Power of The Analyst: Why EU May Be Falling Behind

Riot·6/9/2014, 8:57:25 PM·0 votes·4,409 views
Esports organizations in Asia have maintained full supporting staffs to aid their starting roster of players for years. North American LCS teams started adopting similar infrastructure last Summer, hiring analysts and coaches. Almost every NA team has an analyst on staff by now, ready to help their teams find new strategies and prepare for each opponent. And yet, EU teams have been slow to embrace analysts. Only a few exist in the entire region, and many players have been outspoken about not wanting one. At the same time, EU seems to have fallen to the bottom of the international scene. Is EU's resistance to analysts a major contributing factor to the region's recent decline in international events? Let's take a look at the key questions involved.

What Do Analysts Actually Do?

Esports organizations typically have two staff members focused primarily on helping teams play to their full potential: coaches and analysts. Alliance is one of the first EU teams to embrace a full supporting staff (and also the top team in Europe as of this writing, it should be noted). "An analyst mainly contributes game knowledge," Alliance's AD carry Tabzz explains. "They dedicate time to watching other regions' gameplay and try to find new trends that might be useful to the team. Before LCS matches, our analyst helps us analyze our opponents' habits and determine how to get advantages in draft and strategy." Analysts focus on the in-game choices of the team, like strategies, rotations, and team comps. Coaches, on the other hand, help with things outside of the game, such as communication, mindset, and practice regiments. Jordan "Leviathan" Thwaites, Alliance's coach, has found tremendous value in having an analyst to work with, and has some specific expectations. "Analysts help keep up with trends and make sure our plays and strategies are fresh and innovative," Leviathan explains. "The analyst and I worry about collecting data and translating it into something the team can learn from. That way, the team can stay concentrated on how they play."

Do Analysts Make a Difference?

The members of Cloud9 - the team that pioneered analyst use in North America - believe they've benefited greatly from the objectivity their analyst Charlie provides. He's helped them focus on the big picture elements, which can be lost when focusing on your individual role, and helped settle arguments between players quickly so they can avoid conflict. Tabzz has also found that his team's analyst has helped them fix mistakes, and identify changes that can improve their chances of winning games, like how to secure key objectives. Alliance's results (currently No. 1 in EU) certainly seems to indicate that the analyst is helping. The most compelling argument, though, is Supa Hot Crew. Last split, the team faced relegation and now are third in the region. One of the team's big off-season upgrades was hiring former SC2 pro (and D1 Korea LoL player) LastShadow to be their full-time coach and analyst. LastShadow lived in a Korean gaming house for two years, enjoying the infrastructure provided to pro teams there and is doing his best to support SHC in a similar way. Double-dipping on the roles by hiring one person to be both coach and analyst seems to be the best many EU teams are willing to try so far. ROCCAT recently released their analyst and gave both duties to their coach Veggie. But that still leaves them with one of the more robust staffs in the EU region. Veggie thinks every pro team should have an analyst and/or coach because of the time it takes to do those jobs. He explains: "Combining all of the practice pro players need to do with the will, intelligence, and free time required to properly analyze is basically impossible without making one of those aspects worse in quality. There's not enough time."

Why is EU Not Hiring Them?

Tabzz recently ranted about what he calls "EU's terrible infrastructure", and told us that, "it's because the EU-based organizations are reluctant to invest more than they deem necessary in their team, even though such investments could help their team grow a lot." Not every player shares Tabzz's feelings, however, which could be a big part of the reason why EU teams are resisting analysts. Even Vander on ROCCAT is suspicious of an analyst's true value. "It's mostly not possible for an analyst to have complete data," he explains, "because players have a lot of secret smurf accounts that they use. There are certain situations that [dedicated] analysts are useful, but I think in our situation Veggie is enough for us." Roccat's Xaxus is more convinced, however. "I agree with Tabzz," he explains, "that a structure behind the teams is a must. Currently a lot of the players in Europe especially have their egos high, and a lot of the time they won't listen to coaches or other players on the team." Xaxus thinks every team needs a stable controlling body around it, but isn't sure that EU is ready for it, since the change will be drastic. He believes that it will take a new generation of players rising up before it can take place. No team has been more vocally insistent that they didn't want an analyst than Fnatic, even after they entered their losing slump last split. Despite constant losses and criticisms from outside, the players repeatedly said in interviews that they didn't need an analyst and that they could solve the problems themselves. However, after a disappointing performance at All-Stars that heralded cries from the community of EU's decline, Fnatic is finally looking to hire an analyst. Their jungler, Cyanide says that their performance at All-Stars is what finally convinced them that it was needed. "We were finally shown the reality," he says, "that even if we're individually good players, we can't win just by that. We're just people after all, so we can't do everything by ourselves, and having a pair of eyes outside of the team can provide a very useful perspective." "The game is more about the theory than people realize," he continues. "And I don't see a way that a skilled analyst wouldn't help at pointing out mistakes and offering solutions to fix those mistakes… I expect hiring an analyst to make a large impact on us. Having someone outside of the game who can break down each and every play is vital to a team's success." As the level of professional play evolves, analysts are going to become necessary if EU wants to keep pace with, and hopefully even pass up, the other regions. "In the past, I feel like the theory behind the game didn't have that much impact," Cyanide says. "But with the meta shifting and players becoming more and more skilled, any small advantages counts more. Before, you could outplay the enemy, kill them and snowball the game, even if they had a group of a thousand analysts and you had zero." That era, it seems, is now over.

Closer

Despite more EU players beginning to acknowledge the value analysts can bring their teams, hiring an analyst is still considered a fairly brash move in the region. Whether caused by a resistance to cutting another paycheck or stubbornness to accepting outside advice, most teams seem content to let their players try to solve their own problems. Cloud9’s Hai issues a challenge to every team currently resisting analysts: "If they want to improve, they should look into getting an analyst. There's nothing to lose from getting an analyst, but everything to gain." Time will tell if EU teams will give analysts a real chance. I hope they do. Josh Augustine's favorite champion is Thresh, he's never enjoyed a Darius, and he will always go for the kill, even when he knows he shouldn't. He currently works as a game designer on EverQuest Next at Sony Online Entertainment. He’d love to talk with you on Twitter.

Related Articles

39 Comments

Dewrit0s6/10/2014, 10:23:40 AM11 votes

I'm surprised SK Gaming wasn't even mentioned. If I recall correctly, they have a coach, an analyst, and even a sports psychiatrist to help them. Even if they aren't the best individual players, they have a nice strong foundation backing them and it's obviously working out.

Ssataniko6/10/2014, 12:15:05 AM9 votes

EU is incredibly mediocre with only one strong team and a lot of underwhelming teams. And lack of analysts isn't the only excuse. I do find it highly amusing that EU fans almost unanimously hailed LMQ's entrance into NA as being "good" for NA, making it more competitive and improving play. Perhaps EU now should let an all-Chinese or Korean team into their Challenger series to "improve" their play. But they would never allow that to happen. Insularity reigns.

Palavko696/10/2014, 2:53:39 AM7 votes

Okay so... Last split EU was much better, one split( not even finished) NA is better and suddenly EU has fallen at the bottom of the international scene xD Lets see, John Augustine is from California( a bit bias perhaps?). I'm not saying EU doesn't need analysts, but it's ridiculous to claim that after half a split EU is weaker than all other regions( while praising Alliance). We'll see who's weaker at Worlds, no need to huff and puff and yell 'murica yet.

IS107ac16cf7f6a7bfe27366/10/2014, 5:04:23 PM3 votes

What proof do you have of EU falling behind lol?Watch them leave NA in dust on Worlds like always in the past

SecondComing6/10/2014, 11:23:14 AM3 votes

I don't think analysts make that much of a difference. If every analyst knew everything (as they appear to do and boast in LCS), all teams who had analysts would be top place and dead even while the rest would struggle.

Alliance is first place NOW, and they use it as an argument. How convenient. What about not so long ago, when Froggen and crew really struggled and they fought to avoid last place with Millenium? The same time when ROCCAT were newcomers and dominating in the first run. Fnatic are really dominant in EU and their results prove that. They may not seemed invincible and 1st place uncontested during last split, they lost the final game vs SK that would determine 1st place (in the details). But in the play-offs, they showed who's boss in the region. Yeah, they underperformed greatly in All-Stars but that were not just Fnatic. Everyone saw that Koreans and Chinese are light years away currently (not because of coaches and analysts), since they made Cloud 9 and Fnatic look like random wood VI players-teams that both dominate in their regions. But who reached IEM Finals? Fnatic. EU worst region eh? Yeah, cool story bro.

In the end of the day, the players are who sit down, log in and play the game while communicating. It's not the analysts and coaches that play between themselves. So, the largest % of both victory and defeat (for defeat, nobody would ever blame coaches and analysts ofc) goes to the players.

P.S. Sorry for the long post.

PedestrianA6/10/2014, 4:55:55 AM3 votes

To Hai: There is definitely the money to lose, people usually forget the money aspect but it has always been the thing that defines everything.

I do think the esport industry has already grown big enough to support an extra man of salary though.

M1SF1T6/10/2014, 9:29:58 PM2 votes

EU isn't at the bottom of the international scene, they're just lazy. NA is consistently decent, but could never match up to really high level regions like China and Korea. EU is different. Take it to a tournament that actually matters and EU players will put up an incredible fight against even the Koreans, but for the split and stuff like BOTA they'll screw around with unorthodox picks and sloppy plays (Mid Renekton lol). Remember SG Ozone being knocked out at worlds? I do.

finallylupus6/10/2014, 8:16:20 PM2 votes

EU is definitely falling behind and you don't have to be a genius to see it. All Stars was a huge wake-up call. If you look at the current split, Alliance and SK are the premier teams while the others are just floundering around.

PHILOSOPHERSSSSS6/10/2014, 8:45:02 PM2 votes

I have to say that an analyst is really needed on one lcs team. Anyway anyone should say nothing about regions are better than other , you never know who perfoms better at a game even the best players lose because they arent gods they are people like us that just read this article . So just wait the worlds and stop saying EU is better than NA because even if im from EU i cant really say EU is better because NA's level is getting bigger and bigger in NA there are LMQ TSM C9 DIG and CLG and they are strong teams .

C4oth6/11/2014, 6:33:43 PM1 votes

I was checking the teams there http://lol.gamepedia.com/League_of_Legends_Wiki and I saw that 3 NA teams have an analyst while 3 EU teams have an analyst

and I got the feeling that some of the articles here are just made up

Hreef6/10/2014, 12:51:34 PM1 votes

When the part came to Fnatic I looked forward to read about another critical point of the problem because beside all the prejudices some teams in EU might hold there is another big factor to hiring an analyst which was mentioned by Rekkles in an pre-game interview: Even if you want to hire an analyst you first have to find a person who is qualified, dedicated and gets along with the team at least to a certain part. Based on the fact that this job was not yet very acknowledged in the EU region I guess there is only a little pool of known analysts from here. So even if a team wants to hire someone for the job the search for a possible candidate might take some time if they look for someone from EU and if they look at other regions to find someone it probably has to be someone who is not yet hired as people like that most likely don't want to change places that easily. Nontheless I do hope as well that EU teams start to take up people for that job

Mir α6/10/2014, 1:33:31 PM1 votes

Ahri Akali Fiddlesticks