4 Bans please Riot
The champion pool is just too large and there are too many strong champions for us not to have 4 bans...
10 Comments
4 bans would be better than 3 bans.
5 bans would be perfect for the new champ select tough, because it is unfair that the first (and second) has no ban.
But maybe we have to go step by step, so 4 bans.
I made a post about this a few days ago and no one said anything constructive. Hopefully your post will get noticed more than mine did. I completely agree that with 128 champs to pick from nowadays you should get 4 bans. I have been playing since 2010 and the number of bans has never changed while the number of champs increases every year. I got some lame excuse from another contributor that in the pros a person could be locked out of the game possibly by increasing the number of bans. The way I see it is if you can only play a few champs then you aren't so "pro" to begin with.
Or just remove bans all together and let everyone be OP.
8^)
honestly not a good idea, not going to give reasons why as they are blatantly obvious.... and you would just be losing 2 bans, we already have 6.
i agree i wouldnt mind the thought of 4 bans each team but the reason as to why not is honestly obvious. think about how many spaces there are and how many champs are free each week. in a rare case it would be possible to make a summoner have no champ to pick AT ALL! that's why theres only 3 bans per team
If this game would be perfect, there shouldn't be any bans.