Skip to content

Interregional Movement Policy: Official Rule

Riot··2 votes·55,438 views
[UPDATE: 11/12/2014: The Policy has been updated to amend the grandfathering clause, which now includes players who played in the most recent Challenger Series Playoffs. See the update post for more information.] [UPDATE: 11/19/2014: The Policy has been updated to amend the "Losing Residency" clause, which now specifies 24 out of the last 36 months as opposed to just 24 months.] Last week, we gave you a preview of the new, global Interregional Movement Policy which will help balance local and foreign talent on professional and semi-professional teams. Today, we’re sharing the official rule for NA and EU LCS and Challenger Series. We’ll also share our the reasoning behind it along with a breakdown of each section of the policy. This rule will be reflected in the LCS 2015 ruleset, but is going into immediate effect now.

1.2 Regional Residency Requirement & Work Eligibility

a) Resident Defined. For purposes of this Rule 1.2, a player is deemed to be a "Resident" of a region if such player has legally resided and been primarily present in such region for no less than twenty-four months out of the thirty-six months immediately prior to such players' participation in the first game of the applicable tournament (i.e., a match in the World Championship Event, LCS, or Challenger Series). In defining a Resident, we sought to create a policy that defines Residents based on sustained and prolonged presence with a region, rather than citizenship or legal documentation. This policy makes sure that Residents not only have resided in the region whose league they wish to play in for a substantial period of time, it also gives every player the option of becoming a Resident for that league after a prolonged commitment. We used the language “primarily present” so that a reasonable amount of discretion can be used in allowing for vacations and other such temporary travel when considering eligibility. b) Certification of Residency. All players shall certify their residency upon participation in the World Championship Event, the NA and EU LCS, and the NA and EU Challenger Series by submitting an eligibility form, and providing proof of residency as defined in Rules 1.2(c) and (d). Each team is responsible for ensuring that its players meet the residency requirements in this Rule 1.2. It shall be a violation of these Rules, by both the team and the player, if a player (or his or her parent or guardian) provides false, misleading or incomplete information resulting in the misclassification of such player’s residency and region. A violation of this Rule 1.2 by a team or a player shall also be deemed a violation of Rule 10.2, and the disciplinary measures in Rules 10.5 and 10.6 shall apply. c) Proof of Residency. Any player over eighteen years of age may prove residency by the provision of documentary evidence sufficient to demonstrate actual residence in the region in which he or she wishes to play. Such documentary evidence may be in the form of one or more examples of:
  • i. Government Issued Documentation. A player may prove residency by providing copies of a driver’s license, voter registration form, vehicle registration, government benefits records, military or draft registration papers or other government-issued records or identification that demonstrate residency.
  • ii. Private Documentation. A player may prove residency by providing copies of school records, deeds, leases, homeowners association documents, utility bills (such as gas, water, electricity, cable, or telephone, provided that all show levels of use consistent with actual residency), bank records and statements, tax returns, insurance documents, medical records and employment records.
d) Residency of Minors. Players who are below eighteen years of age may prove residency by either:
  • i. School Records. A player may prove residency by providing proof of full-time attendance at school in the region, including by providing copies of report cards, enrollment documentation, or attendance records certified by school officials; or
  • ii. Parents’ Records. A player may prove residency by (i) providing documentary evidence of the parent-child relationship, such as a birth certificate that lists the names of parents, and (ii) proof that one parent lives in the region, which may be demonstrated by provision of documentary evidence sufficient to prove residency as specified in Rule 1.2(c), above.
Proving that a player has resided in a region for two out of the last three years can be a somewhat tricky process, so we’ve given categories of documentation that can help establish a player’s Resident status. This is ultimately a process that relies on making good judgment calls, but by permitting numerous categories of proof we can ensure that no player is left without options. We’ll be increasing the timeframe during which a team should submit its paperwork to register a roster change to make sure each change can be assessed within a reasonable period of time, and working with teams to collect paperwork that is acceptable for each circumstance. e) Starters. For purposes of Rule 1.2, as stated in Rule 3.2, a "Starter" is defined as one of the five players established in the Team's starting lineup for any given game. This part is fairly straightforward - we don’t want teams undermining the goal of this policy by keeping Residents on the bench while they play majority non-exempt non-Resident starting lineups. This rule ensures that the team actually playing is able to maintain a good balance of local and foreign talent. f) World Championship Event. The World Championship Event is intended to bring together the best teams from each region to compete, as representatives of their region, in a global competition. In order to foster this diverse global competition, nurture regional teams, excite local and global fans, increase participation from all regions, and ensure a fair and open championship, all teams competing in the World Championship Event must meet local residency requirements. At least 60% (three out of five) Starters on any competing team must be Residents or exempt non-Residents of the region they represent in the World Championship Event. This Rule shall ensure that the goals of the World Championship Event are achieved, without undue burden on players and teams, while promoting fair play and robust competition for all participants in this global competition. g) NA and EU LCS. The NA and EU LCS, including the NA and EU regular season and all matches leading up to the regional playoffs, are designed to identify the teams that will represent the NA and EU in the World Championship Event. In order to fulfill this mandate, all teams competing in the LCS and LCS-affiliated matches must meet the requirements in Rule 1.2(f) for teams participating in the World Championship Event, including the requirement that at least 60% (three out of five) Starters on each team be Residents of the region covered by the LCS in which they play. h) NA and EU Challenger Series. The NA and EU Challenger Series, including the NA and EU Challenger Series regular season and all matches leading up to the Promotion Tournament, are designed to identify the teams from the NA and EU that will be promoted to the NA and EU LCS and thereby have an opportunity to represent the NA and EU in the World Championship Event. In order to fulfill this mandate, all teams competing in the Challenger Series and Challenger Series-affiliated matches must meet the requirements in Rule 1.2(f) for teams participating in the World Championship Event, including the requirement that at least 60% (three out of five) Starters on each team be Residents of the region covered by the Challenger Series in which they play. This is the heart of the rule - having at least 3 players on every team be local to that region in some sense ensures that regional identity is preserved for a league. That principle should be reflected at every level of professional competition, from the Challenger Series all the way to representation at Worlds. Keep in mind that this specific version of the residency requirement is only going into the LCS ruleset, so it will only apply to LCS teams attending Worlds, not all Worlds-participating teams. i) Implementation of Rule Change; Grandfathering. Any player on the Active Roster of an LCS team or a CS team who participated in the most recent Promotion Tournament at the time of this policy change who would not satisfy the Resident definition in 1.2(a) will be considered an "exempt non-resident", which allows such a player to count towards the three Residents required pursuant to Rules 1.2(f), 1.2(g), and 1.2(h). Once an exempt non-resident has met the Residency requirement, that player will be considered a Resident. A player cannot simultaneously count as a Resident for one region and as an exempt non-Resident for another region. A player can choose to waive his exempt non-Resident status in favor of counting as a Resident for another region before December 31, 11:59 pm PST 2014. In the event that a team has two or more exempt non-Resident players as Starters, they will not be permitted to add any additional non-exempt non-Residents as Starters. This rule ensures that current LCS teams and CS teams who played in the Promotion Tournament do not have to change their rosters. In enacting the Interregional Movement Policy, it’s important to us that players already committed to playing in the region are not unduly harmed. At the same time, in the long term it’s important that changes to teams gradually move each team to a healthy balance of foreign and local talent, which is why we make the subtle distinction between Resident players and exempt non-Resident players. Allowing players to waive an exemption means that individuals who aren’t sure of the plans don’t get locked out of legitimate options. Players currently in NA can choose to waive their exemption if they would qualify as an EU resident, and vice-versa. We illustrated some examples of how exempt non-Resident status governs roster changes in our previous post on the subject - check that out here. j) Substitutes: All teams will be required to maintain at least one Resident player as a substitute at any given time. At no point in time will teams be permitted to make a substitution which is in violation of any provision of this Rule 1.2.: If for some reason a Starter is temporarily out of commission, we don’t want teams put in a position where they can’t field a roster in compliance with the Interregional Movement Policy. That’s why we’re requiring teams keep at least one Resident substitute on the roster as a failsafe. k) Losing Residency: For purposes of this Rule 1.2, a player who is considered a Resident for a region will no longer be deemed to be a "Resident" of that region if such player has been primarily present in another region for 24 out of the last 36 months. In the event that a player wants to take a break from competitive play, or has a short stint in another league that doesn’t work out, we want to make sure that they reserve the option of playing in the region where they were most recently a Resident. Giving the players the safety net of temporarily exploring options overseas without forfeiting Resident status is a priority for us, and that’s what this portion of the rule is meant to address. So, for example, an EU Resident player can join an NA team for a year, and if circumstances change and they want to go back to EU, they can do so without having lost their EU Resident status. l) Work Eligibility: Each player must submit proof that, at the time of any LCS-affiliated match the player wishes to participate in, he/she will be (a) a legal resident of a country in their region, and (b) work-eligible in the United States (for NA players) or Germany (for EU players). This is the same as the old residency rule: because portions of the Challenger Series and all of the LCS occur live and at a physical location, it’s important that players are present and eligible to work in the country where the event is being held. The Interregional Movement Policy is one that benefits the overall competitive ecosystem, and other regional leagues will be incorporating something similar to the NA and EU version of the Regional Residency Requirement & Work Eligibility and releasing their equivalents at their discretion. China (LPL & LSPL), Korea (OGN The Champions, Masters & NLB), and Southeast Asia/Taiwan (GPL & LNL) handling their regional residency requirements individually. The NA and EU requirement provides a robust framework that will not only preserve regional identity in the future, but permit a healthy amount of movement between regions that is to the benefit of esports as a whole.

Related Articles

69 Comments

GamerByt319 votes

I like this rule. It makes perfect sense to promote talent from within each region. It also doesn't prevent players from moving to a new region individually ala Berjerking and Lustboy etc. it does stop entire teams from moving (LMQ) which i whole heartedly agree with.

warpedmind3 votes

LMQ will not be targeted by this rule. but future LMQ-like teams, yeah

Spanglyspangle3 votes

Yeah but if they need to replace someone they may have issues.

jigg1 votes

It would really only affect them if they had to replace more than 2 people, wouldn't it? All 5 of their current players will be exempt from this rule, so as long as they have 3/5 of the original team, they should be fine.

KaLiIsLu1 votes

As I read, if they are only preplacing 2 players they should be fine. You are correct.

Aesulni9 votes

The tl;dr for those of you who care;

Riot is implementing the thing that people blew up at China for a few months back, calling them racists and what have you. 2 non regional players per team limit unless they were already playing in that region prior to this rule. In that case they are allowed to stay, however if they make any roster swaps it has to be towards getting back to the 2 non regional players per team.

C9 Scott Free 4 votes

I didn't consider it to be racist. Nationalism is good in my opinion and no one wants their home invaded on any level really.

Ssataniko3 votes

You seem to have it assbackwards if I'm reading your intent correctly. In fact, China implemented a much more stringent policy allowing no team to have more than 2 foreigners, and no one complained. Then China and LMQ completely exploited the NALCS by placing an entire team of 5 foreign players in NA. And when a few NA fans complained there were endless cries that NA fans were "racist" when in fact they simply wanted a FAIR rule across the board for all regions. As it is LMQ has been welcomed in NA, even as China and its fans have been hostile and unwelcoming to the lone two Korean players in the LPL. Additionally China as a culture is far less diverse and open than North America, making it almost impossible for a foreign team to even consider competing there.

Aesulni3 votes

I was not touching on the the sentiments of either region/rule nor the actual tone of "racism" or if it is or isn't present in either case. I was simply offering a tl;dr and nothing more. So whatever "intent" you seem to be reading seems to be misplaced. I used the "racism" thing as something people would remember. It obviously worked. You seem to remember it quite vividly and still understand it.

That all being said, I support LMQ within NA. They earned their spot fair and square before the rule. I don't dislike the rule itself either. It's fine in it's current form. This thing was just a short rundown of the actual rule itself without getting into the nitty gritty. I apologize if you took it to be something more.

doroelexplorador9 votes

am I the only that is in complete disagreement with this rule?

Cyraknoss4 votes

I'm very against it, impeding the growth of both the LCS scene and global league player salaries all just to appease some racists is not the right move.

Spanglyspangle4 votes

Racist isn't quite the right word. People have no problem with asian competing in the NA LCS so long as they are residents. I believe the right word for what you're thinking is xenophobe.

KaLiIsLu2 votes

Well it adds stability to the religion. If you want to play here.. live here. It's all the LCS is saying.

NeroUS1 votes

Racist isn't quite the right word. People have no problem with asian competing in the NA LCS so long as they are residents. I believe the right word for what you're thinking is xenophobe.

It's not even xenophobic, people are not scared of them, they would just rather regional talent get a chance to play on the big stage.

01011000010001004 votes

I hate this rule. A Chinese team entering the scene just gave us the best LCS split ever.

Now we could have even more competition from Koreans coming in, but Riot is killing it in order to keep Complexity in the LCS...

KaLiIsLu1 votes

Seriously though, LOL, is for everyone. Each religion should have it's own identity and own talent. Otherwise we might as well just watch OGN and proclaim the winner there as the world champion.

01011000010001001 votes

It works for the major sports. NBA/NFL/MLB all hire the best players in the world, and the winner of the league is the world champion.

With League we would still have a separate World Championship just cause OGN and LPL are strong.

MrGangles2 votes

It works for all the major sports because the majority of the players on those teams are Americans. If you look at professional women's golf, they are having trouble growing that sport in America because most of the golfers on the circuit are Korean and the American fan base can't communicate with them.

There are no other leagues that play by the same rules as American Football and I think the NBA and MLB called their champions "world champions" when no other professional leagues existed and the title has stuck even though it is a little pretentious.

RadioactiveSnake4 votes

I dont see how anyone can be against this rule if they want a fair competition. The world cup and the Olympics use a similar rule to make sure they have the players from their region actually represent their region. NA needs to prove that they dont need a rule like this, because this is pretty much the only region that does this alot.

KaLiIsLu1 votes

@Radioactivesnake Agreed. NA and EU is talented however NA LCS do not believe in their talent hence we (NA) are always importing talent. I can see the NA LCS teams not having any NA members in the not so distance future if this rule was not in place. The only NA players that NA LCS teams have been picking up were from the roster of C9T. It's a shame since the challenger ladder is fill with talent.

01011000010001002 votes

Look at the NBA vs the Olympic basketball tournament. Which one is CLEARLY more exciting?

Chemtrail6 votes

I'm sorry, but best rule ever. They should have implement this way earlier. I never understood how can a full Chinese team can compete in NORTH AMERICAN LCS. I'm just sad that LMQ can stay. Sorry fans but this is unfair. It's like you go to a U15 local football competition and [insert pro team here, I don't follow football] shows up. It's not their place. Stop taking the chance away from North American players/teams.

SiLENTREiGN8 votes

Something something American dream, something something we're all foreigners in a way. I don't think there's anything more beautiful than a team with players from all regions working together to be the best in the world. I see LMQ for an exception, just teams like TSM, CLG and EG. That's the real American dream.

KaLiIsLu2 votes

I agree with.. I love diversity.

Earl Eulrich2 votes

Completely agree, it takes a lot of courage to leave for a new country to start anew. LMQ gave up their LPL spot in order to come over to NA and worked really hard to get the LCS Spot and qualify for worlds. THey earned their right to represent NA at worlds this year - that´s just undenyable. And they really brought a lot to the region, making the NA-competition a lot stronger than it had been in previous years.

I would really have been glad if something similar could have happened in EU aswell, as I feel some major contender from "outside" really helps the League to step up their game...and EU seemed a bit stagnant this Year.

NeroUS1 votes

I think this man is being ironic.

supercow3761 votes

I don't recall the american dream being foreigners coming together to accomplish a single task just to leave again

KaLiIsLu6 votes

Well stop putting blame on a full Chinese team. We also saw a full European team come over here and steal a spot in the LCS. This rule just forces each region to develop it's own talent and play that talent. And if they wish to get talent they need to have at least 60% or 3 members from the original roster.

Gaxx D5 votes

EG in NA was never "full European team" for god's sake. Innox and Pobelter were playing in american EG since Krepo, Snoopeh and Yellowpete moved here. At most it was 3/5, now it's only Krepo, yet people insist on calling EG "European team". TSM is more EU than EG.

FrosTByTeGoD5 votes

If they are going to limit the amount of people coming in internationally, then the next thing we need to do is to promote more international tournaments.

Cyraknoss2 votes

Man it's a good thing this rule is now here to save us from Miracle, Ringer, Helios, Amazing, Seraph, Quantic gaming, and plenty more. Wouldn't want C tier foreigners just walking in and being the best in NA with no effort or competition.

TooPrettyToDie5 votes

Amazing was not a C tier foreigner. He was one of the best junglers in EU.

Super Janemba8 votes

LOL Amazing was a two trick pony in EU and most of his time in NA, he was easily a C tier player when in EU with an exploitable weakness.

KaLiIsLu3 votes

The only thing amazing about amazing was his name. Oh and once in a while he'll do a Lee Sin kick but other than that, if you banned Lee Sin, he wasn't so amazing.

01011000010001004 votes

If we don't want C tier foreigners to be the best in NA, then NA should step it up. Why are we protecting NA laziness?

Aerilux4 votes

If anything, it forces NA players to work harder. :D

KaLiIsLu1 votes

Yes sir! That is does.

Bersque2 votes

Although the ruling may reduce the amount of high-level players in the western scene, it makes sense because if this rule wasn't implemented, Korean and Chinese teams like LMQ can just come in to NA willy-nilly and excel here to get into the World Championships which would've been something they wouldn't have been able to do in their home regions. If the LCS was filled with nearly all foreigners, I really think that would decrease LoL popularity in the west because a lot of westerners may just give up on being a pro because "no one is as good as the Koreans".

FatedTitan1 votes

Here's my question: Is there a roster lock rule in place for Playoffs/Worlds? If not, this should really be implemented. We don't want a Coast to happen to an LCS team. It's unfair to the players who have worked hard to earn that spot.

FatedTitan1 votes

In fact, I'd say it needs to be 3 weeks before playoffs to avoid a player playing all split, then getting kicked off right before playoffs.

Aesulni3 votes

You need to re-read this. Anyone playing in the LCS, or Champions or name your league that follows this rule, prior to this rule being implemented would fall under a "exempt non-Residents" and thus would not be subject to any sort of "getting kicked off right before playoffs"/worlds.

Sailor Mint3 votes

He's talking about starters playing the entire season only to get replaced by a brand new player at the very end of the season.
We've also had LCS teams poach NACS players right before playoffs.

There should be some kind of roster locking, and teams should only be allowed to switch between starters and subs past that point.

FatedTitan1 votes

This.

The Real Stanson1 votes

So what about Bjersen, amazing and lustboy? Can they play at worlds? Cause if not i'll be very angry!!!!!!!!!!!

DragonPup23 votes

They are exempt from the ruling as they were in region before the rule change. See Grandfathering.

MFG Colour1 votes

which is really stupid as it puts them at an advantage to every team going in

Mytherrus6 votes

How so? LMQ and TSM didn't have a supreme advantage over other teams this split, in fact, it was very close for most of the split.

MFG Colour1 votes

because you assume the reason for the rule is foreign players are better than the current players in NA. With that assumption anyone who has access to foreign players is at an advantage to those who don't. And if this split shows anything it's that LMQ and TSM were way ahead. (LMQ first all season and TSM going from a joke team to one that comes in first)

Ann Loris1 votes

I read it more or less and it sounds confusing at first but surely makes sense.

Now I have a question. It is said that this ruleset only applies to NA and EU LCS/CS. But there's also a paragraph specifically about World Championship. Does that mean that teams copeteing in Leagues where the ruleset won't apply have to somehow produce teams that meet te requirements anyway? I think it would make sense to be like that but then again how are you going to force them? (not that it is a problem in Korea or China, lol)

Mytherrus2 votes

NA and EU are the only regions with LCS and CS, the other regions are controlled by other parties who can impose their own specifications for the interregional laws. Riot is stating (and probably imposing) these laws on other regions to make sure that all teams follow the same rules at Worlds (which is under Riot's jurisdiction).

As you said, it isn't going to be much of a problem in KR and CN, but enforcing this rule makes things uniform, and teams are already notified, so there's no excuse.

More from Esports