Is it possible to talk experience across different ranks?
League of Legends has the most players of any online game, and as such the skill diversity across all the ranks is extremely far apart. What a silver experiences in game, a gold could experience something completely different.
I frequently have conversations with lower elos players and I would talk about how oppressive someone like akali is and how easy yasuo is in lane. They would have the opposite experience of yasuo taking over games and akali getting stomped in lane.
This large disparity is normal for a game that has such a large playerbase as this but then how are we supposed to actually talk about experiential evidence vs hard facts. How a champion is to play against is relatively subjective but is VERY important to think/talk about when discussing if a champion has a good design. So then at what rank should a champions experience be based at? The lowest of bronze-silver where a majority of the player base is or the highest tiers of Master and challenger where few people are but where the competition is most palpable?
(Note: None of this is to bash any elo, It is merely marking a difference in experience that people in those elos have.)