed with the point about crit.

Why is the solution to increasing late game damage to add random crits that deal double damage or more? ** Why cant crit be replaced with a stat that says, "Auto attacks deal 20% more damage" instead of "your auto attacks deal double damage 20% of the time". **

The average damage over time remains the same, but the randomness is now gone. This way ADCs can still ramp up and smash later but at no point in the game is anyone winning or losing fights based on random crits.

Ahristocats5 votes

i wonder why the board has such a boner with marksmen

marksmen ARE NOT THE FCKING PROBLEM RIGHT NOW, they do not need any kind of changes however league needs a better laning phase against ranged champions because ranged champions having 70 ad at lvl 1 is what makes marksmen going bot 100% of the time, well 99% of the time since morde can go bot

Recons5 votes

Marksman are definitely not the problem I agree, it's the entire game haha

HeresyHorus5 votes

Marksmen ARE the entire game period.

Muh flashy right click skills and pentas.

Hyrum Graff5 votes

{quoted}

Lately I have seen a lot of complains about the current state of Marksmen in the game. A lot of people claim Marksmen deal too much damage, and have too much Life Steal. In my opinion, you are not wrong, at least not entirely. To understand this we need to go back to the role of Marksmen.

Working from principals -- good approach :)

What are Marksmen?

Marksmen are ranged sustained damage dealers, they are supposed to deal the most damage per second when ignored, and should succumb easily to crowd-control, zoning and burst damage. They have to itemize intelligently, choosing to sacrifice Damage-Per-Second (DPS) for survivability.

Marksmen also serve as effective siege tools, able to damage structures from afar, and are the most suitable to build armor penetration on, since they can utilize their range as a safety barrier, because armor penetration items provide no survivability stats.

Agreed.

  1. Marksmen should have the most DPS when not interrupted.

  • This means Marksmen should itemize effectively with Attack Speed items.
  • This also means Marksmen should not be able to deal large amounts of damage when interrupted.

Agreed. I'll add on, they must scale with crit as well. A bit more of that in an old post of mine.

  1. Marksmen should be vulnerable to crowd-control, and burst.

  • This means Marksmen should not have insane sustain. Life Steal is not an ability Marksmen should have, it should be an ability Juggernauts and Fighters have.

Here I'm going to have to disagree.

Squishy carries who aren't marksmen rely on cooldowns (with a few exceptions, like cass and ryze). This means they can walk up, drop a full rotation, and walk back while they wait for their abilities to come up. It also means, if they're about to get blown up in a fight, they can spam all their buttons and at least contribute something.

By contrast, marksmen have to constantly stay within AA range of their targets in order to maximize their damage. With very few exceptions, this also puts them within range to be hit by their target. A marksman who's at half hp when the fight starts is going to get sneezed on and die without contributing anything (again, with a few exceptions, like Ashe or Sivir). Going into fights, marksmen need to be healthy enough to use their DPS. Lifesteal allows this to happen, by healing off of creep waves or jungle camps. It's not the only way -- for example, I could imagine an item like warmogs, but it has no health threshold, and it won't heal you past [220 + 60/lvl] HP (ie, 280-1300 based on level).

The same thing applies to during a fight. If an enemy mage or assassin drops a combo on a marksman as the fight begins, bringing them low, the marksman now has to back out of the fight entirely, or get blown up as soon as they try to do anything. Lifesteal allows a marksman to be useful if the attempt to burst them is unsuccessful. Again, it's not the only way, but in this case I can't think of anything quite as effective.

Let's imagine a world where lifesteal doesn't exist. Because of the above two scenarios, marksman can't afford to stay in AA range for extended periods of time. Therefore, they have to be effective in shorter periods of time -- ie, they need the ability to burst. We've already established that's not how things should be, therefore, we need lifesteal.

One clarification: I absolutely agree that marksmen should not have access to significant quantities of lifesteal in lane. Draven getting first item DD and instantly healing to full after you chunk him is beyond frustrating, and completely invalidates many poke supports.

the rest

Was going to respond to this too, but I have to head out now, so I'll end here.

Sire Hippington1 votes

I agree that marksmen need to have that sustain so they can contribute to fights somewhat reliably. However, their upfront damage right now is just to high, same with their protection against burst(For which supports and their item are just as responceible). If Marksmen can get back up after eating poke or surviveing burst rather easily, then actually takeing them down in one go should be an actually realistic option, or leaving them alive should not be as punishing for you.

The other big issue that i have with that is that riot seems to have double standarts in that regard. ADC get that sustain and more, but (magic/ap)on-hit itemisation has no sustain despite all the same reason for it applying as it's also about onsistent AAs. And even more so, all the reason for adc to have meanigfull sustain apply to a much larger decree to melees, especially the dps focused ones. Yet melees across the board have shit sustain comapred to adc with very few exeptions. If we look at HotS for example. Ranged champs have very little sustain, if any at all, while melees generally have rather high sustain. However, the most sustain is provided by Supports, they make sure that wounded heroe's don't have to stay away from battle for long, and there are also other healing mechanics like wells or healthglobes. The big difference to LoL is that supports not only keep the adc healthy, but everyone. Same for the other sustain mechanics, while on their own, ranged squishys have the hardest time sustaining as they lack it in their kit, and getting healthglobes on your own puts you into a dangerous spot as squishy with low health. In Lol however, ADC are totally indipendent in their sustain while also beeing waaay above everyone else in their sustain. Ohh, and the reason why i use HotS(asides from me knowing that game well) is that adc are viable, but not mandatory in HotS, while LOL has always had the issue with adc beeing mandatory and wrapping the meta around them.

Hyrum Graff2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Sire Hippington,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Pq1MAjNi,comment-id=00090001,timestamp=2017-07-18T23:59:44.306+0000)

I agree that marksmen need to have that sustain so they can contribute to fights somewhat reliably. However, their upfront damage right now is just to high, same with their protection against burst(For which supports and their item are just as responceible). If Marksmen can get back up after eating poke or surviveing burst rather easily, then actually takeing them down in one go should be an actually realistic option, or leaving them alive should not be as punishing for you.

I agree that the up front damage is too high. I think ramping damage (which in turn means ramping lifesteal) is a great direction to take adcs, for a couple reasons:

  • If tanks can CC an adc long enough for their ramping damage to fall off (or to prevent them from building it up), they have a different way to contribute to the fight than raw damage absorbtion and setting up kills.
  • If Assassins have a way of getting out of an adc's range after/during an attempted assassination (whether or not they are successful), this reinforces them as a counter to the adc role in a way that's not strictly burst.
    • Comparatively, this makes assassins worse vs mages and makes divers better vs mages and worse vs adcs. That's a pretty nice dichotomy.

The other big issue that i have with that is that riot seems to have double standarts in that regard. ADC get that sustain and more, but (magic/ap)on-hit itemisation has no sustain despite all the same reason for it applying as it's also about onsistent AAs.

On-hit AP build have never been well-supported by the item system. That's a big, complicated topic that I'm not going to attempt a full analysis of right now. tl;dr the item system currently makes some fundamental assumptions about how AP vs AP champions function (particularly, their scaling). Champs that break that mold have always proved problematic to balance (Cass, Azir, Ryze, Diana, Morde, Swain, Vlad...).

And even more so, all the reason for adc to have meanigfull sustain apply to a much larger decree to melees, especially the dps focused ones. Yet melees across the board have shit sustain comapred to adc with very few exeptions.

What class of champs are you talking about, here? Yi/Trynd/Yas/Fiora (skirmishers/slayers)? Jax/Irelia/Vi/Kled/Xin/Camille (divers)?

If we look at HotS for example. Ranged champs have very little sustain, if any at all, while melees generally have rather high sustain. However, the most sustain is provided by Supports, they make shure that wounded heroe's don't have to stay away from battle for long, and there are also other healing mechanics like wells or healthglobes. The big difference to LoL is that supports, no only keep the adc healthy, but everyone, same for the other sustain mechanics, while on their own, ranged squishys have the hardest time sustaining as they lack it in their kit, and getting healthglobes on your own puts you into a dangerous spot as squishy with low health. In Lol however, ADC are totally indipendent in theri sustain while also beeing waaay above everyone else in their sustain. Ohh, and the reason why i use HotS(asides from me knowing that game well) is that adc are viable, but not mandatory in HotS, while LOL has always had the issue with adc beeing mandatory and wrapping the meta around them.

Teridax683 votes

[{quoted}](name=Hyrum Graff,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Pq1MAjNi,comment-id=0009,timestamp=2017-07-18T20:02:20.776+0000)

Let's imagine a world where lifesteal doesn't exist. Because of the above two scenarios, marksman can't afford to stay in AA range for extended periods of time. Therefore, they have to be effective in shorter periods of time -- ie, they need the ability to burst. We've already established that's not how things should be, therefore, we need lifesteal.

I think this is only true in League because damage overall is too high -- if it weren't for life steal, marksmen would blow up when exposed to any source of damage, including from some tanks. However, whenever marksmen do get life steal, they get to survive more encounters that they shouldn't, which means other champions need more damage to be able to take them out then, which increases their need for sustain, and so on until we reach a state like the one we're in currently, where marksmen can heal for hundreds of health per attack, and where DPS often overflows into burst.

It's also worth noting that several other MOBAs offer proof of marksmen being able to work without life steal. HotS, for example, has quite a few marksman-like characters such as Sgt. Hammer, Sylvanas, Valla, etc. who either have optional healing, or none at all, and who are all capable of surviving because damage is paced slowly enough that they can contribute reliably with the health pools that they have. If you want marksmen to have sustain options, yet still be vulnerable to certain damage classes, that will inevitably lead to those classes receiving more damage, so balancing one purely against the other is always at risk of spiralling out of control.

AirKingNeo4 votes

This leaves Marksmen to deal DPS, equally to all targets, % bonus armor reduction that increases over time, if left unchecked would mean they can deal the same damage to tanks and to non-tanks alike, they should also have high-attack speed, and medium mobility and damage. However they have no critical chance, which means they also can't one-shot squishies, and they don't have flat armor reduction.

Then who kills assassins and mages if ADCs can't hurt them, but only tanks? Even I asked myself this when I tried to rework crit.

Also the rest of your ideas are terrible, but here's the core right here to show you why you're flawed.

Recons2 votes

Thank you for your criticism, I think no-one should be able to 1-shot tanks, that's kind of their role you know? Fighters and Mages can easily deal with Assassins.

Could you expand on why they are terrible?

AirKingNeo3 votes

Actually, wrong. Mages are trying to zone the enemy team and their backline. They're the ranged version of assassins. Fighters are trying to either break the frontline or diver the backline.

No one would really be killing Mages and Assassins, except potentially mages vs mages.

Recons2 votes

Supports are providing insane peel these days, with Locket, and Face of the Mountain.

EDIT: I also think tanks provide enough CC to lock assassins and supports provide even more and heals to boot.

AirKingNeo3 votes

What? How does that stop mages and assassins getting multiples combos and thus making ADCs die because they can't kill them?

Recons2 votes

Marksmen need to position intelligently, ranged burst mages don't have gap closers, and both assassins and burst mages are very squishy, Marksmen would still be able to kite and kill these threats when neutered by CC or when they make mistakes.

What do you mean when you say mages and assassins get multiple combos?

TwitchInMyPants4 votes

Lifesteal has been in the game since S1 and Juggernauts + Fighters with innate sustain can build lifesteal to get extra sustain and more benefit, especially when combined with visage. Marksmen and supports are balanced around them having lifesteal as a defensive option and are countered by grevious wounds and they just added another option for it, if you want to get rid of defensive options start with shit Riot added like GA or Scimitar. Also if melees having their items gutted is a problem, suggest more splits in the items. They just made a difference in duskblade, maybe ask for more lifesteal for melees on BT and BoRK instead of begging for it to be deleted from Marksmen.

And when you suggest they should build full damage but not be able to one shot anyone, you're basically saying "Delete crit" and even if that happened it'd likely just transition into things like lethality being the main damage which still results in burst which means, yes, marksmen will one shot you if they're ahead and you're out of position.

Also your idea that "All marksmen build attack speed" is also flawed at the start. What is Draven? What is Jhin? What is Graves? Hell there's even situations like Sivir/Quinn where they have the option to go more pen oriented or crit/AS.

I'm a flex player who started as a jungle main and even if bot is my favorite role right now I understand items get unfairly changed due to another role using them, but you're here begging for an entire class to be gutted without even thinking about what Riot has made here. Would you not read something like this about how OP tanks are and think how they've had hard seasons and that there's legitimate reasons for their items to be buffed? Wouldn't you want a middleman solution instead of "This type of item shouldn't even be allowed on the class ever". Honestly I want to see more classes in botlane but all you seem to care about is nerfing Marksmen instead of finding ways to create fighters/mages/assassins in botlane.

It Hertz When IP4 votes

{quoted}

b) No critical chance, at ALL this stat should be Assassin only.

I disagree. Assassin's damage should be coming mainly from abilities, maybe with empowered AA's woven in. That way, they have clear windows of power, and windows of weakness. Encouraging crit builds gives a lot of power to their AAs, which starts erasing those peaks and valleys in favor of sustained damage, at which point you basically have a mobile fighter building glass cannon.

Kariu Rena3 votes

Why should merc be bad on adc? From that logic we should remove the ap cdr from zhonya and banshee then rofl

KuroCaliber2 votes

See, I love this idea, and I'm willing to expands on it with my own thoughts.

1). I saw this on another post once, about how CRIT was too bursty and sometimes unreliable. I agree that CRIT inherently seems to be a burst stat, allowing one to chunk the heavy health tanks. But also ends up popping squishy champs FASTER than they pop tanks. As the whole Rock paper scissors thing goes, ADC are intended to trade weak early games for the ability to kill literally everything late game.

A week early game is frustrating to play through though, which is why we see marksmen abusing lethality when it is strong. The post in question decided to replace CRIT for marksmen with a stat called ramp-up. It basically worked like guinsoos and increased damage dealt via percentage over Time. Similar to how the battle trance mastery works. It's odd because guinsoos did be very powerful, but it is limited without a full build, while CRIT begins doing work when you hit two items.

If ramp up were implemented, ADC would do increasing DPS when attacking the same target, increasing the emphasis on single target damage. You can either ramp up against tanks to kill them, or you can ramp up against squishies, and kill them over time too. This actually makes death's dance a balanced item as the ADC would be able to delay the assassin burst long enough to play on equal ground with the assassin because they're ramping up. It would take the ADC time to still kill the assassin, instead of two shotting them when they fail to kill with their initial combo. It would also make heals and shield less oppressive because ADCs would use them to buy time for them to ramp up.

Your ie passive would change to convert the full ramp up time from like 8 second to 5-6s. Or else raise the% increase in basic attack damage.

If you are a burst carry like jhin, then you use CRIT, which then would be relegated to a bonus damage scaling with spell damage, think of Athenes but instead of increasing healing, it increases your next basic attack damage by some amount. It's not dps so carries would not want it, but it would require a large amount of spell damage to charge up, which only assassins can provide.

Tldr: ramp-up instead of CRIT on marksmen, would accentuate their strengths as damage over time, CRIT on assassins to help with their burst.

Recons3 votes

Ramp up seems just like what I'm saying, except I would like the % bonus armor reduction

KuroCaliber2 votes

I'd be ok with that, except Tanks usually have high base armor, and bonus open can't cut through that.

Joxcab4 votes

They only have around 20 or so more base armor at level 18 than an ADC.

AmetDeCrypt2 votes

I'd be open to a replacement for crit though it may be too ingrained in gaming culture to really be rid of it.

KuroCaliber2 votes

It doesn't need to be removed, only put onto a different class, shaco, talon and rengar already use similar mechanics which go to prove how much more of an assassin stat CRIT is.

AmetDeCrypt2 votes

but what about adc that were designed to be burstier? would draven or jhin or the random flying MF q feel the same "OH SHIT" levels of damage if it were a slow ramp up instead? I mean jax is a great example of this working well but even with riot shoving the guinsoos build down people's throats they still go triforce for instant burst and to hell with his passive except for split pushing.

people want their damage, and they want it now. you'd have to compensate carries for slower ramping damage because not everyone Zed is just gonna sit there and let them deal it.

Sire Hippington3 votes

people want their damage, and they want it now.

The main reason for that is that most people right now do alot damage and they do it now, so if you need to ramp up, especially on a melee, you just don't live long enough to reap the benefits of your ramp. However, if the upfront damage, especially from range, was reduced, ramping up duering a fight becomes a way more realistic fantasy.

Also on the case off assasin become an issue: if adc no longer threaten to just delete them if they fail to insta kill them, one could actually balance assasin around not haveing 100-0 burst patterns, but more ~60-0 with hit and run patterns that rely on slipping in and out of fights aswell as more coutnerplay to their burst. But with the current high upfront damage from everyone, you can be sure as assasin that if you don't delete a target with your combo, you will die befor getting a second chance. The only exeption might be Zed and Ecco because they actually have a reliable way out after their combo even without getting a kill.

Scary Door2 votes
  1. Marksmen are not Assassin's they should not be able to one-shot any one, literally anyone.

Could we just stop perpetuating this statement. Until someone shows me video evidence of a marksman "one-shotting" someone I don't want to see this. I am just tired of this statement regurgitated endlessly and the mouth-breather community tirelessly repeating this as their argument against marksman.

If you're going to make a claim, you have to prove it, and with replays being a part of the client now that should be very easy to do and yet there has yet to be video evidence of a marksman 'one-shotting' anyone.

The real problem with the game is that most classes/champions have too much damage. Damage is just far too high across the board on all levels in the game and has been for a while now.

ProfDrDeath4 votes

Something else to consider with that:

If an ADC complains about getting oneshot, the rightful answer is: Buy some defense.

If an assassin complains about getting oneshot...

...the rightful answer should also be: Buy some defense.

NineTailedMystic2 votes

Giving Crit Chance AND Flat Pen to Assassins? Why in the world would you do that.

Zero Skill Tank2 votes

This means Marksmen should not have insane sustain. Life Steal is not an ability Marksmen should have

If marksmen didn't have lifesteal, assassins would need to be cut on mobility absurdly hard. Right now they can have pretty much free access to marksmen, because in case they get CC'd halfway through their kill atempt and leave the marksmen with say 50%, this attempt is a complete fail (because marksmen lifesteals right back in).

And Riot will never do this, since assassins are consistently among the most popular champions, particurarly in younger audiences. Nobody would want to play an assassin whos gapclosing potential is on par with marksmen range instead of tripling it - it would be balanced, with no lifesteal, but it wouldn't be as fun to play.

PrinceOfStorms2 votes

If marksmen didn't have lifesteal, assassins would need to be cut on mobility absurdly hard. Right now they can have pretty much free access to marksmen, because in case they get CC'd halfway through their kill atempt and leave the marksmen with say 50%, this attempt is a complete fail (because marksmen lifesteals right back in).

Why would assassins need to lose mobility if marksmen didn't have sustain? If an assassin goes in on a mage and leaves them at 50%, almost no mages actually have the kit to top themselves off. Why should marksmen get special treatment?

Zero Skill Tank2 votes

Mages are different, they have longer range and don't need to stay in fight for long. Mages who's play pattern is similar to marksmen usually will have sustain or survivability build into kit in some form (best example is Cassiopeia, she is the most similar to a marksmen and so her kit includes a mechanic that is almost completely equivalent to lifesteal).

Shablagoo2 votes

And Adc's have a class that literally protects them, it always seems like ppl forget this.

Edit: Why am I getting downvoted, supports literally heal,peel, and shield for adc's, mages need their own survivability because they dont have a personal bodyguard. Cass, vlad, swain are mages who have sustain, but their dmg is dps and they dont have a support priority protecting them all game. So it makes sense for them to have sustain, if adc's want too keep their sustain then lower it a bit or decrease the power of support items which balances out. A Cait shouldnt be getting at a 600 shield while also healing 300 hp every auto attack.

Zero Skill Tank1 votes

A support can and will stun Zed ulting Orianna or Lux as well.

PrinceOfStorms2 votes

And Adc's have a class that literally protects them

Since that's the case, we should strip all survivability (remove lifesteal, as well as armor and MR from any item that provides AD, Crit, or AS) from them, because unlike mages, ADCs have a class devoted to protecting them.

Shablagoo1 votes

So ur literally taking what I said completely out of context, i hope you know that. You really think lowering the shield value or lowering the lvl of sustain from adc's is equvialent to a character having no defensive stats at all. It is so funny how adc's dont see the level of survivability their class currently has if they have a competent support with them. Take Soraka for example Windspeakers blessing makes shields and heals 10% stronger along with a 5-22 armor and 2.5-11 armor buff for 3 seconds add item 3504 item 3222 item 3107 which stack additively which is 50% bonus healing .

Just her w alone( with a 2 second cd) heals 300 hp along with giving 22 armor and mr, her ult heals 525 hp both instantly. Add the lifesteal and and even the 12% dmg reduction from pd( but its not always built) along with GA and almost forgot summoner 7 you have an unkillable adc. Dont forget adc's are exactly love tapping you they are hitting big numbers. I went full tank rammus one game and i was getting hit with 900 dmg crits from jihn. I've had a soraka heal me with her ult from 25% health all the way to full health again and i had 2k health. Yet I still see adc's complain about how ridiculous duskblade is i've hit a 800 dmg crit with rengar and duskblade thats huge ik but soraka can heal that dmg with two buttons and a adc can heal back to full health with two crits.

I honestly think either support items need to no longer stack additively but multiplicatively for shields or heals, or adc cant have the lvl of lifesteal healing they have. Ppl complain about duskblade being strong such a joke man look at some support items and you will see something more ridiculous. item 3190 item 3109 item 3107 item 3504 item 3174 item 3401 item 3222 .

PrinceOfStorms1 votes

If shield and heal strength stacked multiplicatively it would result in higher numbers.

Shablagoo1 votes

Hahah thats worse then, then its better to just not let other shielding power stack with each other but only stack with windspeakers blessing it might be hard to code, but making healing power item stack is what makes shields and healing to much.

More from Gameplay

3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay764 comments
7,167
votes
3 Refunds per season, upvote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay156 comments
3,510
votes
UPVOTE FOR URF
Gameplay606 comments
2,440
votes
Yes plz.
Gameplay456 comments
1,721
votes
3 Refunds per season, up vote if you want 3 refunds per season.
Gameplay114 comments
1,716
votes
When is ANYONE at riot going to address the awful new player experience?
Gameplay634 comments
1,383
votes

More by Recons

Runeterra Tectonic Plates Concept - Based on Killaburn Map
Story, Art, & Sound11 comments
12
votes
[ARAM] Replacement options for health regeneration
Gameplay3 comments
7
votes
Champion: Kayle // Ability Change: Intervention
Gameplay4 comments
3
votes
Domination Tree - 3rd tier runes stat clarity
Gameplay0 comments
2
votes
Kayn In-depth-ish Discussion
Gameplay7 comments
2
votes
[Rework] Tryndamere, the Barbarian King
Gameplay2 comments
1
votes