why do people look at playing against smurfs and better players as a negative influence on the game. If you're playing ranked im assuming the intention is to play in a semi competitive environment with the mentality to get better and climb. Why not answer questions about why player X is just straight up better and what you can do to reach that level or go above it instead of crying on the forums.
I don't believe in a system that LP can be re granted based on a flawed banning system and the comparison to cheaters in CS GO is unrelated. You cannot get wins removed for having bad players on your team in CS GO and a system that can reward the losing team is one destined the fail (and league is already starting to fail a system like this would just make things worse)
I don't like you proposal it just doesn't make sense. You're basically saying because you had someone on you team that has under performed they deserve to be banned and you shouldn't be held responsible in any way for the loss your selves. Also inting isn't as clear cut as you think. I take every game seriously and I know I've had games where I've fed like crazy in the first 10 minutes because the lane snowballed just because a player gets reported doesn't mean the report is justified. I've also played numerous games where my top laner is 60 CS behind with 5 deaths at 10 minutes usually its not inting or trolling he's just worse than the opponent this happens a lot with auto fill and new players
The number of times a player actually ints is really low. More often than not the feeding (not inting they are not the same thing) is because they all in at level 2 or 3 and die and the game snowballs. If you go to your Lolking you can see in your last 50 games when you die and in most people i look up especially in low elo they die the most in the first 5 minutes of the game.
Proving someone is trolling vs just bad is hard because a lot of times people just don't think about the why they make plays. They tunnel into whats in front of them without thinking about why its a good play or bad play this is reinforced by result based analysis meaning you decide if a play was good based on the outcome which is a bad way to think about the game because it promotes an insanity type of play style that doesn't promote growth in league especially in low elo you can do the same thing over and over again and get different results. Also off meta picks are not a reason to be banned the champion exists and players have a right to play the game in a way they see fit (obviously this is within reason depending on the actual actions builds and play style but again its hard to prove these kind of things and just because something isnt meta doesn't mean it's troll and doesn't mean a person should be banned and you don't deserve your LP back
As for AFKers there are typically 3 types of afkers.
- The ragers usually they are the biggest offenders of result based analysis. The players that you cannot reason with. These are the only ones that ever really get banned for afking or at least i would hope so however usually the result of these players is from a snowball effect of multiple things going wrong on the map and although they may be the leading cause of a loss there are probably things you could've done to improve the situation by better communicating with the team or if you played situations out in a smarter way.
- The DCer these games can't really be helped everyone has had them you're in a game all of a sudden you're sitting at 5x or 6x your normal ping for no reason you cannot find the cause of it as your previous game you were playing just fine. You try to reconnect to the game and get numerous errors and if you do reconnect 95% of the time its too late and the game is over.
- The game is 100% over afkers or the game hasn't started AFKers. The players that start the game afk really have become harmless because of the 3 minute remake but we all have had those games where people show up last second. It's frustrating because they are put so far behind but you really cannot do anything about it i bet no one ever actually gets banned for doing this because A it happens so rarely and B they return with the intent to win. The 100% game is over afkers are the same pretty much but in reverse they played the game until the last minute or 2 where its just clear the other team has won. These players are sometimes mistaken as the ragers but the biggest difference is when they decide to give up.
