Skip to content

weakness or perversion?

G0dEmperorTrump··2 votes·2,323 views

When I saw this had been labelled "offensive" by a mod, I thought it was a joke. But no, clearly, he judged this would hurt someone so bad he needed to remove it, so nobody can see this TERRIBLY OFFENSIVE comment and immediately jump out of a window because they can't outlive the shame. All the while being completely unfased by people calling humans "toxic" lol. Sooo at first I thought the guy was just a perv, trying to feel important because he's a loser or smth. But I guess he must have directions and be monitored, so he can't afford to censor anything he wants. So, maybe, that's not his judgement, but what riot considers "offensive". If that's the case, there are only 3 possibilities : 1)Those who set the rules at Riot are pathologically weak-minded, they cannot even afford to have human interaction because any external judgement would destroy their fragile egos. 2)They set those rules based on the feedback of their player base, which means the majority of lol players have psyhological problems of a clinical degree. 3)Riot has a wicked agenda

https://i.ibb.co/JdthWVT/perv.jpg

8 Comments

DuskDaUmbreon11 votes

They're banning it because "SJW" is only ever used to shut down discussion and insult others.

That, and because nobody wants to deal with political shitflinging, which is all that the phrase "sjw" is.

Myrmiron3 votes

{quoted}

They're banning it because "SJW" is only ever used to shut down discussion and insult others.

That, and because nobody wants to deal with political shitflinging, which is all that the phrase "sjw" is.

I mean, there's a lot of words like that that don't get removed. Idk, I have to say I don't agree with the removal and I especially don't agree with the reasoning. However this thread is kinda dumb, especially the title.

G0dEmperorTrump1 votes

So what about branding people "toxic" like a virus that needs to be exterminated?

ModThe Djinn5 votes

I'm not sure why you're shocked here. When you're calling a portion of the community "weak social justice warriors," you are insulting them and, therefore, being offensive to other players. The rules are very clear:

Do not post content intended to insult, belittle, disrespect, or intentionally offend other community members as individuals or as groups. Criticism is an important and useful method of feedback, but must be respectful and constructive in nature. Non-constructive forms of criticism (such as questioning another poster's intelligence or requesting the firing or removal of an individual) are violations of this rule.

If you feel the need to provide criticism in this belittling manner, find another venue for it.

G0dEmperorTrump2 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=ElMjWeX2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-04-29T12:34:04.208+0000)

I'm not sure why you're shocked here. When you're calling a portion of the community "weak social justice warriors," you are insulting them and, therefore, being offensive to other players. The rules are very clear:

"Social justice" or regression, is a manifestation of weakness. I'm merely observing facts. Isn't it their own claim? "we need protection from riot because your words hurt us". Being weak is the premise of their own argument. They make their weakness public. Therefore they're the ones insulting themselves, I'm only aknowledging the fact xD and the rules are null and void since they call people "toxic". Only a virus is toxic and needs eradication. You can hardly find more hateful speech. Weakness is a natural tendency, its existence allows us to rise and show virtue. Calling out weakness is a great service done to the community. Only a wicked, a nihilist, would want to outlaw the criticism of weakness.

ModThe Djinn3 votes

{quoted}...and the rules are null and void since they call people "toxic".

As the one who is charged with enforcing the rules and has the authority to do so, I promise you that, no matter how "null and void" you consider them, failure to follow them will lead to a loss of posting privileges. You don't have to agree with the rules, but you do need to follow them or face the consequences.

rujitra3 votes

So your response to having a comment removed for being polarized and insulting is to make a polarizing and insulting post complaining?

G0dEmperorTrump2 votes

it's almost as if PC policies were antagonizing

More from Discuss the Boards

More by G0dEmperorTrump