Skip to content

Quick Gameplay Thoughts: May 11

RiotMeddler··1 votes·50,856 views

Hey all,

Usual Disclaimers

These posts will often contain talk about future work we're doing, or planning to do, that isn't yet guaranteed to ship. The nature of the work could change or, depending on what we discover, projects mentioned may get put delayed or even stopped. If you'd like to see a Tweet whenever a new one of these posts goes up: https://twitter.com/RiotMeddler

More solo carry potential work

We're continuing to work on changes that get a bit more solo carry potential back in the game. 8.10's got the bounty changes (solo gold, not team gold) and jungle changes (junglers not being able to level 3 gank as early). For 8.11 we're looking at shifting some tower gold, on both outer and inner towers, from team gold to solo gold, focus that increased power more on whoever's gained that advantage for their team.

One important thing to note is that increased solo carry potential is going to result in more cases of single champions snowballing and deciding the game. We think we've pushed too far on teamplay, hence some movement back in the other direction. Does mean there'll be more cases of one person doing well, getting fed and dominating though. If your actions as a single player can carry the game, so can other people's. We think that’ll be good overall, but will come at some trade off.

Other 8.11 Changes

Banner of Command:

  • Looking to make it less rushable. We think Banner creates some cool strategic play post laning phase. During lane though it tends to just somewhat degrade laning interaction, particularly on champs who use all of its stats pretty well (hi Sion). Might do something like make the bonuses it gives minions scale with champion level as a result.

Celerity

  • Celerity's currently a strong all purpose choice in its row that drowns out other options too much. As always on movement speed it also contributes to creeping up average speeds. We were going to make some changes to it in 8.10 with the other minor runes balancing, but concluded something a bit larger was needed than just numbers tweaking. Going to be looking at modifications like MS only in combat, or after every ability cast, rather than on all the time as a result.

Shurelia's

  • Currently looks too good on a few champs using it primarily personal power (Vlad, Singed etc) and not good enough on those picking it up to help their team (supports for example). Going to look at equalizing that a bit (team users stronger, other users weaker, or at least not stronger again).

Champions

  • We'll continue work on Taliyah and Kha'Zix that was started during 8.10 but didn't make the cut off for the patch.
  • Other champion balance changes to come too, we're currently trying an approach where we focus on systemic stuff (items, runes, jungle etc) early in the patch and then champion balance implementation kicks off a bit later. More details to come as a result.
  • Likely for smaller changes we take a look at at least Sejuani (hit too hard by recent changes) and Zyra (seeing what we can do to make plants a bit better without putting them back in 'it's not worth paying the cost to kill these' land).

Sterak's

We'll be holding off on Sterak's changes (e.g. decoupling it from TriForce builds somewhat) until we know where other possible fighter item changes are up to. Will revisit in a few patches as a result.

http://ddragon.leagueoflegends.com/cdn/6.24.1/img/champion/Ziggs.png

285 Comments

wobaji26 votes

{quoted} More solo carry potential work

We're continuing to work on changes that get a bit more solo carry potential back in the game. 8.10's got the bounty changes (solo gold, not team gold) and jungle changes (junglers not being able to level 3 gank as early). For 8.11 we're looking at shifting some tower gold, on both outer and inner towers, from team gold to solo gold, focus that increased power more on whoever's gained that advantage for their team.

One important thing to note is that increased solo carry potential is going to result in more cases of single champions snowballing and deciding the game. We think we've pushed too far on teamplay, hence some movement back in the other direction. Does mean there'll be more cases of one person doing well, getting fed and dominating though. If your actions as a single player can carry the game, so can other people's. We think that’ll be good overall, but will come at some trade off.

This is probably the worst aspect of the game right now. It's not fun feeling at the mercy of your team to win the game. That creates toxicity because people feel that they don't have agency to carry if they get 1-2 truly clueless players. Their performance is intricately tied to that of their teams and when there's a huge disparity, it creates enormous frustration. If you've got a troll or someone not really trying or playing in a selfish way (hello full AP Sona), it's even more demoralizing because it feels like you got trolled and despite being serious and doing your best - perhaps even playing near flawlessly, these players robbed you of the game. They have that power over you and in S4 it didn't feel like this was the case as much. I remember using hypercarries like AP Kog and being able to win 6-25 games if the enemy team was toying with us too long (hello Zeds spamming laugh in base for 5 minutes straight). It's also not fun to watch and makes people appreciate high ranked or pro players less. Even watching pros, it's often "oh, he gets the worse team so he loses" or "oh, his team is quite behind" so he's useless. No flashy plays, no outplay from a 5 year LCS veteran.. just waiting for the FF vote or trying hard but being ineffectual.

On top of that, you've got this massive snowball meta where being behind is a death sentence (again making it really hard to win if you RNGd a worse team). It's not enough that the enemy team has way more gold/levels/dragons etc., they also get more pushing minions, nearly unstoppable Baron/Rift pushes and so on. Watching a tennis match with a lopsided score can still be exciting because each point exists in a vacuum. There have been comebacks from 2 sets down and match point. The better player that day wins but it doesn't feel like "because he won the first set" now his opponent has no chance. No, he won the first set because he was better but now if his opponent is better, he can just as easily lose the next set and the match. You're not artificially rewarded.

League shouldn't be this extreme since you want players to be rewarded for good play/to be able to close out but the discrepancy created by Baron/Rift, the easily killed turrets, the pushing waves when behind etc. make comebacks few and far between even if the other team is playing like monkeys. It feels like getting ahead almost guarantees a win no matter how badly they play after that (as long as they don't get Baron stolen). They don't have to play well the entire game and this makes it a horrible match when it is a bit destabilized by one lane or something like that. It also makes luck far more important. A good player can only really exert his skill in the first 15-20 minutes because after that it just snowballs like crazy in either direction and the quality of decisions has little influence. In a tennis match or other sports, you have to play well the entire time to beat a player (no matter the score). You don't get to chill just because you're ahead. You can afford to lose more points but you're not handed free advantages in each individual point.

Coming back even with a scaling comp. is not just an uphill battle but a near impossibility. Even competitive play shows this. It's just win early -> clean/efficient stomp, first securing baron vision + a pick if possible -> baron -> unavoidable game winning push. Comebacks shouldn't be artificial like how catch up XP made it a while back but they should ALWAYS be possible if the enemy team makes enough mistakes. Why would I want to watch or play a game where if my team is shit I'm useless and also stuck there another 10-15 minutes? If at least I feel there's a solid 10-20% chance to scale up, outplay etc. I'd have my head in the game more and people would rage/blame less too. Raging and blaming happens mostly because a player has mentally given up on winning the game.

Right now, it's just terrible when behind. You can't even leave base or fight if you get the perfect engage. The base just crumples, the minions kill you during the fight etc. It's mentally draining and not fun. It also warps the meta for champions and strategies. S4 and S5 were both FAR more interesting to play and watch. I still remember the amazing CLG matches with split pressure.

Now, competitive especially is like watching paint dry and that's coming from a devoted fan. I don't see the solo carries like in the past with SKT's Bang holding the base and acing the enemy team with 3 inhibs down almost by himself on Ezreal... amazing match and skill. I don't see the nail biters and the tension. I don't see the outplays (reducing JG gank options won't help this). I see one team stomp or one team get stomped. It's almost robotic. There were super tense matches I linked to my friends years back and I haven't for a single one this year.

Even small leads snowball way too hard because you just can't do anything. Turrets are taken easily/dived, you're zoned from objectives, what do you even do? Every mechanism artificially makes the game unwinnable after a lead is created. That's the key word ARTIFICIALLY. It's not just their items and level advantage. You can try to play around that or scale. It's everything else. It's like if someone playing tennis and up a set then gets a "fun new mechanic" where his ball speed on hit is increased by 50%. Now, it's not just the opponent having to battle from behind a set. They are also having to play a really unfair match. This is how League games feel when behind.

I think Baron and Rift probably just shouldn't exist in their current form. They make the game a lot worse. Even if you want minions to push/takedown structures, maybe don't make them do so much damage to champions too. Let the other team have a chance to at least fight and hold their ground rather than just autolose. There's just so much artificial help for the winning team and it makes the game much less fun on either side. Even removing base turrets completely but not having Baron/Rift or artificial super strong pushing would be so much better. Maybe at least give the enemy team some options to counteract it if you keep it the same? Perhaps something like shrines which can disable baron minions in a particular lane etc. Create ways to give the team from behind a chance to outplay. A fair chance that they need to earn not just "oh here's some free catchup XP and a lot of shutdown gold". Shutdown gold is maybe OK but it seems to overly punish you for being ahead and making a mistake. It's not an equivalent exchange. Your mistake becomes bigger than the enemy team's in the same situation even though I see no reason why this should be the case. It's another artificial mechanic.

Your goal should be to make the game require fair but quality play at all points. No artificiality, just skill (with multiple dimensions required and less down time). When being ahead is all that matters, there isn't even much skill expression possible when significantly behind. It rewards getting a lucky lead rather than outplaying. This even makes matchmaking worse if a few players managed to RNG that 5-10 games in a row and are then placed way above their true skill. This reduced skill expression because of how critical it is to be ahead also makes it much more important to play meta junglers who are strong early/mid game. It all becomes so constrained.

Being ahead needs to give advantages but nothing insurmountable and it shouldn't be this "oh, we get a free win now because we got baron/are ahead". The behind team should always have options to come back that if ignored/not managed properly will allow them to turn the tables. If your game seems like a foregone conclusion just off a rift or baron, there's something really wrong with it and it leads to the "I give up mentality" that's so prevalent. Players give up as a result of their experience and seeing that should be a huge red flag for Riot that the game is NOT fun when behind because the ahead team gets too many artificial advantages just by virtue of being ahead, not any real sustained outplay. The complaint will be that "how will games end then?" "won't people be really risk averse and just farm all game?" "won't teams outplaying for 20 minutes be overly punished for one mistake throwing it all away?" This is fair and that's why it has to be well designed so that there are important objectives for both sides and in both situations. I think fallen turrets providing some sort of shrine you can capture to offset baron/supers somewhat could be a way to deal with it. If the enemy team wants to keep pushing, they have to take over that area of control and fight for it. Right now the game is only fun in the 25% or so games that are balanced. The stomps are kind of fun but not really because they are just too easy to win. Getting stomped sucks and is draining, especially if you had no agency. 25% of games being fun is not good. I want this to be a high skill came that is worth mastering but artificially winning from an early lead isn't OK.

LetYourSleepWane6 votes

game's just way too meta dependent... it's less about growing and understanding it by being a better player rather than just abusing broken shit/strategies

I don't feel like I'm better a lot of the time I win. I just pick a stronger champ while they pick a trash comp and then just can't do anything. say the enemy JG goes Lee and Pick Trundle. he has to win hard early or he's just useless if I just farm and he doesn't even win 1v1. He has a lot of mobility and playmaking but if we just group 5v5, it doesn't mean as much as Trundle pillar + dps + R. he can look cool playing Lee and then I just farm and show up for rift or dragon. we 5v5, we win. same with Elise and a ton of other junglers. they pick "cute" champs and I pick efficient champs. they basically win the games they'd win anyway and I win the close ones. they just diceroll the close games. "cute" champions like Ekko JG, Elise, Fiddle, etc. don't even have great late games so why are they taking all that risk? just snowball early and hope to have a 2-3k old lead by 10 minutes or useless. why would you ever pick them if you want to win? most ganks don't require a fancy cacoon or lee flash R, they just require a dumb laner overpushing with no wards/refusing to adapt to getting camped. it almost doesn't matter what you play there. you can even be a nunu and they'll still die. so who really cares that lee and ekko can go over walls or do other fancy shit? it doesn't mean anything in most teamfights and that's what makes or breaks the game. efficiency wins. flashy champs don't.

it's mostly about about picks/comp/meta, not individual skill/general game knowledge. if I have a shit comp and players 110 MMR higher, my chance to win is actually still worse despite the better players.

YourQQ11 votes

{quoted}

This is probably the worst aspect of the game right now. It's not fun feeling at the mercy of your team to win the game. That creates toxicity because people feel that they don't have agency to carry if they get 1-2 truly clueless players. Their performance is intricately tied to that of their teams and when there's a huge disparity, it creates enormous frustration. If you've got a troll or someone not really trying or playing in a selfish way (hello full AP Sona), it's even more demoralizing because it feels like you got trolled and despite being serious and doing your best - perhaps even playing near flawlessly, these players robbed you of the game. They have that power over you and in S4-S5 it didn't feel like this was the case as much. I remember using hypercarries like AP Kog and being able to win 6-25 games if the enemy team was toying with us too long (hello Zeds spamming laugh in base for 5 minutes straight). It's also not fun to watch and makes people appreciate high ranked or pro players less. Even watching pros, it's often "oh, he gets the worse team so he loses" or "oh, his team is quite behind" so he's useless. No flashy plays, no outplay from a 5 year LCS veteran.. just waiting for the FF vote or trying hard but being ineffectual.

On top of that, you've got this massive snowball meta where being behind is a death sentence (again making it really hard to win if you RNGd a worse team). It's not enough that the enemy team has way more gold/levels/dragons etc., they also get more pushing minions, nearly unstoppable Baron/Rift pushes and so on. Watching a tennis match with a lopsided score can still be exciting because each point exists in a vacuum. There have been comebacks from 2 sets down and match point. The better player that day wins but it doesn't feel like "because he won the first set" now his opponent has no chance. No, he won the first set because he was better but now if his opponent is better, he can just as easily lose the next set and the match. You're not artificially rewarded.

League shouldn't be this extreme since you want players to be rewarded for good play/to be able to close out but the discrepancy created by Baron/Rift, the easily killed turrets, the pushing waves when behind etc. make comebacks few and far between even if the other team is playing like monkeys. It feels like getting ahead almost guarantees a win no matter how badly they play after that (as long as they don't get Baron stolen). They don't have to play well the entire game and this makes it a horrible match when it is a bit destabilized by one lane or something like that. It also makes luck far more important. A good player can only really exert his skill in the first 15-20 minutes because after that it just snowballs like crazy in either direction and the quality of decisions has little influence. In a tennis match or other sports, you have to play well the entire time to beat a player (no matter the score). You don't get to chill just because you're ahead. You can afford to lose more points but you're not handed free advantages in each individual point.

Coming back even with a scaling comp. is not just an uphill battle but a near impossibility. Even competitive play shows this. It's just win early -> clean/efficient stomp, first securing baron vision + a pick if possible -> baron -> unavoidable game winning push. Comebacks shouldn't be artificial like how catch up XP made it a while back but they should ALWAYS be possible if the enemy team makes enough mistakes. Why would I want to watch or play a game where if my team is shit I'm useless and also stuck there another 10-15 minutes? If at least I feel there's a solid 10-20% chance to scale up, outplay etc. I'd have my head in the game more and people would rage/blame less too. Raging and blaming happens mostly because a player has mentally given up on winning the game.

Right now, it's just terrible when behind. You can't even leave base or fight if you get the perfect engage. The base just crumples, the minions kill you during the fight etc. It's mentally draining and not fun. It also warps the meta for champions and strategies. S4 and S5 were both FAR more interesting to play and watch. I still remember the amazing CLG matches with split pressure. ........

Not having shutdowns distributed will improve this. Now, they all get stronger so you don't even have a clear target to focus. Or, it doesn't matter because the whole team is so much stronger overall. League's bad enough when behind without rewarding players who don't deserve it.

The best way to make the game more fun is to have it be a bit like football with territory or score in other games. Make turrets REALLY FREAKING strong and reduce power for baron and rift. This way, getting these static advantages is very powerful but the other team isn't artificially gimped for combat and teamfighting.

BTW: A lot of players wouldn't enjoy winning as much if they made it so hard. People like to relax and mess around a bit in games with large leads. The winning team being a lot stronger and messing around a bit is part of the fun. If turrets really mattered, maybe the winning team could still do that a bit since a lost teamfight would just equal a turrets taken, not an inhibitor. The progress in territory would really matter, just like having a high score in a sport. It matters because it gives you a lot of chances to mess up without being behind but not because it gives you any other special advantages.

Also, teams definitely still can come back even now. It's not impossible. It's just hard and the winning team gets more than just what they earned through outplaying. On the other hand, if they didn't, a lot of early game risks or snowball picks would become silly. If a pick falls off or you're taking a high risk, you probably need more than just what you deserve to make it a good choice. I don't know what to think about this. Maybe there can be more fair ways of snowballing.

DeathBurst25 votes

Re: Celerity

Before Rune Reforged, it was possible to get +4.5% MS from Quint. This was not free, this was a big trade-off with a big opportunity cost. Yet, it was the right choice for some champs. Some champs desperately need that MS. Celerity was already weaker, and if it is going to be made more situational on top of it, I'm really not convinced it will be enough.

I don't like to write negative posts so early before we even see what's the replacement like, but if I wait too long, there will be no time to consider those champs that need it.

Don't nerf Celerity, make it a bigger trade-off.

Damarchus5 votes

Yeah, exactly. It's a good-all-use rune because it's right next to the situational early game CDR rune that becomes weaker as the game goes on and the EXTRA situational rune that is basically useless if you want to slug out damage like secondary runepath users might want.

With Celerity I know I can use that movement speed at all times, and I don't have to jump through hoops to gain it. It was basically designed as a decent rune choice for everyone. It's also already situational in a GOOD way, where if you can use a movement speed build, than you get even more use out of Celerity a normal -- "I need a rune and these others are pointless for me" -- user. If you just made the other 2 runes less binary -- which are right now either "I can use this or I cannot use this" -- than I'm sure they'd get more use.

Daunt1 votes

It actually is pretty free. Almost no champions took the movement speed Quints pre runes reforged. The only one i can remember was Twisted Fate.

Some champs desperately need that MS. Celerity was already weaker, and if it is going to be made more situational on top of it, I'm really not convinced it will be enough.

No they don't, they're balanced around not needing it. It's literally just a nice free stat that's unnecessary. And how is it weak? Meddler literally said how it's strong and how it's being taken the majority of the time over the other options.

DeathBurst9 votes

It actually is pretty free.

Now, yes. I was talking before. Reading comprehension....

Almost no champions took the movement speed Quints pre runes reforged.

Singed, Garen, Mordekaiser, Annie, depending on match-ups. And that's only for the champs I personally played. I'm sure there are others.

And how is it weak?

It's weakER. Because Celerity gives 3% MS and old MS Quint gave 4.5 and, you know, 3 is less than 4.5. Basic math...

how it's being taken the majority of the time over the other options

Yeah, which it shouldn't, I agree with that. Which is why I asked for it to be a bigger trade-off. I don't want everyone taking it.

But I do want the option to trade something for more MS if I want/need to. Trade, not be given for free, but still, this is an important option and it needs to be preserved.

So don't be an ass, and try to understand what other people actually say before replying to them.

Electro52215 votes

Considering the feedback you guys have gotten, what changes can we expect to the marksman changes coming in 8.11? Some notable calls I've seen are for:

A nerf to Ezreal, Jhin, and maybe MF.

Reducing or removing the True Damage from IE.

Lowering or removing the innate CDR on ER.

Possibly not reducing BotRK's price, and keeping it as is?

Also noticed you guys pretty heavily reworked Stormrazor. Any chance we'll see a different version of it in the future?

Daddy Ants13 votes

Fix Athene's Unholy Grail item 3174

It builds out of a Fiendish Codex which gives 35 AP but Athene's only gives us 30

???????????

Tuyangtudai10 votes

yeah and while they are it they should fix item 3092 it gives 25% manareg but item 3098 already gives 50%

Hupsis10 votes

item 3174 +30 ability power +100% base mana regeneration

UNIQUE – DISSONANCE: Gain +5 ability power for every additional 25% base mana regeneration.

In total: +50 ability power

Algorithmic Bias1 votes

and with the removal of mana regen. on D.Ring and Talisman it lost 10-20AP lane and 30AP on jungle so it still deserves a change

Hupsis3 votes

And which champions does this actually affect?

Gralph9 votes

Yeah, it's like saying Vamp Scepter gives 10% lifesteal but Death's Dance doesn't give any.

Perma CC12 votes

@Meddler Zyra

Would you guys ever concider making some reverts to Zyra? Like returning her to her old kit pre mid year mage update. I feel her old kit was much better then the current kit and her power was better distributed to areas of her kit where she could display skill rather then the RNG machine she feels to be now. I PERSONALLY feel her old Q Deadly Bloom was better prefering the range over the width. Also I feel having less plants that were more impactful was better then having a bunch of them that werent that impactful. And if not that change.... could you concider increasing Zyra's ROOT duration rank 1 so that its on par with other Mid Lane mages. ATM her 0.75 second root is not enough to peel a gank. I just see alot of area of improvement for Zyra as a champion and I feel like improving on her CC is smart as thematically Crowd Control fits her... Another idea I thought of was maybe lowering the Cooldown of her ultimate so its on par with other mages with similiar abilities. Orianna comes to mind... she has a fairly short cooldown on her ult and its much more reliable then Zyra's. OVERALL i would really like to see Zyra reverted to old, cause lets be honest... most of the mid year mage updates didn't hit the mark... and i feel zyra is one of them.

Edit (Also an idea for her plants. You could buff their range back to 750 and it would allow her to position her plants further away which would in turn make them last longer.)

https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/lRJANqvm-dear-riot-please-revert-zyra-to-pre-mid-year-mage-update

Harry iL MaGo6 votes

I agree. Her new kit is bad, if you buff her plans IA they are too toxic, if you nerf her plans IA they are too useless. I think it was better before: few plants but good and easy to balance. Please back old Zyra like LB and Rengar. item 3070

PS: Sorry for my eanglish.

Lesba Zyra10 votes

Exactly.

@meddler Zyra

can you rererse her Q or at least change its shape to be more thick? Also she is missing some scale, since it feels like playing with no rewards as a midlaner. Those champions like Brand and Zyra need some bigger rewards to be worthy as squishy midlaners. Maybe give her some AS scale just like Azir has?

ARE YOU PC BRO12 votes

ahem KARMA Karma

that is all

IxtaliKing7 votes

Meddler is on a 6 month cool down from discussing Karma xD

Shaian10 votes

https://clips.twitch.tv/HonorableMagnificentTardigradeNotATK

talking about zyras plants. its most important that players killing plants without playerinput just by how snares work gets fixed. especially unlucky interactions like mf corki graves still onehitting plants while being ranged

meteorbreaker9 votes

Hello Meddler!

Maybe it's worth it to revert? And already on the old Zyra to make trial changes? Now it is too badly balanced with this current passive. Sounds too much about the support position. A primary role does not take into account?

redniwediS8 votes

Celerity's currently a strong all purpose choice in its row that drowns out other options too much. As always on movement speed it also contributes to creeping up average speeds. We were going to make some changes to it in 8.10 with the other minor runes balancing, but concluded something a bit larger was needed than just numbers tweaking. Going to be looking at modifications like MS only in combat, or after every ability cast, rather than on all the time as a result.

Is it really contributing that much to average speeds? It provides slightly less speed than Movement Speed Quints did in the old rune system, but seeing as how it is probably more accessible in the new system I can kind of see why you might think this.

Dolivera8 votes

Hey Meddler,

Love the idea of changing bounty from team gold to solo gold. However, I'm a support main, and one concern I have is that if I, as a support, get a shutdown with an ignite, there is a strong likelihood that I will get flamed by my adc. Have you guys given any thought to making shutdown gold available not to the entire team, but only to the participants in the shutdown? If a top laner solo kills his fed opponent, his bot lane wont benefit, but carries wont get screwed by having shutdown gold taken by their jungler ganking their lane.

ToddlerPacifier8 votes

No one installed this game because they wanted to be impressed by team play. They played it and were attracted to it because they wanted to carry or appreciated amazing displays of skill by other players. Team play is not interesting and just breeds toxicity. I want to see and demonstrate individual skill above all. Most people want an audience, not a team. I want to see Faker's LB shit on everything not Faker's team carry him through "team play." Plus, team play just makes duo abusing even stronger and now you guys even allow Masters and Challengers to do it. I think it's pretty ridiculous that even top 25 challenger can have people duo abusing a lot. How can you even have players be "worshipped" or really impressive if you don't even make top 25 challenger just about individual skill? You tried team play, you tried the dynamic queue cancer that took a dump over competitive integrity and made this game a joke in many people's eyes, now bring it back to what people ACTUALLY want to see. It's a hell of a lot more fun even when stomped to watch some Ekko 1v5 rather than his team be all stronger everywhere and the people who contribute to the 'team" aspect most often don't even get any credit.

You might ask why I play a team game at all. Well, I enjoy the feeling of carrying them, of having an audience and of seeing different roles/champs all try to outplay each other. I sure as hell don't want to be dependent on them though. The social aspect is kind of fun too but again, the minute you make me highly dependent on them, you suck the fun out of it for me and make it feel like a chore. Even the people who play support mostly do it because they win more, it's very impactful but the competition is less fierce and they get a lot of positive feedback from the team. A lot of them would want a carry role if they were equally effective on it. It's just that support is more impactful than a lot of carry champs. But if you discover that you can be a Janna main and get Gold pressing just E while sitting behind your ADC, maybe you won't bother trying something else.

Also, the way the bot now punishes even banter from competitive players or criticism is just insane and that kills the game for people that actually are dedicated to it. It takes half the fun out of a competitive game. People even talk shit in spots all the time even if they might not do it on TV. Punishing plays for that kind of stuff so much just makes it a bland experience. Outright hostility, harassment etc. sure but not "your build is garbage" or "that was a derpy as hell play."

PowerOfDrainAge7 votes

I think Celerity needs the trancendence treatment. I mean you probably should increase the MS to 4.5% but make it available at lvl 10

Also, what are your current plans to do on Shurelya's? And, any thoughts on Galio?

YourQQ4 votes

{quoted}

I think Celerity needs the trancendence treatment. I mean you probably should increase the MS to 4.5% but make it available at lvl 10

Also, what are your current plans to do on Shurelya's? And, any thoughts on Galio?

Level 10 is way too long for just 4.5% MS. It better be at least 5% if I'm ever to actually do that and it still feels like a trap. Celerity is good now just because the other runes take so long to come online. It's not really anything that special and a lot of it is this get ahead early or lose style meta.

Tormentula7 votes

Please look into buffs forElise

She's still struggling after the recent buffs she got and she's a super early game reliant champ that struggles in the new "delayed ganks" jungle. She even loses machete's attack speed making clears slower and overall now she has no real options to make up for her season 7 runes pages (attack speed, scaling health primarily). Her level 2s aren't good either so she can't fight for scuttles over most champs.

Consider buffing one of the following: her human Q ratio, Base AD, or Base violatile spiderling W damage (you can nerf the ratio here for all we elise mains care).

Base AD would be highly appreciated since that nerf for worlds really hurt us Lane Elise players.

and pls pls PLEASE give her the MS back that she was nerfed from in 6.2 as a result of runic echoes's release, which in the new jungle update no longer gives the MS that got her speed nerfed in the first place.

wobaji7 votes

{quoted}

Celerity

  • Celerity's currently a strong all purpose choice in its row that drowns out other options too much. As always on movement speed it also contributes to creeping up average speeds. We were going to make some changes to it in 8.10 with the other minor runes balancing, but concluded something a bit larger was needed than just numbers tweaking. Going to be looking at modifications like MS only in combat, or after every ability cast, rather than on all the time as a result.

http://ddragon.leagueoflegends.com/cdn/6.24.1/img/champion/Ziggs.png

Ugh, Celerity is my favorite rune by far and the only reason it's taken so much is that the others are weak/situational. Level 10 especially for a JG takes ~15 minutes. Absolute Focus is really conditional and favors poke champions but poke champions are more vulnerable to ganks, more dependent on good positioning and value CDR highly, thus even those champions frequently favor the other runes above it. The exceptions are mostly when hitting break points for waveclear.

I really don't want Celerity ruined. It's by far my favorite rune in the tree and now you've already taken MS off Runic Echoes. It makes it even harder to be useful jungling. We can't even level 3 gank. It's like lanes are becoming hermetically sealed from JG interaction and we're reduced to PvE. I like planning out efficient pathing and good strategy but I also want to be capable of early pressure if required (such as vs Nasus or Yasuo).

Just make Transcendence come online at level 9 and give Absolute Focus 1 more AP early, up to 5 more late. Then, you wouldn't see Celerity quite so much except on junglers and supports. It is NOT OP and it's a rune that you really get used to too so it's very disruptive to change! It's just generally useful while the others are far too conditional. Of course the "generally useful" option becomes meta and outpeforms (outside of the niche scenarios). That's more or less normal and if it's too extreme, it's because the others are too delayed in their power. You've created a snowball meta where towers are paper vs Baron/Rift and even AP champions take them with ease. There is no "waiting for level 10" to have a useful rune or for Absolute Focus to be truly impactful.

zecastar3 votes

{quoted}

Ugh, Celerity is my favorite rune by far and the only reason it's taken so much is that the others are weak/situational. Level 10 especially for a JG takes ~15 minutes. Absolute Focus is really conditional and favors poke champions but poke champions are more vulnerable to ganks, more dependent on good positioning and value CDR highly, thus even those champions frequently favor the other runes above it. The exceptions are mostly when hitting break points for waveclear.

I really don't want Celerity ruined. It's by far my favorite rune in the tree and now you've already taken MS off Runic Echoes. It makes it even harder to be useful jungling. We can't even level 3 gank. It's like lanes are becoming hermetically sealed from JG interaction and we're reduced to PvE. I like planning out efficient pathing and good strategy but I also want to be capable of early pressure if required (such as vs Nasus or Yasuo).

Just make Transcendence come online at level 9 and give Absolute Focus 1 more AP early, up to 5 more late. Then, you wouldn't see Celerity quite so much except on junglers and supports. It is NOT OP and it's a rune that you really get used to too so it's very disruptive to change! It's just generally useful while the others are far too conditional. Of course the "generally useful" option becomes meta and outpeforms (outside of the niche scenarios). That's more or less normal and if it's too extreme, it's because the others are too delayed in their power. You've created a snowball meta where towers are paper vs Baron/Rift and even AP champions take them with ease. There is no "waiting for level 10" to have a useful rune or for Absolute Focus to be truly impactful.

Why does Transcendence have a level requirement instead of just making it 10 minutes or something? Level restrictions make it a lot worse on bot laners and junglers. Celerity is ready to go level 1.

Buttsubushi6 votes

Why not just 1% CDR per level till level 10? at least it isn't a dead rune for the first 15-18 mins

Impish Yordle7 votes

The rune system is looking fairly incoherent in terms of paths and what each one is supposed to accomplish at the moment. Sorcery, the path that is supposed to be about promoting spellcasts gets overloaded with movement speed and even its rune, Ultimate Hat that does exactly what is expected from the path gets removed on PBE to make way for... even more movement speed with the Nimbus Cloak rune. Shouldn't assassins be the ones primarily that go fast? Speaking of which their path, Domination, feels like a support path that happens to have assassin keystones. Why the hell are they placing wards and poros while reducing item cooldowns? And why was Ultimate Hat added to Domination? It even got nerfed through the hunter mechanic. Not to mention Manaflow Band was still getting used over it most of the time especially after mana changes. Inspiration (aside from some of its keystones) has some of the most boring runes despite being the path that is supposed to be the "whacky" and "playstyle-defining" one. Most of its runes are just "wait for a free item".

Also are there any plans for runes like Absolute Focus and Unflinching? Those are just 2 examples of runes that are a bit too situational and unreliable to the point where almost nobody makes use of them.

Perma CC7 votes

@Meddler Zyra Zyra

JUST want to put this out there one more time in case my post before wasn't seen. But THIS IS HOW MUCH I CARE about Zyra! I would reallly REAAAAAAAAAAALLLLY REALLLY like to see Zyra reverted to pre mid year mage update. I feel she was far more balanced then she currently is and much easier to tune. Before Zyra had less plants that were allowed to be more impactful and last longer because there were less of them to deal with for the enemy. Her old Q had further outward range allowing her to be safer in mid lane her being an extremely fragile champion she deserves to have that bit of outward range that she lost. Also the skill was a bit harder to land but also allowed her to manage her waves a bit better AND it allowed her to set her Seeds up in favorable positions without accidently spawning all her plants instantly when she uses her Q to farm or poke. Sometimes its not always favorable to pop all your plants. Regardless though, she had less plants which is a good thing but those plants were more impactful, their only issue at the time that most players had with them was their buggy targetting system. Really the mid year mage update didnt need to be this big for her, she just needed her plants targetting code to be fixed and maybe a bit more interesting passive. But the passive she was given was a huuge power budget waste on a passive that is RNG and has little thought or player imput in controlling. OLD zyra only needed a few changes to modernize her, not this huge kit change that she got and became very annoying to deal with when strong or really useless when weak. PLEASE RIOT give us old zyra back... id take OLD passive over the current any day of the weak as well as the old Q Deadly Bloom.

Zyra holds a VERY VERY SPECIAL place in my heart... ive loved this champion for many seasons... and it devastated me when you guys changed her. I STILL hold hope she will get reverted like the other mid year mage updates. AND IM LITERALLY BEGGING U GUYS AS A DEDICATED MEMBER... please. Id do anything to have her back... so that i can love this game again.

fabfan6 votes

Hi @Meddler, is it possible to got a small preview about fighter item changes ?

Cosnirak6 votes

I don't like these changes to solo carry potential at all. I'm not sure if I agree with the goal or not, but I definitely don't like the methods being used. Who gets a shutdown kill and who gets a tower kill is far more about random luck or which champion you're playing than a player's actual ability to carry. These changes feel lazy and uninspired with likely little to no positive impact at best.

For me personally the solo carry issue is being addressed completely backwards. You should be working on ensuring we are paired with teammates who have similar understandings of how to work as a team and a desire to do so. But that's a big, complicated issue involving far more than the live balance team, so we're back to shutdowns to the killer which even if it works decently well comes with costs and is obviously the far worse solution in the long term...

I feel that Celerity would be better as a flat ms increase that either goes up with level or with boot tier (I prefer boot tier). Balance it around giving as much ms as it currently does to typical slow champions. Not sure what to do with the AP/AD it gives but maybe just scrap that and add a tiny bit more ms on top of what I just said about the speed? Also as others have said, part of Celerity's issue is that the competition is a bit lacking.

Kha'Zix changes are very welcome but also very late. He's been a 5 alarm fire that has been treated like a smoke alarm with dead batteries. Taliyah changes are far later but also a lot more acceptable due to her level of impact on most players.

Water Stealer5 votes

possible suggestion for shurelia's: does a search of nearby allies and increases movement speed gained per ally affected. solo MS like 10%, team MS like 40%

shakedblu35 votes

What about Syndra? The buff to q passive helped, but she's still really weak. Is there any work planned for her?

Top Laner5 votes

I really enjoy the route you guys are going in regards to true damage on IE, but as a bruiser player, we itemize alot of health, even more so than tanks, and I feel that % hp true damage is a bit to relevant in the game right now. And I feel that the intention was to combat tanks, where it's a fair mechanic, but it ends up really hurting the Garens, Kleds, or any bruiser who builds alot of HP and little stats like Titanic, Sterraks. Any thoughts on this, it's extremely frusterating going against someone with % hp true damage as these champs due to lack of counterplay because they double dip since we also have only base resists.

Elegant Egoistic5 votes

Kaaarmaaa Karma Karma Karma Karma

NewKndredSkinPls4 votes

Are those Kindred changes that were talked about ever gonna happen?

greasy balls3 votes

Hi Meddler,

I think the changes planned for 8.11 are generally good, and fix a lot of the problems with crit ADCs. My question is, will ER-rush ADCs, namely Sivir , be getting compensation buffs? She already spikes later than other ADCs, and with the changes planned she'll be stuck on <50% crit chance until 3 items, at which point other ADCs will have 100% crit chance. Which seems like too much of a nerf considering she isn't as problematic as the others at the moment. Thoughts?

Khristophoros3 votes

Celerity is not "drowning out" other choices. The other choices are just terrible.

Why would you ever use Absolute Focus? It's unreliable.

Transcendence is ok, and has some uses, but it's a late game rune. Generally we take early game runes unless you completely gut them like you did with Scorch.

If you want people to pick the other two runes make them reliable and useful throughout the whole game like Celerity is. And how about making them more interesting than stats?

HighIqLowLife2 votes

Guys consider lowering the CD on supports items if you want to change the meta

RiotMeddler14 votes

What's the problem you're trying to solve with that change? Agree it would change the meta, but that alone's not inherently positive (removing all AP items would change the meta too for example, but not in a way that made for a better game).

Axerito12 votes

The problem with supports right now is that they became active item holders more than champion on their own. Supports are now defined by items they can use rather than their personal kits. Shifting some power from items to support champion's abilities would be a great change in my opinion.

Partholonian5 votes

But lowering the CD of the items would increase their power.

Anyway, I don't think this is really true of Thresh TahmKench Bard Braum Rakan , to name a few. Supports have kit abilities that definitely do matter.

Speeedy1 votes

@meddler why do you always end your post with that ziggs picture? hes not even your most played champion in the last 2 seasons

Ugly Alien4 votes

{quoted}

@meddler why do you always end your post with that ziggs picture? hes not even your most played champion in the last 2 seasons

So it's confirmed the father abandoned his son =(

Fun fact: Ziggs is the least banned champion out of 140 champions. He is sitting last at 140 (source op.gg). He is banned 0.03% of the time. Basically no one cares nor scared about Ziggs cause he has no real 1 v 1 threat. Players know they can bully Ziggs.

atomicwit4 votes

[{quoted}](name=Ugly Alien,realm=NA,application-id=A7LBtoKc,discussion-id=B3kWBlWr,comment-id=001f0000,timestamp=2018-05-11T20:49:01.677+0000)

So it's confirmed the father abandoned his son =(

Fun fact: Ziggs is the least banned champion out of 140 champions. He is sitting last at 140 (source op.gg). He is banned 0.03% of the time. Basically no one cares nor scared about Ziggs cause he has no real 1 v 1 threat. Players know they can bully Ziggs.

Ziggs is still trash. Sub 2.5% pick rate and barely a 50% winrate. Even Lux is better now and she has 2x the pick rate as well as more utility. He needs better scaling on W in exchange for less turret damage from passive. I mean, who even cares about turret damage now? Regular APs slice through turrets too. I don't even need to buy Lich Bane anymore! Turrets are nothing but a free gold sink.

I'd much rather have W scale another 25% AP in damage so I can all-in effectively. Or maybe 5% more AP on Q (but that's probably more annoying to face than W since it's so spammable). Idk, but his late game should be a lot better considering he can't solo-carry and one-shot like a Fizz can or even a Xerath can. The Liandry's change really sucked for him as a poke champion. He's also really vulnerable. His damage isn't even bad at all if he can hit consistently but that's not realistic. Maybe I'm just bad with his W as an escape but I get killed so much that even if I have the damage to carry, I can't do it.

CIY Shifu1 votes

Give Champions like WuKong MonkeyKing , an identity, the champion pool overall should be bigger.

Support Position4 votes

champ pool needs to be smaller. Are you shitting me?

The balance team can't balance anything as it is.

More from Dev Corner

More by Meddler