So at both Q and W max rank, it restores enough energy for 1 base Q, not even empowered Q unless she's already in empower range when she used her first Q....
Do you guys even math?
Assuming Akali level 9, Q costs 80, passive restores 20, W 40, she's at max energy: Q (-80), proc passive (+20), Q again (-80), proc passive again (+20) which leaves her at current 80 energy, E (-30), P (+20), current total, 70, wait 1 sec (+10), Q (-80), P (+20) current total 20, W (+40), wait 2 sec, Q (-80), P (+20), adding in the total action time around 6-8 sec, she has energy for 1 more Q, and if she procs passive again, will still need to wait 4-5 sec to do another Q, no E as it's on cooldown. That's quite a healthy patter and duration, considering at level 9, Zed, Talon, Fizz, LeBlanc, Ekko, Zoe, Lux, Veigar (you get the point) can almost 1 shot in waaaaay less the time without needing to hit every single spell, just 1)
That's assuming she hits every Q, passive pro and her E. She can throw W earlier than I stated, maybe even after the first Q and P to get another empowered Q, but then that leaves her without a followup on chase, as if she uses W too early, one can run.
Now, I know I didn't calculate her ult, as that's a situation where her R isn't considered. Now, here's the question for you stubborn dudes, how much energy should each passive proc restore if you remove the W energy generation? At which which W level is the cost moved to P?
Come on, don't just throw statements, back them up with math, as if you move too much energy on her P, that timer goes waaaaay down, if don't put enough, she can't kill.