Korea is the best region. Faker is the best mid laner. Assassins suck in the meta. Taiwan is a joke. NA > EU.
We had a lot of preconceived notions heading into the 2015 Mid-Season Invitational. After Edward Gaming raised their championship medals at the Donald L. Tucker Civic Center, we're still left with many lingering questions to ponder over.
What were the biggest takeaways from MSI, and what do they mean going forward?
Faker is not the best mid laner any more
Sang-Hyeok "Faker" Lee played well at MSI, but for many, that's not good enough. The Korean mid laner has dominated for so long that he's been touted as a God for his achievements. But as we saw in Tallahassee, even Gods can bleed. Faker was outplayed at several points against Fnatic, and outsmarted in the deciding game against Edward Gaming. He fell directly into Heo "Pawn" Won-seok's trap after picking LeBlanc, and was punished mightily for it when EDG ran a composition to counter it. Given the events of MSI, and the LCK finals before it, Faker may not even be the best mid laner on his own team, much less the whole world.
On the other hand, Faker's substitute Lee "Easyhoon" Ji-hoon was mechanically dominant throughout the tournament, and many of those competing in the event admitted to being more worried about the newcomer's strengths than they were of Faker's. With Easyhoon's mage-based, farming playstyle being complemented by the current meta, Faker could certainly return to the top if he's able to adapt. But for the first time in years, we don't know who the best mid laner in the world is.
Taiwan is a legitimate region
Before MSI, many fans clamored for Taiwan to lose its auto invites to Worlds, as it was deemed more like a Wildcard region than one of the five major regions of competitive League. Though ahq e-Sports Club managed to tie Edward Gaming for 2nd Place in the Group Stage at 2014 Worlds in Taiwan, TPA's lackluster 1-5 record led to widespread skepticism about the quality of Taiwanese teams. It's fair to say that the new ahq e-Sports club has silenced doubters.
After coming in as one of the true underdogs of the tournament, ahq defeated Team SoloMid and Fnatic, and nearly defeated both EDG and SKTelecom T1 in the Group Stage behind great performances from all members of the roster. Ahq's performance shattered preconceptions about the team being just "Westdoor plus four." With yoe Flash Wolves' performance at IEM Katowice and ahq's performance at MSI, it seems that Taiwan has responded to its criticisms -- this region is here to stay.
Fnatic is world class
Fear Fnatic. This group of mostly new players burst through the gates at MSI and didn't stop swinging until they proved they're a force to be reckoned with. Living up to the aggressive playstyle they're known for, Fnatic advanced through the Group Stage on the back of their proactive play and Bora "YellOwStaR" Kim's leadership. But more importantly, they stood tall against SKTelecom T1 during the Semifinals, not backing down where other teams seemed to cower under the weight of Korea's prestige.
Going in to the 2015 EU LCS Summer Split, Fnatic is confident and focused on their goal of making it to Worlds. That should be a scary prospect for the other teams in the region, as they showed incredible teamwork and mental fortitude over their impressive run at MSI. The team was able to make people -- including their competition -- believe in them. Going into Summer with their former star AD carry Martin "Rekkles" Larsson, this squad is determined to breeze through their opponents off the tail wind from their MSI performance.
Tanks reign supreme
Sometimes, we're ruled by the times we play in. Despite some attempts to break the jungle meta, like Zhao-Hong "Mountain" Xue's Jarvan and Kai "Clearlove" Ming's Evelynn, MSI was dominated by four junglers: Rek'Sai, Sejuani, Nunu, and Gragas. These junglers made up over 95% of jungle picks, and at least one or multiple were picked or banned in every single game.
The dominance of Cinderhulk, and the meta that is created around it, left little room for fighters or assassins out of the jungle. In addition, junglers that could not control the pace of the early game were left to the wayside, reducing overall diversity. However, as Clearlove showed us, there is still hope for jungle innovation. It just might take some imagination.
Team SoloMid has issues
After rolling over most of their NA LCS competitors throughout the Spring Split, it was surprising to see TSM so enfeebled at MSI. Perhaps they wanted to surprise their competition with new tactics, or save strategies until the Semifinals, but the results didn't exactly pan out. TSM's champion selects were questionable, as were their lane swaps (or lack thereof, in most cases). Nearly every member of the team openly admitted to underperforming.
Does this mean TSM will have it rough going into the NA LCS Summer Split? Possibly, but not likely. Even though it was tough, MSI was a great learning experience for the confident team, and hopefully this fresh dose of reality will allow them to buckle down and focus even harder on their Worlds goals. To get there though they have to stop underestimating competition, play to their strengths, and work on improving their lack of communication.
IWC regions still have a ways to go
Beşiktaş e-Sports Club showed a lot of heart, but that didn't stop their competitors from punishing every mistake they made. The Turkish team may have had an impressive showing at IWCI, but against some of the best teams in the world, they were outmatched and picked apart. They displayed interesting tactics (like a fun four-man level two gank on SKT's Faker), but ultimately weren't on the same level of play as their competitors -- and they knew it.
Yet rather than hiding their heads under the sand, BJK came away from MSI revitalized, determined to play just like the greats they competed against. Now they'll return to the developing Turkish region with international experience, new strategies to try, and the drive to dominate over their up-and-coming competition. We'll have to wait and see if other IWCI teams can match BJK's new drive, or if these Black Eagles will stomp just as hard as they think they will.
Westdoor doesn't care about your meta
Many criticized Liu "Westdoor" Shu-Wei for his champion pool before MSI, stating that his best champions were not "in meta." As a result, he was overlooked as an elite mid laner at MSI by other players. Despite no other mid picking Fizz at MSI, Westdoor was dominant on the champion throughout the event.
His play was so impressive that he was able to solo kill many of his "superior" mid lane opponents throughout the tournament with relative ease. Whether Westdoor's play on off-meta champions is indicative of his greatness as a player, or if the meta isn't as stagnant as we would like to believe, is uncertain. However we do know that Westdoor will play his Fizz no matter what's on the line or what's en vogue.
Clearlove is an all time great
Clearlove's career legacy was secured after World Elite's dominance during 2012, including winning IPL5. However, in recent history, Clearlove has often been thought of as a liability for his team. In a twist of fate, Clearlove was a vital part of his team at MSI. Not only did he control the pace of the game for EDG, but he was awarded MVP of the entire tournament as a result of his stellar play.
After a career spanning three years and nearly two dozen regional and international tournament wins with Team WE and EDG, Clearlove is one of the most influential junglers in the history of League of Legends. Hopefully fans will eventually give him the same respect they give Yu "Misaya" Jingxi and Gao "WeiXiao" Xuecheng for World Elite's success. Someday, maybe he'll be given the credit that Pawn and Hyuk-kyu "Deft" Kim have received for EDG's accomplishments as well.
Korea isn't the best region anymore
While SKTelecom T1 rolled through the MSI Group Stage with an undefeated record, they did not make it to the Semifinals unscathed. After rough games against ahq and Fnatic in Groups, the Korean giants faltered even more in the Knockout Stage, narrowly escaping Fnatic 3-2 in the Semifinals. They ultimately fell to China's Edward Gaming in the Finals after utilizing both mid laners against Heo "PawN" Won-seok and company. With EDG stepping up, quickly adapting to SKT's strategies, and finding ingenious ways to pick them apart, the Korean region simply doesn't look as dominant nor threatening as it once did.
That said, SKT's roster structure is at least partially responsible for their results at MSI. Without all of their normal subs to turn to, the team certainly struggled. But when they do have their full roster, the team is by far the scariest in their region. Don't take SKT's loss at MSI too hard. This is a group of players who don't take losing lightly, and will fight back to prove themselves as the best once again on the Worlds stage.
These were just a few of the many things we learned after watching the phenomenal performances at the Mid-Season Invitational. Check out the video below to see a few more awesome moments and memories from the event.
Which moments stood out to you from the Mid-Season Invitational? And what did you learn from the event? Let us know in the comments, and for more photos from the event head over to Flickr.
To watch every game from the 2015 Mid-Season Invitational, check out our spoiler-free VODs page.
Frank Fields is a Senior Editor for Riot Games' Esports Web Content team. You'll find him flash charming people in Diamond... or on Twitter where he'd love to talk to you about esports.Leah Jackson is a web content editor at Lolesports. Her favorite champion is currently Gnar. Feel free to follow her on Twitter for esports banter and corgi pictures.
Its like the community is not salty enough, now riot gonna add sacks of salt on it lol. Didnt they already made a post about fnatic playing well and all that other stuff :P?
That is actually a complete lie. You can't compare Faker and Easyhoon because they don't play similarly at all. Faker is someone who likes to make early roams and make plays. Easyhoon on the other hand just likes to farm and then join in on team fights. They are two completely different styles of play. Whereas, yes. You can compare Febiven with Faker. However, when we compare the two, lets look at their games against each other. In group stages, Faker went against him as Lulu and went 4/4/11. Febiven went 8/3/8. Now, Immediately people will say, "Oh, Febiven beat Faker" however that is not the case. Faker outfarmed Febiven by the end of the game by about 40 CS. Also, He was a bigger impact in team fights. The reason he didn't get as many kills, was because he was playing a /support/ Mid laner. He would wait for them to try and jump on Bang, and then Ult him, and let Bang get most of the kills. Yes, In the semifinals Faker did do Semi Poorly. However, in the games they lost, Their pick ban phase was pretty lack luster and weak and it cost them quite a bit. And then people compare him to Pawn and say, "Oh, he did terrible against EDG, he is not good anymore." Well, When you look at what happened you can see why. Games 1-3 he wasn't put in. Game 4 he pulled out the Kassadin and completely destroyed the enemy team. Game 5, he was counter picked by basically every single member of the enemy team. He picked Leblanc, and he still went positive even though the enemy team had the following:
Sivir Spell Shield
Morgana Spell Shield
Maokai Point and click
Sivir QSS
Evelyn w/ Banshees
And Alistair who could Chain CC Faker as long as Maokai Landed his Point and click root, And then you just have everyone else channel onto him and burst him down in two seconds.
Also, he could never assassinate Morgana because she had Spell shield, and Ultimate. If Faker wanted to land any combos, he would have to wait till both abilities are down which is basically never.
So All in all, Faker is still the god of Midlane and people need to stop complaining and cut him a bit of slack.
Clearly you don't take into account that defining best means also to be adaptable. While mechanically Faker is definitely strong beyond belief, it is perfectly possible that he isn't the best due to lack of flexibility with picks.
And yet did Faker have a ban-worthy in-meta Azir? Yes. Cassiopeia. Absolutely. Sure, his no-longer-in-meta Ahri left something to be desired. And his Lulu didn't put up huge numbers. But he also had absolutely incredible games on Ezreal and Kassadin. Moreover, he was often camped and specifically targeted by his opponents and he still managed great numbers.
The 2nd highest KDA for any mid-laner in the tournament was Faker (5.6 vs. Pawn's 5.9). Faker was also the only player to rank ahead of ANY player from EDG. Faker also averaged nearly a minion more per minute than Pawn in CS.
Yes, there were a lot of questions floating around as to whether or not Faker could play meta-picks since he was always going off-meta during groups while Easyhoon was on-meta. But the series against Fnatic showed that he didn't struggle on the meta-champs -- he simply wasn't picking them. And the castors stopped commenting on his lack of options afterward. Apparently the writer of this article, and you, failed to notice, however.
Faker is still the best mid laner.. Yes he was baited into a Leblanc pick, but look at how well he was doing on it for the situation that he was given. Also I have to disagree with Korea being worse than China because if MSI let SKT T1 have more time to prepare and let them bring their substitute TOM it would've been a different story. In many ways T0M is better than Bengi, but he goes on tilt. If they had T0M , we would've seen the true SKT. The one that dominated LCK playoffs and 3-0ed GE Tigers.
Faker is still obviously the best mid laner, that's a given. But even with Tom SKT is likely to have lost, EDG was amazing in picks and bans. That was just fantastic coaching. But i also agree that 1 tournament isn't enough to draw conclusions, especially considering how close the finals were. When China wins worlds, then i'l acknoledge them as the best region.
As an unrelated note: Great name :D (Sunhwa is better doe <3)
Yeah man, he calls out faker for his leblanc when it took an entire top tier team comp to stop him. He was baited into the pick, not his fault, Komma should have seen it.
Uh the Mic check video shows Faker wanting LeBlanc and Kk0ma saying "yeah fk it, just pick LeBlanc, doesn't matter if we lose.. play your most comfortable champ."
No one "baited" Faker into LeBlanc. Go watch the Mic Check video EDG vs SKT. Everyone on SKT knew that EDG wanted Faker to pick LeBlanc. Kk0ma said "yeah fk it just take LeBlanc. Doesn't matter if we lose, just have a comfortable game."
"If MSI let SKT T1 have more time to prepare and let them bring their substitute TOM it would've been a different story." You do know that only LCK allow double sub between game. Rest of the world play the same rule that MSI was playing. If LPL has the same sub rule as LCK, you bet those Chinese team will implement the same strategy. They are the league with most talents and most money that can import players. MSI proves EDG is really a level above SKT. SKT has advantage with change play style with their sub between series on the fly. But EDG just need one games to adjust their play style later on crush SKT. SKT win a very close 1st game, but EDG adapt and figure them out, crush them on the 2nd and 3rd games. Those 2 games are not even close. They got stomp. 3rd game they sub Faker in, EDG need 1 game to adjust and lose badly on this one. 5th game, EDG crush SKT again. Its not even that close.
The day i see TSM play good in a international tournament i will agree they underperformed, what i see now is that they lack skills to beat other regions then the wildcard
I've been watching TSM for a long time now. I know they don't preform well in international tournaments, but their play coming into this was great. They had wonderful ward control, great lane swaps, and Lustboy really was strong in lane. I saw the team crumble in the tournament, not because of how bad they are. TSM just didn't play well, case and point. It isn't that they lack skill, they proved they have the skills in MSI when they ransacked the whole tournament. This is just a blemish on an otherwise great team. Their picks and bans can be blamed on Loco, he coaches them and he takes the blame for that, their lack luster team play and shot calling is all on them. I'm not being "salty" or anything here, I'm just stating facts. Take it as you will, but the team as a whole did not preform to expectations. I'm S3 and I could see blatant weaknesses and bad choices in team comps.
I've been watching TSM for a long time now. I know they don't preform well in international tournaments, but their play coming into this was great. They had wonderful ward control, great lane swaps, and Lustboy really was strong in lane. I saw the team crumble in the tournament, not because of how bad they are. TSM just didn't play well, case and point. It isn't that they lack skill, they proved they have the skills in MSI when they ransacked the whole tournament. This is just a blemish on an otherwise great team. Their picks and bans can be blamed on Loco, he coaches them and he takes the blame for that, their lack luster team play and shot calling is all on them. I'm not being "salty" or anything here, I'm just stating facts. Take it as you will, but the team as a whole did not preform to expectations. I'm S3 and I could see blatant weaknesses and bad choices in team comps.
TSM sure needs to step it up. Skill was not the issue here. It was much more poor choice play.
TSM just came play internationally, its been proven time and time again. The only reason that they win in their region is because they scrim them so much that they know how to beat the teams.
When they dont have proper information on a team or are outclassed then they dont perform. Look at S4 worlds, look at IEM San Jose, you could look at just about any international tournament that TSM has attended and see this as fact, the only reason that they won IEM Katowice is because they were facing teams clearly weaker than them.
Its not like they could choose who they went against GE were stupid and lost to WE cj was a bit under prepared and yoe flash wolves were fine I don't think you should be putting tsm down for winning Katowice just because they didn't play top teams
You forgot the EU > NA part... Think its the most important one... Just saying and the most Legit one as well ( aside from that TSM has problems and should be called FreeSM after MSI )
Or that half year salt crap from NA...Well dude we have all rights. "let's act cocky as far as some "analysts" consider us to be the better region in the west" Its pretty clear you are not. And now that " let's stick together and act like we actualy play on the same region" bullshit. Dont forget to say TSM was underperforming (How is that? Dominate NA ain't the same as dominate world. And 3:0 yoe Flash means only very little).
NA wins a tournament the whole community says and thinks NA > EU and its ok we take it cool when EU wins or does really well on a tournament and says EU > NA they get trashtalked, this says a lot about the community indeed
You guys did not take it cool after tsm won Katowice... What are you even talking about there was a lot of salt after Katowice just saying and now once eu did better in the tournament than na all eu does is try to run it na's face the community's of both regions are just as bad
EU has never been such d*cks as NA has been after Katowice. So i do not feel sorry for people in NA. I wish all the dumb trashtalking would stop though. In the end i'm happy if NA or EU does well. I just hate it when people disregard EU despite them proving to be the slightly better region since season 1.
well lets see
battle of atlantic they lost to NA
All-stars 2014 EU was last in both team events
IEM season 8 world in fact they did ok
Worlds they lost badly
Gambit won an IEM event in season 9(good job)
Lost badly at IEM season 9 world
Then MSI that they got to semi's(with a nice run)
Not the best track record a little better then I expected.
Battle of Atlantic EU won 3 out of 5 games...Riot just decided to make some games worth more points than others.
Worlds was the first team where anyone thought NA would be better than EU...any other events before it was never a question that EU is ahead of NA...Fnatic won S1 Worlds, Gambit was top 4 in S2 Worlds and widely considered the strongest team for all of season 2, Fnatic was top 4 at season 3 worlds, Gambit won multiple international tournaments, often beating Korean teams...during the first 3 season all NA had was one quarterfinal appearance at worlds where C9 lost to Fnatic. Season 4 worlds where EU played terrible and TSM and Cloud9 got to the quarterfinals was the first time NA was considered better than EU.
You all hate on them for saying Faker isn't the best anymore, while it may have something to do with the meta, he got solo killed twice by Febiven, out done by Pawn, and even his sub is better right now. It isn't that he is bad, its that he is bad in this meta, he thrives on early game dominant champs or assassins that can change a game, (Zed, Leblanc, etc.) but when it comes to playing the farm meta with champs like Azir, Vladmir, and Kog'maw, many mid laners are better at it. Pawn and Easyhoon come to mind. Faker can still adjust, but he either adjusts or we need to hope the meta shifts back to his strong suit. Down vote if you like, but just because something is changing, doesnt mean its a bad thing that isn't true, I actually like this because i hope Faker gets a new sense of urgency to practice and he comes back even stronger to make up for his performance at MSI.
A team's strength is not defined by their performance or domination but by the strength of their opponents. A diamond team would trash platinum team, a challenger team would trash that diamond team and that challenger team would get trashed at the Wild card tournament by BJK who gets trashed even by NA and EU.. etc.. etc..
Just like Cloud 9 looked amazing in NA. But ultimately it showed it doesn't matter if you literally win 90% in a region if that region isn't as strong as other. It's easy to look amazing versus worse opponents.
Taiwan has been a big toss up for a lot of the season. AHQ, Yoe, HKE, and TPA are all strong teams. If you had watched Taiwan you would know that. Also, there's more to identifying good teams than just win/loss. If you had watched Taiwan you would have seen that they are strong both mechanically and strategically and certainly on par with the international competition.
Common... TSM was considered world class for even less and nobody complained about it. Yes win IEM but against far worse teams. So now when they said it about Fnatic whats actualy wrong? Stop act like pregnant girls and be happy, that west can contest once more.
FNC finish the fourth at group stage(2-3), only win against TSM(5th), BJK(6th). OK, they have a good game against SKT but still lose to them. This is not a world championed SKT(no Piglet, Impact, Pooh). This is not the SKT that win 3-0 against GE (no Tom).
I Agree, FNC done well and have a good performance, but inconsistent. Is that enough to make them "World Class"?
inconsistent! It's the only argument NA guys using to justify trashtalk. "Yeah they had their moments, but they are inconsistent, so who gives a shit?" The best is... you can use this word to descibe every team in the world and it still would somehow sounds legit. TSM is inconsistent, no need to mantion why. SKT is inconsistent wrecking EDG and then losing to them. EDG is inconsistent, losing to SKT then crushing them in finals. SSW was inconsistent team, not winning the LCK then dominating Worlds. So guys, if you wanna only trashtalk just for fun, start with inconsistent. It would change that salt into analysis.
OK. don't mention at "inconsistent", only FNC performance. They have a good performance.
But Is that enough to make them "World Class"? finish at 4th in group stage and lose at semi final. if FNC can be "World Class" from that, There is so manyyyy "World Class" team.
AHQ finish at 3rd in group stage.They win against FNC and lose to a close game against SKT in group stage as same as FNC and lose at semi final. AHQ is "World Class" too, right?
Yes AHQ is a world class team. I would simply say, that logic behind "world class" should be something like this: If team is able to repeatedly win against best teams in the world, it should be amongst them. Simply if you force best teams in the world to see you as a real threat, you are world class team. And doesnt matter if you are able to win 3/10 games vs best team...maybe it would be it when you face them in Worlds. Ofc you can question that logic, couse there is no oficial statement showing which team is best, but luckily in lol community that is quite clear.