Grievous wounds is apparently more healthier when applied via autos than how Morello's does it.
Riot Axes was asked:
Q: Why does Executioner's Calling proc without any prerequisition like the one Morellonomicon has?
A: We think this model is correct for Executioner's Calling, particularly given the changes to Grievous Wounds (e.g. it no longer applies to healing from allies, so soraka's W isn't reduced). It's possible that we need to re-evaluate Morellonomicon, though I'm much less sure about that one.
mind telling me why you believe applying gw on auto attacks is more balanced than applying gw via morello's current passive? it's obvious to anyone who's played more than 100 games that you're not making any sense here.
), the majority rely on healing steroids that directly or indirectly increase when at a particularly low health level. This style of durability sets them apart as being specifically more difficult to DPS to death, while being more vulnerable to burst (If they're at 30% health and you can burst them to death in one go, they're dead. If you can only whittle away at their health, they'll sustain through it and kill you like they are supposed to do). Applying grievous wounds only to low health targets hard counters many of their core play patterns in an arbitrary and unfair way. Tell me, would you prefer to take 20% reduced healing at any health %, or take 40% but only below half HP? If you were a volibear, you'd know for sure that that 20% flat healing debuff is FAR healthier than 40% at below half, since the latter completely cripples his passive. That same train of thought goes for Aatrox's W heal, Mundo's ultimate, Zac's passive, or Olaf's whole dang kit.
