Prandine, you still don't get it.

Keldjur·8/13/2018, 9:47:58 AM·2 votes·1,683 views
Riot-Tantram lying, why?

My thread got locked down and Pradine wrote a msg and it looke like this: It's clear at this point that this thread is going nowhere. Since the OP is unwilling to listen to opposing views without resorting to the Moving the Goalposts fallacy (and because nothing more can be said that hasn't already been stated here) this thread is now locked.

Feel free to contact us at the Moderation Discord or at Discuss the Boards for any questions, comments or concerns about this. Thank you and have a good day.

P.S. Here are some descriptions about the Moving the Goalposts fallacy: Moving the goalposts is an informal fallacy in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded. That is, after an attempt has been made to score a goal, the goalposts are moved to exclude the attempt. The problem with changing the rules of the game is that the meaning of the result is changed, too.

Moving the Goalposts (also known as: gravity game, raising the bar, argument by demanding impossible perfection [form of])

Description: Demanding from an opponent that he or she address more and more points after the initial counter-argument has been satisfied refusing to concede or accept the opponent’s argument.

Prandine Im sad to inform you that you did miss the entire point of the thread, this becuase you have not read or understood the comments and points I made in this thread.

The point of the thread is that People in here, people who work with and at riot assumes a lot and they are often wrong. Like you when you locked down my thread due to your own missunderstanding. I believe I stated ~20 times that it's important to listen to one another and its also important to allow others to explain themselves. You have to allow yourself to listen and get things explained. Just like me, and every other rioter you are not perfect, you make misstakes, just like me and everyone else. This is why it is very important that when you are unsure you ask. You dont judge, you dont take actions before you know for certain what's going on.... This is not what happen.

I have also previously explained and showed all of you how I was banned from these forums due to a missunderstanding where I was trying to end a loss-spree by asking others on how to end it, you decided and interpeted this as me braging about how much Im loosing and that I was encouraging others to lose games as well <-- This is what happen cuase I talked to you about it, you never unbanned me and never apologized for your assumptions that turned out to be bad, really bad.

https://s26.postimg.cc/3s56ad1dl/zenmonk3.png https://s26.postimg.cc/9hleuo7jr/zenmonk4.png

Also I was gold 4 at that time (you can look it up) and in fact got up to gold 3. Just like this thread is about you assuming the worst, that's what happen here. Your co-worker assumed the worst about me and in fact did call me a liar... no sorry... That I could not be trusted because I had not been "telling the truth" about my rank and what I experienced.

So while you believe I can't be trusted I have bout 50 cases where you have been lying to or about me <-- With evidence. You have yet to prove that I have lied to you once. <-- Feel free to prove it.

I was also banned in game for a week I believe. What had happen? I called someones idéa of running in to people 1v5 and dying "moronic". What happen? Your system locked on to me, someone reported me and when I go and ask you what had happen you claim I had called people morons... NO RIOT AND NO PRADINE Im not calling anyone a moron, Im calling a play/idea moronic. <-- And if we are no longer allowed to say that a play or idea is bad... then wtf riot? Then it becomes a game where the the team with the highest average age wins most of the time (I made a thread explaining this previously)

What you wrote was in fact wrong: " Since the OP is unwilling to listen to opposing views without resorting to the Moving the Goalposts fallacy " This is not what happen at all. If the thread is still visable for others anyone can go in there and see that this is not the case. Look at the comments in there and please tell me 1 opposing view, you won't find a single one and that is the point I was trying to make. I believe 2 people understood the thread and commented on it. It was not problem for them to engage in a discussion but it was ruined by a lot of off-topic comments that I requested be removed from my thread... but once again you did not listen/honor this request.

I have not at all moved the goalpost and for you to interpet and translate my actions in to this "moving goalposts" you are in fact supporting the points I made in my previous thread, that you assume, all of you assumes and you assume the worst in others. This is why you must allow others to explain themselves, not everyone is evil and not everyone you punish did something wrong. If in fact you were to ask me I could have explained what was going on. You chose you assume the worst and lock the thread... So why could you not have contacted me and we could have talked about it rather then you assuming the worst,locking my thread and then giving me this msg that I believe doesnt help me at all... well it does cause it proves my point that you are not really listening/understanding what people are trying to tell you.

"Demanding from an opponent that he or she address more and more points after the initial counter-argument has been satisfied refusing to concede or accept the opponent’s argument." <- This also never happen. I ask of you to give exampels where you think this happen... Cause as I prevously stated noone is perfect and I can be wrong to, I now allow you to explain to me where this happen in my previous thread.

"P.S. Here are some descriptions about the Moving the Goalposts fallacy: Moving the goalposts is an informal fallacy in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded." <-- This is kinda surreal to be honest... cause if anything others were moving goalposts against me if you are to define it like this. Tantram said X . I claim that tantram is wrong and he should prove/show that X is correct... In my previous thread people now comes up to me demanding that I prove that Tantram's X isnt true... you get this I hope? Lets say you claim I stolen your appels. I say Ehh, No I didnt and you have no evidence for that "You liar!" ... Now comes along your friends and family and starts harassing me about calling you a liar... but I was not the one who made the claim in the first place. If anything this is moving goalposts or "...is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded."

The titel of the thread was "Riot-Tantram lying, why?" The thread ends with: This thread is about Riot-Tantram and why he did lie.

Yet I find comments about my mental health, I find pictures and emotes(?) that has nothing to do with the thread. I find lies and strange remarks and people who claim really strange interpetation of the rules. And I dont find a single moderator doing anything about any of this, even after reporting a comment like 10 times.

What I dont find is a single open question <-- And that is what this thread is about.

"Feel free to contact us at the Moderation Discord or at Discuss the Boards for any questions, comments or concerns about this. Thank you and have a good day." Im sad to inform you that Im banned from your discord as well... what happen you didn't ask: A moderator demanded things of me... ohh sorry, expected things out of me like respect... and when I requested the same standards as the moderator, I was banned. I was to treat you with respect but not the other way around. <-- Pull up the log and read it yourself. So if you want to talk on discord Im here but Im still banned from your discord. Im more then willing to talk and explain myself and answer questions, so there has never been a reason to translate, intepret or assume things about me.

Once again, this thread is about you(not you personally, but everyone related to riot) assumes the worst in others. You interpet and translate their action and words with limtied context and without talking to others... This causes a lot of problems, problems that I have shown you happen to me. Real problems where you assumed the worst and did punish me for no valid reason. Like when I have a legit 10-game loss streak and is asking for help, you decides to punish me in the ticket support and in the forums. Or the game where I said "moronic" and you translate this in to "Moron" <-- This happen cause I did talk to you about it on twitter. I had to sit there explaining how someone who is acting moronic isn't a moron to deft ears.

you locked down my thread without talking to me and without understanding the situation. You allowed "trolls" or as I call them "Forum rats" (I have also given my definition for this so there is no need to assume Im calling them something of low value or anything bad at all. It has nothing to do with value only with positioning) to destroy the thread I have by not removing their comments that are either offtopic, personal attacks or just trying to provoke a reaction.

SO my only question to you (Prandine) is: Can we stop assuming the worst about each other and can we allow each other to explain themselves rather then having the other part assume the worst and then punish the other part for that missunderstandign and wrongful assumption? <-- This would remove a lot of toxicity and missunderstandings from this community.

Thank you for your time This thread is about: People related to riot assuming the worst in summoners and not allowing them to explain themselves.

I end with words from legend Riot-Lyte: "I was talking to this one kid who had been punished a lot and finally we reached out to him and asked why he acted the way he did. During the talk we came to the understanding that noone had told him(explained) that he could not do what he did and that is why he got punished... After this riot lyte made the reform cards that did lower toxicity and also traffic in to your support as not as many came to you asking why they were banned... they had a reform card that told them this.

An explanation goes a long way in the quest to understand.

4 Comments

ModThe Djinn8/13/2018, 12:49:42 PM5 votes

Also, you are very much offtopic and wrong about everything.

This is a direct quote from your thread in response to a rather well-written response that addressed much of the behavior shown in your thread. This is the sort of response that makes it fairly clear to moderation that you are not actually interested in seeing any opposing view, and that the discussion is definitely shifting. You may not have agreed with that individual's perspective, but everything in his response was indeed very much relevant to the topic and the discussion at hand, and casually dismissing it as you did is indicative of an unwillingness to actually have a discussion.

While it's possible that is not your intent, moderation is not based on your intent alone, but also how your behavior appears to others on the board. The thread lock was fully appropriate, as this sort of behavior showed up in numerous instances in that thread.

Paíntchip8/13/2018, 1:01:22 PM1 votes

Dude. Too mich words this late in morning, but what I did get through is just a description of everyone on these boards especially the moderators. This also includes rioters, ever try sending a ticket?