"Meta?"/"Bronze=bad"
So I look at the boards almost everyday of the week for new and interesting things. From new skins, to game-play issues, and yes, even the memes. Though some recent threads and comments (I mean no disrespect to anyone) have grabbed my attention.
I've seen quite a lot of talk about what champions should be played or shouldn't and comments such as "silly bronzies" and what-not. I thought about these things and I don't understand why there has to be a certain "order" or meta to the game. I play League and while season 5 I was Silver I am currently Bronze 1 on my way back to silver, and all around me I hear comments that bronze are the worst and bronze suck and etc etc. Yet i see people say "This community is so toxic", but turn around and say people suck. Why not encourage these bronze players to be better, teach them how to be better, and see them grow into something more then a "bronze player".
Now onto this "Meta" topic. I play League of Legends and I know that there should be certain champions played in certain areas. Though I don't see why this has to be a thing honestly. I always thought League could be that game where you could pick up any champion you want and have fun playing it where you want. I remember playing Ashe jungle one time, and even though it didn't go well, me and my friends though it was funny and we had a great time with it. Though today I threads talking about how "Master Yi support is a Bronze 5 support". Though why pick on someone if they just want to enjoy the game and come up with creative ideas? I will never understand it.
I don't expect these issues to dissolve because of one post, yet I just felt like I should put my thoughts out there. (Sorry if my mind wondered throughout this post, I'm not too good at writing)
Edit: I should have put in here that I was trying to talk about "off-meta" picks in the ranked system, the two topics about Bronze players being bullied and "meta" were meant to be separate. Sorry if this caused any confusion.