The person fed the most is usually the person that votes NO in surrendering, is it a general trend?

URBirdman·8/2/2016, 3:19:56 AM·2 votes·693 views

The person(people) fed the most votes NO in surrendering, when most people in the team just want to end the game as early as possible and stop playing with the feeder(s). I have seen this so many times and sometimes the feeder(s) successfully changed the voting and forced other people in the team to suffer more with the feeder(s). Is this a general case in LOL? Anyone know why these feeders do that? Should Riot figure out a way to stop this?

6 Comments

Mysticman898/2/2016, 3:31:15 AM3 votes

At first I interpreted this as the most fed person on the team tends to vote no, as opposed to the person who did the most feeding tends to vote no.

I would actually guess it's the fed people who do vote no most often, since they're the ones who feel like they might be able to carry if the feeders would just stop doing stupid things. The feeder sort is usually the ones initiating the vote in the first place, since they feel the game is hopeless as soon as their lane opponent gets to the point where they can dive them, neglecting the possibility of getting carried.

I feel like people overuse the surrender vote a lot too, since really up until rather high elo most games are readily thrown since people don't really know how to end effectively. (If a surrender vote fails, and enough time passes that you can propose another surrender vote without the game having ended in that time, then that pretty much implies the first vote was premature and/or the enemy team is prone to throws.)

Mokkun8/2/2016, 3:28:37 AM2 votes

Ya... I have a tendency to vote no when someone is raging and spamming ff. Especially if they demanded their role in champ select and then failed miserably.

Otherwise I vote no if I think the game is still salvageable, or about to be over in 2minutes or less.

CerealBoxOfDoom8/2/2016, 3:23:25 AM1 votes

It is a trend but only when the rest of the team acts like whiney little bitches about them feeding to the point its not even about the game anymore

Iageri8/2/2016, 3:25:22 AM1 votes

Sometimes I vote no as one of the feeders just to piss someone off because they're raging at the whole team.

"Oh! you treat us like that, I will torture you a bit. make you rage more and probably report you after. How about that buddy... "

I'm evil. but funny in that way. :3

Like I said I only do it occasionally under certain circumstances.

Talinis8/2/2016, 3:27:12 AM1 votes

It's also a general trend that the people who feed will be the ones who want to surrender. Oh, i'm 0/6, gg, surrender, WHY YOU NO SURRENDER. Meanwhile, I'm 8/2 trying to carry us. I usually vote no on a surrender vote because A, if you are the feeder trying to surrender, you just wasted my time by feeding so why should I respect your time by surrendering; B, if i'm doing well enough it's possible I could stall the game out for other laners to catch up or feed them some of my kills. And yes, there have been games where i've been able to use me in a fed state to stall the game enough for behind lanes to farm and catch up.