Strats : Remove them if annoying, or keep them because it's a strat like any other ?
Hello all, I was going to post this on Gameplay+ at first but got too stressed out to actually do it, hoping to see some people answering it all around.
First of all, no I'm not a high elo player, actually I rarely play ranked games. I've been around for quite some time, but mostly following the game "from behind the curtains" (I don't play a lot, in fact my account isn't even level 30, but been interested in the game for some time and watched a lot of streamers / pro-players).
So here's my question :
Should a strat, being too annoying to some players, actually get deletted from the game by the balance team or whoever works on this ? if so, where's the limit ?
First of all, I want to start of with one that kinda made me angry. The "gold funneling strat" (
jungle, and
mid giving out his lane xp to the hypercarries, giving them a huge advantage) , entirely forbidden and removed from the game due to the jungle item changes. Yes, as much annoying as it might have been, there wasn't anything about "cheating" or "breaking" the game by doing this. Players were following the rules, it simply was an original way to play the game.
It really saddened me to see that it was the path taken by Riot, removing it because players didn't want to deal with it, rather than trying to adapt to it.
Recently, a bit related to it was the fact that "APC" were being playable botlane, and some were indeed strong early in the game. ADC players , being not really happy about getting shat on by some of those APC, started calling the marksmen class "garbage, unplayable, etc..." when in fact, they just got countered by a better pick. Result :
got released,
price got reduced, and those marksmen were able to have a higher impact early in the game, while still being monsters into late game and kinda "shooing" away those new APCs from that lane.
Now, we've got the inting
strat. Yes, I've seen people deal with it, yes it's extremely tilting, but does it break any rules ? Is the player cheating by focusing on objectives rather than fighting a player ? I don't see it any different as an average splitpusher :
the splitpush king requires you to either stick to your lane and deny his farm so he can't be a bully and splitpush while making your teammates coming there because it's either he takes down your towers or kill you.
Most complains I've read about on the boards are "you need your jungler to take him down without him destroying your tower", once again, wasn't this the solution against any splitpusher since the beginning of LoL ? So why is that a problem from now ? Why should this strat be forbidden too ?
All in all, my own opinion is that as long as something isn't against the rules of the game, or exploiting the game (
or
in ARAM stacking armor and mr with ghost poro), Riot should have no rights to completly remove a strat from the game. Meta is always changing, heck I recall in s1 (or beta ?) players playing
mid and calling her really strong, or the 6
"bruiser build". You don't want to deal with something, it doesn't give you any right to remove that thing rather than trying to counter it.
Yes, sounds like a bit of a rant here, but hope some people would reply to this, I'd really love to see you opinions on this matter (and sorry if my english might be clumsy here and there, it isn't my first language and it's getting late around here)