Anatomy of a 2v1 Lane Swap

Riot··0 votes·12,462 views
What used to be an occasional phenomenon in 2014 has become the norm. The 2v1 lane swap was primarily used to shield a weak bottom lane before the 4.4 patch. The reasons for that are numerous, not the least of which is that a top laner could grab jungle camps without the jungler holding his or her hand. The 4.4 patch was the catalyst for the 2v1 proliferation thanks to the extension of Trinket's starting cool down from 90 seconds to two minutes.

4.4 Changes Everything

As stated, the main reason for so many more 2v1 lane swaps is tied to extending Trinket starting cool down, but what does that actually mean? How did it do that? The extension stopped teams from being able to protect themselves from a late invade on a consistent basis, so teams adapted and invaded with three or four members early, and then fell back to their buff on the same side of the map. In effect, the middle lane bisected the jungle instead of the river. The entire point was to protect the jungler and allow a blue and a red buff to be secured. The alternative, as seen in the clip below, is a very unfortunate circumstance.

18 Comments

stargazer3315 votes

No it isn't interesting. These lane swaps are so incredibly dull to watch that I'd rather tune in to Bronze and Silver subwars on Twitch.

TheKleptonator5 votes

let me gain some summoner 13 here... you'd rather watch a bronze match ( Darius ) than learn something from the pros ? item 3070 item 3151

EminemGOAT3 votes

What pros ? TSM was BEATING EVERYONE, same GAMBIT, and then this patch comes, this is not a balance to the game, it is a NERF to TSM and Gambit. Yea, Gambit, the only pro russian team, and TSM, the only pro team that is a team formed from friends on a site, not a company that wants to dominate games and marketing. Yea, those two teams were almost no-one for the great companies, but they proved to be a threat, so Riot decided that those teams must go down, and down to the bottom. Wait, there's more. TSM is American, and they are punished only with rank 2 instead of 1, but Gambit are russian, they go to rank 5 in EU, nice. plus they put at All-Stars Diamond and Bjerg in the same team, bet they will lose every match, just cuz they are a threat and they must be taken down.

Skumfúk7 votes

there is a great fanboy talking xD

HeWolf3 votes

I don't like the way that laning phase has been removed from top and bot. I don't like how the jugle/fast-push tactics have dominated the whole map instead of a buff invade that only denies some early levels. I don't like a lot of things about this new playstyle, but that conspirational theories you told are just too creative IMO.summoner 21

Remdog1 votes

7 winstreak... fnatic might have gone on a massive lose streak, but they were still dominiating

Boerner1 votes

so your point is that the new patch comes out, coz Gambit is Russian and they must be taken down ? I think Gambit just fail the first Playoff-Day completly and so they lose. Btw i dont see a big difference between the creation of TSM and CLG. I dont like these 3/4-man-pushes either, but thats league: The meta change, its a progress and that's why it's so fun to watch and gets never boring.

NeoDeimos1 votes

What you fail to notice through your homer-colored glasses, is that Gambit was NOT dominating prior to 4.4. They only had one week the entire season where they went undefeated. I.E. Other than week 3, Gambit lost at least one game, REGARDLESS of which patch they were playing on.

Toyo2 votes

TSM is not doing well with the patch because they struggle with adapting to change.

Stop fanboy'ing. Really gets irritating.

Moreton1 votes

Shhh! He knows too much.

stargazer331 votes

what is there to learn? you ever gonna 4v0 swap in soloQ? think not. And yes, Trick2G's bronze subwars are infinitely more entertaining than these swap matches.

Gileann8 votes

Invades in the jungle are fun (and smart) sometimes, but not every match. Same goes for these.

I, for one, find them interesting. I don't want every match play out with standard laning phases, and I don't want the 4v0 to be the new standard either. A variety of viable tactics, though, makes the game far more interesting.

warpedmind6 votes

i dont like the current meta with laneswaps either and i am with the others here. its so boring to watch and it disables the toplaners for several minutes. most of the LCS games i let it play in the background the first 15 minutes and only switch to it when i hear the crowd and the commentators shouting.

Runesage993 votes

I find the whole concept a little strange, and more than that, unnecessary. The whole process destroys the concept of laning and does not showcase the individual talent of the players. Also, if one team has elise/jax or any other split-pusher, well of course that team is going to win. The old lanes were exciting!! Bring them back TSM!!!!!!

nin72 votes

Well, it's kind of new and outside of most people (non pro, soloQ players) confort zone...we all think we know our laning (egregious as that thought may be)

That said, the whole laning phase with 1v1 and 2v2 farm contests that pros play may be a bit dull if not for the ganks. On the other hand, once the 4v0 rush is over there is so much map vision/control chaos that it's sometimes quite entertaining to see (and just to see, confort zone again) (and just sometimes, if teams rever to "standard" laning with fewer turrets instead of exploiting the situation it's kind of pointless)

And in any case, I have the impresion that this is what the korean difference is about, forcing a different pace into the game and getting map advantage, so pro teams have to adapt, either find counters or learn the drill.

Hetchy1 votes

Any X vs X is extremely boring if either X=0. 4 v 0 lane swaps, how could they possibly be interesting? Let's both just leave a turret and trade them? It's awful.

Synval1 votes

Awful change... Trivializes picks & bans (who cares if this champ is weak early game or gets "countered" he'll never face the counter anyway), picking late game champs like Leona support or Jax "top" has very little drawbacks, jungling became boring to watch because there is no gank decisions, just push 2 turrets fast and then farm feral flare on some Nocturne / Xin Zhao, that's even more boring than when we saw Vi, Pantheon, Elise, Lee Sin quartet every week. Definitely Riot should nerf "fast push" strategy, at the moment only mid lane is kinda a skill and pick-and-ban matchup, the other lanes don't matter that much, that's why we see a lot of bans towards either mid laners or really strong late game champions, no one bans Renekton or Lee Sin any more because who cares, we'll outscale them anyway...

More from Esports