Does Riot even consider Tryndamere a rework candidate anytime soon?

I know Riot is extremely busy in the preseason, but I don't understand why Riot isn't considering Tryndamere as a high-priority rework candidate. Yes, I have been destroyed by Tryndameres in the past, recently and much longer before, but I will try to lay objective reasons on why Tryndamere should be focused for a Gameplay Update, along with a rework that was done on those reasons. Note that I'm not saying that he is broken right now, I'm saying that his kit is overall very toxic for the game.

1. His kit is WAY TOO one-dimensional (why WW and Poppy were reworked) According to /dev: ON Evolving the Laning fighter in the Nexus post, one of the quotes on champions is that 'single strengths must be overemphasized to the point of being excessively binary for them to even function'. Then they give Tryndamere as an example, and how he provides nothing but damage and so he should be amazingly good at that and splitpushing. This is pretty much admitting that Tryndamere is one dimensional and is focused ENTIRELY on split-pushing, becoming a split push bot in the late game. This pretty much goes against the concept of of Riot wanting to remove one-dimensional champions.

2. He is not fair/frustrating/unfun to play against (why Yorick was reworked) Most champions either have certain points in the game where they are weak, or a certain way to outplay them. An instance of the former is Nasus - he is one of the best duellists in the late game, but he can be bullied quite easily in the early game. For the latter we have Fiora - while Fiora is extremely good at 1v1s, she can be soloed by avoiding vital damage and carefully considering her riposte time - this way, certain other champions can 1v1 her in the late game by hugging the wall. Tryndamere offers none of these things - he is very strong in the early game because of his random crits, and the best you can do is to pray that he doesn't get lucky crits. In the mid/late game, you can't really do anything if he has superior or equal stats (he becomes a stat stick that you must outnumber and outlast for 5 seconds to beat)

3. He is way too feast or famine (why Kogmaw's rework was reverted) The justification of Swain's upcoming rework was that he doesn't really make an impact when behind, but becomes way too tanky while dealing too much damage when ahead. Well, you can replace the name with Tryndamere and there you go! Tryndamere can't do much if he falls behind except hope to farm and splitpush, while he destroys champions with his extreme damage while also becoming unkillable when ahead (his ult).

4. He has no counterplay (justification for the assassin update) Riot also say about Swain that he has a lot of power pushed into abilities that enemies really can't do anything about. This fits Tryndamere even more than it fits Swain - at least you can walk out of Beatrice's range and dodge Nevermove. A lot of Tryndamere's power is placed in critical strikes, his innate sustain and his ultimate. What is there for the enemy to do against that? Sure, you could argue items and runes, but true, healthy counterplay is something you can do in GAMEPLAY to avoid that (ex. dodgeable skillshots, delays etc.)

I really think Riot is biased for this champion and are actively trying to avoid reworking him for whatever reason. But Tryndamere fits the criterions needed for a rework VERY well, and I really think they should reconsider their judgment.

tl;dr Tryndamere fits too many checks in the rework criterion to be ignored for this long. He is the literal definition of one-dimensional, he isn't fair to play against, he is too feast or famine, and he has no counterplay. I really think Riot is biased against this champion for whatever reason and I think they should reconsider.