Champion Mastery Progression
Hello,
I was wondering what the mindset behind how champion mastery works was. From the name of the system and the intention, you would think that you progress through the champion mastery levels based on how well you do in each game, with bonuses based on whether or not you won. Instead, progression is based ENTIRELY on whether you win or lose. For example, I don't know if I've ever gotten a D and won, but I would assume that you would probably get a minimum of maybe 800 EXP. If you lose with an S+, you probably get a maximum of only 80 EXP.
What this ends up meaning is that no matter how well you do, when you lose, you make no progress whatsoever. For a win, sure, there's some variance in how much EXP you get based on your performance. But it basically is just saying that if you win, you level up, and if you lose, it doesn't matter at all, regardless of your score.
I'm not saying that individual performance has nothing to do with your win or loss, and that's why wins and losses should impact your score. But I think we can all agree that it isn't you alone that determines whether you win or lose. So when I see winning give literally 20 times as much exp as losing, it makes me feel like my individual performance hardly matters. And this is champion mastery, the one system in the game that is entirely geared towards individual players.
I was just wondering what the thought process was behind this, because this has made the leveling up process really tedious, not in an "I need to do better" way but "I need to get lucky with teammates" way. I've gotten 4 champions to level 5 and I'm currently doing my fifth one, and after encountering this apparent contradiction so many times I have finally reached the point where I want to post on boards.