Skip to content

I do not understand why some people never surrender

an actual dog··22 votes·4,774 views

It doesn't matter how far behind we are, I almost never see a surrender vote pass in ranked. When the enemy team is 20 kills and 5 towers ahead of you, just accept the loss and move on. Dragging out a game you only have a small chance of winning is just not efficient use of your time, when instead you could be starting fresh with a new game. Not to mention staying longer in a losing game will just tilt you more.

41 Comments

Noxian Pride9 votes

Just to play the devil's advocate here.

Playing from a losing position, even with perfect awareness your chance of victory is next-to-none at best, can be a learning experience. I know players whom, in such situations, stop playing to win and start playing to learn.

"Oh hey enemy team has a syndra, let's see how consistently I can dodge her Q"

"Oh hey they're 50 kills ahead and at baron. I'm gonna go try to steal it."

"This stupid Yasuo isn't following up on my Malphite ults, but this is as good a chance as any to see if I can't find opportunities to hit all five of them."

"Well we're screwed, but they're playing for kills at this point. I wonder how hard it would be to avoid them if I got their attention by splitpushing hard."

A few among countless possibilities. And if absolutely nothing else, they may just be hoping someone on the enemy team has to afk so they can potentially turn it around 4v5

Anìvìa2 votes

This guy knows whats up. There is no use in a surrender. This goes for normals and rankeds. When you are behind it is the best moment to see how you can turn around a game and learn to be a better player. If a victory is out of sight, play for improvement against those enemies.

It also gives the chance of winning the game. ( I won a game we went 0/20 midgame on once and I won a 3 vs 5 as well )

PentakillDragonK1 votes

You are exactly right. I never surrender I believe there is always a chance of winning. We should play sometime. I hate when my teammates surrender when we area few heads behind.

TyrekGoldenspear2 votes

This so much.

Every time I'm in a losing game I practice something, from CSing to splitpushing to deep warding, to trading with the fed lane partner.

WrstPlyrNAPlzRpt6 votes

I agree so much, but not everyone likes to play using their time efficiently. Some people will hold onto the hope as long as they can, and some people are just too stubborn to admit defeat until you stab them in the eyeball with it.
The biggest issue I have with this is, when people want to just admit defeat and surrender, and three people say no, unless they think they can carry the game they are pretty much assured to lose because you have two people who mentally are no longer committed to that game, at best, and at worst they either leave or troll til the inevitable loss. Once there is a surrender vote, your chances of winning drop significantly for each person who hits yea.

Anìvìa5 votes

There are different kinds of efficiency. One would be not surrendering and thus winning more games (You can win a lost cause more than people would care to admit) on average. Others prefer to have games that are always in their favor, and in case they are not, they stop playing alltogether. Those players loose more games on avergae. I do not see how that would be more efficient in a positive way.

I realy dislike it whenever I see a surrendervote. Especialy when there is only one lane who lost while every other lane did okay or won their match up. I saw players give up when first blood happened. You can't tell me that this is a healthy behavior. It also happened that surrendervotes happened after one lost teamfight while prior to this every fight was in our favor.

It realy got worse with the seasons that players surrender more quickly for no reason. If you vote yes you already lost that game. As long as you play you have the possibility to win, still. (Unless the vote happens after the ace and they already chunk your Nexus of course)

With the experience I have and the thousands of games I have completed I know that most games who got surrendered could have been won if the players would not loose their fighting spirit as quick as they do nowadays after one bad fight.

WrstPlyrNAPlzRpt3 votes

I will say that giving up too early is certainly something one should not do (although it can be an understandable response when you lose your lane so thoroughly you can't even do anything. It's disheartening after all and a lot of times your team will flame you for it, but that's a different problem) I am only really talking about games where your team is really far behind, you've lost like three teamfights with no kills and they have all your towers and inhibs and any struggling you do is just delaying the inevitable. Yes, there is always the cahnce they get cocky, do something dumb as shit, and throw the game because of it, but that's like 1 in a thousand chance, and personally I don't feel that chance is worth the extra 20+ minutes that might go into still losing just for the smidge chance of winning. Of course, people like me WILL tend to lose more games, but we will also PLAY more games because we save that extra bit of time after all.

IPinPC5 votes

Absolutely dislike 20 min rule. And it's even worse when some loser who is feeding whole time refuses to surrender and forces other 3 players to pretend playing. They really should review these repulsive rules of the game. If people wants to play - let them play but why artificially force them to play when majority don't want it ?

Malix Farwin5 votes

What bothers me more is normals, ive had games that were literally 4v5 with the enemy more then double the Kills and still no FF in normal games.

BIackfox3 votes

Yeah I hate people like that. They need a option to report people for "wasting teams time" Since I stopped being toxic and don't want to be banned anymore I cannot afk like I usually would which would be a lot.... Sadly I miss those days. I just tell them stop living in fairy tale land.

IPinPC3 votes

You can hit creep every couple of minutes to avoid leavers buster, it's still considered as play then alt-tab or move on 2nd screen to do w/e you want until game is over.

Lune20151 votes

I agree. And vote + for you.

Nameless Voice3 votes

Have you ever played a game where you're insanely far ahead, yet the enemy manage to drag it out, then one person on your team makes a huge mistake and the enemy team end up winning?

Or one where you're insanely far ahead and one of your teammates disconnects for the rest of the game, and you lose because you're not quite far enough ahead to win 4v5?

These kind of scenarios are fairly common, especially in lower ELOs.

That's one major reason why people won't surrender. People throw so much that the game often isn't over even if it appears to be.

The other reason, as others have said, is that you should also be also playing to get better. You can still get better by playing a game where you are losing - in fact, you can learn about playing from behind, which you won't be able to do in a game where you are winning. One of the most common mistakes I've seen in low-medium ELO is people who don't know how to play properly when behind.

Requiemsfire3 votes

What about teams that simply refuse to use the remake feature?

TwoChikfilaSauce3 votes

[{quoted}](name=an actual dog,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Il8ZUOkT,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-11-26T22:21:10.876+0000)

It doesn't matter how far behind we are, I almost never see a surrender vote pass in ranked. When the enemy team is 20 kills and 5 towers ahead of you, just accept the loss and move on. Dragging out a game you only have a small chance of winning is just not efficient use of your time, when instead you could be starting fresh with a new game. Not to mention staying longer in a losing game will just tilt you more.

Because they are far better people than you.

YoureNotAMuffin2 votes

Keep playing for sake of other team -- its a ton of fun to be ahead, and I personally hate when the other team surrenders when I'm winning.

Just Blame Jenny2 votes

I'd say it's elo dependent. Down here in silver, throws are very, very common. Even when the enemy team is way ahead.

I'm generally hesitant to surrender because I know that my opponents are probably dumb enough to leave an opening for a win, provided my team is willing to take it.

PlanetWarwick3 votes

Not true, teams don't throw as hard as you think they can. And even if they do throw, your team needs to pick up on the mistake so you as 1 person won't make a difference

Anìvìa1 votes

They do, and it happens on every elo. Most surrender voters do not even know wheter their team is strong late or not. Getting back into a game is not hard with a little discipline. Most players already fail in this regard as they just keep fighting with a deficit and make it worse instead of stalling the game and trying to farm themself back into it.

bad arcade kitty2 votes

firstly it is hard to actually say when you can't win and when you can you all saw a multiple surrendering votes which didn't pass and then that game was won, people who started them might be tilted but usually they likely honestly believed the game was lost. so refusing to surrender at all or to a certain dire limit will improve your chance to win somehow

secondly, while it is not very fun, prolonging losing games might be efficient to grind ip because you will get more ip than for a surrender at 20, and starting a new draft/ranked game takes quite a while

thirdly, playing with a disadvantage improves your skills...

DaBaiXiong2 votes

I never surrender. Ever.

Odin hates a fuckin' coward.

zoliking2 votes

{quoted}

I never surrender. Ever.

Odin hates a fuckin' coward.

Yeah, staying in a lost game is not brave, it's stupid and malicious. I'm not sure how Odin feels about dullards, but surely he can't suffer villains.

DaBaiXiong1 votes

No game is lost until its lost.

Its cowardly, and more likely to be malicious, to think a game is lost and try to quit, instead of just adjusting, lane swapping, grouping, warding, or any other number of variables that give an advantage.

Also, you can't hurt my feelings, duder. Quitting anything game for any reason, since remakes were initiated, is selfish.

zoliking1 votes

{quoted}

No game is lost until its lost.

Its cowardly, and more likely to be malicious, to think a game is lost and try to quit, instead of just adjusting, lane swapping, grouping, warding, or any other number of variables that give an advantage.

Also, you can't hurt my feelings, duder. Quitting anything game for any reason, since remakes were initiated, is selfish.

Look, if you vote no on a ranked game, no matter how bad it is, it's probably the right call. That being said, in normals if you trap a bunch of people in a game they have no reasonable hope of winning and make them suffer through an extra up to twenty minutes of misery because your only way to compensate for certain anatomical issues you think you have is to beat your chest and yell "Me nevar quit, me be courage much!" at your monitor then you are a horrible person, harming others for nothing more than to reinforce an inaccurately positive self image of yourself.

The decent way to assess in any situation whether to give up is to look at your chances of winning and the consequences of winning versus losing. In a life or death situation not giving up is right call because life times any minuscule chance of winning is better than death. In a ranked game it's all about the lp, and a minuscule chance of winning times what you would earn minus a great chance of losing times what you would lose is better than the loss of lp from the loss of game plus the average of 0 lp from the time you could spend on the next game using whatever time you freed up. In normals what you get is fun and xp. Let's start with the xp, as that's math and that's simpler. If you give up you lose the xp for the time you freed up from this game, but get the xp for the same time from your next game. The difference is that the xp you gave up most likely comes with a losing modifier and the xp in your next game, at the point of surrendering the current one is half way between losing xp and winning xp. See the formula below:

XP for not surrendering: timeSaved * xp/unitTime * losingModifier * greatChance + timeSaved * xp/unitTime * winningModifier * tinyChance Whereas the XP for surrendering is the same except instead of getting a tiny and a great chance on the sides, you get 0.5 and 0.5. So that's a loss for you and each of your trapped teammates.

The fun is more abstract, and varies with people, but I think it's safe to say that most people enjoy a tight game where each side can still win, a lot of people enjoy being ahead a bit and stomping on others, plenty, including myself enjoy being somewhat behind fighting for a comeback, but not too many enjoy being stomped on, unable to do much of anything. You advocate forcing your team into that specific situation because you saw Galaxy Wuest once and failed to realize that the "Never give up, never surrender" catchphrase comes from fiction even within the context of the movie and it generally applies to life or death situations, not gaming.

A surrender decision in a game has nothing to do with courage or cowardice, there is no danger involved, which is a prerequisite for any person to show either of those characteristics. This is about logic and common decency. Be smarter.

DaBaiXiong1 votes

Disagree. Also, I have no idea what a Galaxy Wuest is. I don't surrender ever because I've played a ton of games where kids would be spamming forfeits and begging to quit, only to go on and win that game.

I invest my time to play a game. A loss because other players didn't get ahead and stomp their lanes and feel like they need to quit has nothing to do with me. I will never ever quit playing or trying to win a game. Regardless of whether or not it is ranked. Its a team game with people. Other people put their time in. Ideally they also enjoy the win because of good strategy and play. Sometimes its luck. A thing works when it shouldn't have. Catching an enemy team making a mistake. Whatever it is.

Just because it isn't ranked. Doesn't mean you shouldn't try to play well. And just because you lost your lane. Or you feed a guy or whatever. Doesn't mean that a game is lost. Its more difficult yes. But a game isn't lost until its lost. Tight games are the best games. Kids who want to quit because they lost their lane, they thing, in the first six minutes are not okay.

Also, don't condescend. You aren't in a position to do so.

theChibiTina1 votes

First, I'm impressed you found a 2 year old thread. Lol. Second, I don't like surrendering either. I won't agree to surrender if they're just being upset about not doing well in their lane during lane phase. However, if the enemy has taken our inhibitor and only 2 or 3 of us are fighting to defend and still win while the rest are doing nothing except trying to surrender. That's when I just give in because there's no hope of winning if half your team has given up and aren't even going to try.

DaBaiXiong2 votes

First time I've logged into boards in ages. Was just on the list.

I never give up. Ever. I also don't think that just because it isn't ranked means I have the excuse of playing terribly or trying out new builds I've never done before.

It isn't fair to my teammates.

We should all be trying to win games. And not fucking each other over for selfish reasons.

theChibiTina1 votes

I agree. Even if my lane is doing poorly (and I know I'm not the best), I still try my best and don't give up. Which is why it's so upsetting and disheartening when others do.

Ahristocats2 votes

unless i'm an immobile melee vs a high range champ, i never surrender because i enjoy the game

9 X2 votes

Some champions just need to hit level 16 or grab that last big item to become a terror and turn the game around. A change in team behavior can also work wonders.

Forfeiting is for losers as far as ranked is concerned.

TyrekGoldenspear2 votes

This, kinda.

If we have a lategame champ/comp you bet I wouldn't surrender. I would do my best to hold out until late game comes around then wipe the floor with them.

Escheton2 votes

Because you can close out the game with a single teamfight lategame. And by then lead means nothing. So the best teamfight comp not early game cheese wins.

Don't get cheesed. Don't surrender.

Done252 votes

I've had games where it seemed hopeless but the enemy got too greedy and we took baron for the win. I've had games that have us stomping the enemy until my team gets too greedy and then the reverse happens. These are reasons for why a game is never over until it's over.

But then you have those other games. The games where your top laner goes 3/12 by 20 min because they simply will not stop trying to fight someone who is a 1000+ gold over them. The games where your support D/Ced 5 min into the match and your ADC got destroyed beyond salvation in lane. These games are the "lost causes". The games where you're so far behind that the enemy team is holding a dance party in your ruined base for fun. If you hit "No" in these kinds of games, even if by some miracle you win, you're still making everyone else on your team lose by forcing them to endure a horrible one sided ass kicking for who knows how long.

Laxfan521 votes

I only surrender if we have an afk or they have gotten all our inhibs without us getting tier 2 towers

Fertsa1 votes

If there's a toxic person on my team i purposely don't surrender because passive-aggressiveness.

bad arcade kitty2 votes

{quoted}

If there's a toxic person on my team i purposely don't surrender because passive-aggressiveness.

that's an amusing form of self-punishment

i had a game with a guy like you not that far ago. he picked smite on blitz, stole my first red (i was kindred), then after we took dragon and i was without smite he stole another red, stole a few other creeps, refused to surrender not knowing that to actually annoy me he had to agree to surrender since it was perfectly winnable and i was the second one who refused to surrender to fail the vote 3v2. we won that game

grug1 votes

I know some streamers like Tobias fate never surrender because it takes so goddamn long to get a game at high ELo they'd rather just play it out and enjoy it.

FN Wheeler1 votes

Goonies Never Say Die!

Nami in Bush1 votes

Guess you've never had a comeback game? Hence your rank.

If I FF'd every time my team was behind, I'd be Bronze/Silver.

Bent Pixels1 votes

Although I do find this sometimes annoying, I think that whenever you are playing the game you are gaining experience, which implies that there is not really any time wasted when looking at it from a learning experience.

Along with that, when you surrender or just accept defeat then you just completely give up the chance for a comeback, which is a very real possibility as it has happened to me many times before, especially with a hard-scaling champion... and everyone finds a good comeback seriously fun, unless you are the enemy. That's just me though

MujinTengu1 votes

It depend on matchups, even when your team is behind, or far behind it is still soloQ....they will make mistakes, and sometimes those mistakes make comback chances for your team to grab.

More from Gameplay

More by an actual dog