Dear Wind Cat,
Thanks for responding! Before I'll reply to your points, I'd like to point out that it takes you little effort to accuse someone of lying, and also very little to call someone's approach retarded, their words bullshit, and their story a lie.
Now, as for an actual point-by-point reply:
First: As far as I know, you do both get a gromp buff if both people smite the gromp. If I've always been mistaken about this, then thank you for teaching me something new! I'll test it, because I don't like operating on what may be incorrect information. If I turn out to be wrong on this point, I feel no shame in admitting it. However - even if I would deny the jungler their gromp buff, losing next to zero health to their first camp and allowing them to almost instantly go for their second camp (or save smite for that second camp), will likely offset most of what losing your gromp buff means to your jungle route. And if what you say is true, I'll just make a point of smiting AFTER our jungler smited as well as informing him to smite first.
Second: Malph is melee and he is mana hungry if you play him with a focus of harass. I find it peculiar that you assume that I do without first asking me. The way I play Malphite, I don't harass. In fact - I hardly cast spells in lane at all. I'm there, catching skillshots that would otherwise hit my carry (I have a shield, he doesn't), and counter-engaging when they engage on him. For that purpose, I level my E first. I'm not there to harass the enemy, I'm there to ensure my carry stays safe and gets to farm. When they hard-on engage on him, I'm there to mess up the enemy ADC's attack speed and deal a surprisingly high amount of damage in the process. I'm rarely out of mana, and I rarely cast my Q unless the lane is in a state of perpetual fighting. I make it through laning phase just fine as well. Most of the time, I do not even have to use my potions.
Third: I've done just that and won the lane. I do the aforementioned (written under 2.), and with my runes and masteries, I should be more than tanky enough to last through the first few levels. Two biscuits of total rejuvenation do a whole lot for you, as does your shield. If I think that the lane is going to be too tough to play with a hunter's machete in my pocket, I wouldn't pick smite. I'm not silly. That aside, it's not the equivalent of going to lane without items. It's an equivalent of going to lane with boots and potions: not everyone can do it, as it gives you no direct combat stats. But it certainly builds into something, and it will certainly serve a purpose.
Fourth: I am not bullshitting honest people. I'm an honest person myself, and I don't lie to myself either. I usually take exhaust when I play support Malphite. But I never said that I played every support Malphite game with smite. I said that "I have played him as a support with smite". I was stating that I have experience playing Malphite this way, and that all of my observations thus stemmed from this experience. The point I was making was also not that playing Malphite this way is the only way I'd play him, or even my absolute favorite. I was answering Bear Champion's inquiry: "I really want to see a supp with smite... if you think about it, it's quite effective". Most of the time, I certainly do take exhaust when I'm supporting! But this totally depends on the situation and the needs of my team as well as the composition of the enemy team.
TL;DR: Don't accuse someone of lying if you haven't given them the opportunity to address your doubts. It's a very bad form of arguing and quite frankly reminds me of populist politics. I did not state that I got to diamond spamming support Malphite with smite, I said that I got to diamond playing support Malphite, and that I have played support Malphite with smite. Last, but not least: Malph support with smite is awesome and really fun to play.
Sincerely,
Kinaré