For those asking how FNC got higher. I'd like to tell you that it wasn't FNC playing and winning game, but other teams losing.
C9 lost to TSM, so they automaticlly lost some points, then TSM is not worth being higher than C9 due to lack of consistency.
Then we have Jin Air Stealths, which haven't playied any game in a while, and they didn't qualify to world as FNC did, and Starhorn Royal Club recently lost some games.
And speaking of all this thrash before worlds NA>EU, EU>NA. All I can say now is that NA LCS has been most competitive split ever in NA, and we remember when people were saying "EU is bad because 4 teams fight for 1st spot". Recently you had this situation in NA, and I can see people taking it differently than EU situation. In my opinion, NA should be scared of seeding against #1 EU, because Alliance showed dominance through split and in playoffs, but #2 EU shouldn't be scared of #1 NA, because TSM keep playing inconsistant. I think that Cloud 9 will be way more dangerous at worlds than TSM or LMQ (even when I like LMQ).
Why is FNC still a strong team, and have to be considered equal to Cloud 9.
- September/November 2013 - S3 Worlds - FNC Win
- March 2014 - IEM World - FNC Win
- May 2014 - AllStar - C9 Win
We see that last match between them was C9 winning. It was C9 with Link instead of way better Hai, which suggest that FNC struggles. And what we saw later in LCS, Fnatic did struggle in 1st half of the split going 7:7 (Weeks 1-6), but then, since July 1st they went onto 8 game winning streak. Finishing 2nd half (Weeks 7-11) of the split with impressive 12:2, FNC was best team of 2nd half by win:lose ratio, they showed consistency losing only to SK Gaming and Alliance.
I think that all people saying that FNC didn't deserve to get higher spot than C9, they don't consider facts, and team performance. They go with hype of NA LCS finishing later. I'd like to tell you that just because NA split finished later, this does not mean that NA teams deserve to get "free" points.
Even when matches were exciting, this was a very dirty game showing weaknesses of NA teams.
NA 29 Games playied 37 Champions picked, with
being considered the best pick going 13:4 overall.
EU 26 Games playied 44 Champions picked, with
being a mid tier pick finishing 8:9 overall.
If NA doesn't change their "pick Tristana win games" strategy, then NA will get crushed by EU, OGN, LPL strategies of using
,
,
, or just simple
ban.
In NA
wasn't banned or picked at all. In EU he was banned 16 times, picked 6 (going only 1:5), but we remember what happened last time NA considered a champion weak and ignored it because it wasn't viable. EU picked it, playied it, and won a game. NA must work on their picks otherwise they will get outpicked by other regions.
Koreans often leave something strong open, but they pick direct counter to "op" champion, as if they say "I dare you to pick it, I double dare you".