In which instance does the automated system ever read feeding as actually feeding?

mRiOzQAmos·8/10/2019, 12:58:21 AM·4 votes·1,611 views

Bot lane going 1/7 each by 14 minutes in the game.
Junglers feeding 2/13 by the end of the match.
People having died thrice as much while clearly typing it in chat that they do so to cause the team to lose.
People having 10-20% winrate in my ranked games, and people who first time champs only to feed their asses off.
People with bought accounts feeding their asses off in their unranked alts in my ranged games.

I recall the last time there was a post made by a guy here who claimed he intentionally fed to a 0% winrate on an alternate account, it got deleted by the mods. I am yet to come across a single instance where the automated system ever recognizes intentional feeding for what it is.

24 Comments

cars3n8/10/2019, 1:00:50 AM5 votes

There’s a difference between feeding and inting. All those could just be people feeding unintentionally and the system needs proof it’s intentional, innocent until proven guilty.

DuskDaUmbreon8/10/2019, 1:06:10 AM5 votes

The automated system does not deal with inting.

And nobody gets punished for simply feeding. Only for inting.

Baby Ghoul8/10/2019, 1:23:58 AM3 votes

{quoted}

Bot lane going 1/7 each by 14 minutes in the game.

Junglers feeding 2/13 by the end of the match.

People having died thrice as much while clearly typing it in chat that they do so to cause the team to lose.

People having 10-20% winrate in my ranked games, and people who first time champs only to feed their asses off.

People with bought accounts feeding their asses off in their unranked alts in my ranged games.

I recall the last time there was a post made by a guy here who claimed he intentionally fed to a 0% winrate on an alternate account, it got deleted by the mods. I am yet to come across a single instance where the automated system ever recognizes intentional feeding for what it is.

What were their assists like? I don't know why you would leave out such important information. Having a pretty KDA at the end of your loss doesn't mean anything.

Uraraka8/10/2019, 8:27:30 AM3 votes

Unless a player feeds, has no cs and no damage it won't be taken as intentional feeding. If someone has cs and damage, even if they write in chat that they're going to feed, the system is not going to take that as int and if you file a ticket, the support team will reply that it isn't int but bad game for that player.

Even if you give chat screenshot, they'll say the same. There was a post on euw boards where an ADC player Inted and got 14 day ban few weeks back : they had no cs, no damage and fully fed. Like you said on Na boards one player Inted many games and got away with it because they had some cs and some damage.

ZephyrDrake8/10/2019, 2:01:43 AM2 votes

You know something that would help the system deal with inters faster? People actually reporting inters and not the dude who went 1/4/10 (example) in their games. There are so many people that do that sort of thing that then it makes it harder for the system to detect actual inters. Also assists are important and the type of champion is also important. If you are the only engage option in your team and nobody ever goes with you when you engage you will have a lot of deaths. If the enemy focuses you down from the start of the game then chances are you will have a ton of deaths. Someone dying a lot doesn't mean they are actually intentionally feeding.