Fnatic vs TSM at MSI

jewliciousness·5/7/2015, 9:21:50 PM·2 votes·1,366 views

I've been listening to the casters talk quite a bit now about how Fnatic and EU in general weren't looking to great coming into this tournament because of their playstyle not being good enough, but now they're looking great according to them. I just wanted to open up the discussion on this with the thought -- maybe their playstyle isn't good enough and maybe they're still not looking all that great, but everyone gets lucky every once in a while. You can't beat a team of TSM's caliber without having luck on your side (I would reference the casters themselves saying that everything in Fnatic's crazy playstyle managed to go well for them in this game).

Thoughts?

12 Comments

T RexHasTinyArms5/7/2015, 9:27:27 PM4 votes

I think fnatic prepped well. You don't win a game that hard on luck. When you prep well though you can throw a strong team off their game and win hard like that. Reignover is really strong and Huni is great, and TSM didn't play up to expectations. Fnatic was under rated more than suddenly getting better. (Which is hard for me to say since I'm an NA fan lol.)

Vonspooker5/7/2015, 9:36:20 PM2 votes

I think for you to say anything in that game was luck is extreme denial.

Dyrus choked a bit in toplane but ultimately FNC just got the strangle going and didn't let go.

PoisonedTea5/7/2015, 9:42:04 PM1 votes

yes but they won with cheese. EU wins with cheese.

Nucleophilic atk5/7/2015, 9:45:36 PM1 votes

It's actually because of competition. I don't think NA will do that well in worlds because there are too many "lolz jus a gayme nuub" players that literally rush to defend intentional feeders for some reason. I don't know, hope they do well...but don't see TSM winning this little tournament thingy at all.